首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
"Until recently, I thought that there would never again be an opportunity to be involved with an industry as socially destructiv
"Until recently, I thought that there would never again be an opportunity to be involved with an industry as socially destructiv
admin
2017-01-15
60
问题
"Until recently, I thought that there would never again be an opportunity to be involved with an industry as socially destructive as the subprime mortgage industry, " said Steve Eisman, a hedge-fund manager who made a lot of money during the financial crisis by shorting bank shares, to Congress in June. "I was wrong. The for-profit education industry has proven equal to the task. " America’s for-profit colleges are under fire, and the Obama administration is preparing tough new regulations for them. Although recent scandals suggest higher education needs to be better regulated, discriminating against the for-profit sector could do wider damage.
The notion that profit is too dirty a motive to be allowed in a business as fine as education is pervasive. Even Britain’s Conservatives, determined though they are to introduce radical educational reforms, have drawn the line at allowing for-profit schools to get state funding.
America has generally been more liberal; and, with the state and non-profit colleges cutting back, the for-profit sector has been doing startlingly well. In 2008—2009, some 3, 000 for-profit colleges educated 3. 2m students—59% more than three years earlier, and 11.7% of all students.
Yet recent government reports suggest that some of these colleges have a troublingly familiar business model: selling a low-grade product to people who are paying with subsidized government loans. The Department of Education reported that most students at many of these universities were defaulting on their loans. Similarly, an investigation by the Government Accountability Office found that even leading for-profit colleges such as Kaplan and the University of Phoenix had engaged in cunning practices to recruit students and encourage them to borrow large sums to pay for their courses.
Among the most controversial of the new rules due to be introduced on November 1st is a "gainful employment" requirement that would make a course eligible(合格的)for government loans only if enough current or past students are repaying their loans. The for-profit colleges maintain that they have high drop-out rates because their students are poorer than those in the state and nonprofit sector, and that the gainful-employment rule will simply reduce access to higher education for poorer people. Don Graham, boss of the Washington Post Company, which owns Kaplan, has suggested that private colleges should be required to refund all fees if a student decides to drop out during his first term in order to "drive out all the bad actors" from the industry.
Constructive suggestions are rare in a debate that has mixed a lot of rhetorical cant with a big principle. The cant is more obvious. The American right cites Barack Obama’s proposals as another sign that he hates capitalism. Yet not only abuses plainly occurred but for-profit colleges are hardly poster children for free enterprise: they are already heavily regulated, not least because most of the loans to students are provided by the government. The left, from its non-profit redoubts, claims that these are big businesses exploiting the little guy.
The principle? Concentrate on the quality of the education, not the ownership. All sorts of colleges seem to have been guilty of shabby marketing. They should be treated the same. Good rules—such as Mr. Graham’s one—should apply to non-profit and for-profit colleges alike. Singling out for-profits for special attention risks depriving students, and America at large, of the full benefits in innovation and cost-effectiveness that the profit motive has generally brought to higher education. That really would be "socially destructive".
According to the for-profit colleges, which of the following is CORRECT about the gainful-employment rule?
选项
A、More poorer people can’t get the opportunity of higher education.
B、More poorer students will get government loans easily.
C、The rule will make any course eligible for government loans.
D、The rule will reduce the high drop-out rates.
答案
A
解析
第四段第二句提到,赢利性院校坚称他们的高退学率是因为他们的学生比州立院校和非赢利性院校的学生更加贫穷,而“有偿使用”的条例会减少贫穷学生获得高等教育的机会。因此[A]“更多贫穷的人无法获得高等教育的机会”为正确答案。[B]“更多贫穷的学生能更容易地获得政府的贷款”、[C]“该条例使各门课程都有资格获得政府贷款”和[D]“该条例减少退学率”均为错误的表述,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/W8JK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Itisimperativethatthegovernment______moreinvestmentintotheshipbuildingindustry.
Duringthereadinglesson,theteacheraskedstudentstoreadafew______fromthenovel.
Warning:Holdingacellphoneagainstyourearorstoringitinyourpocketmaybehazardoustoyourhealth.Thisparaphrase
Thanksinparttotechnologyanditsconstantsoundingandringing,roughly41millionpeopleintheUnitedStates—nearlyathir
Hardshipdidnotendwithfreedom.Therewere【C1】______regionalvariationinboththestatusand【C2】______offreeblacksduring
Hardshipdidnotendwithfreedom.Therewere【C1】______regionalvariationinboththestatusand【C2】______offreeblacksduring
Somescholarshavecommentedonthe"devastating"effectsthattheemphasisonEnglishlearninghashadontheChineseeducation
Ontheroadmotoristsshouldbeawareofcyclistsandbe______towardsthem.
[A]balanced[I]analyzes[B]moderately[J]fast[C]propels[K]expand[D]multitude[L]persecute[E]achievement[M]visual
Ablindbabyisdoublyhandicapped.Notonlyisitunabletosee,butbecauseitcannotreceivethevisualstimulusfromitsenv
随机试题
若彩色摄影的画面背景带有浅绿色,应使用何种滤色镜校正
内分泌腺的结构特点之一是没有
第二类精神药品管理措施包括()。
1902年于海牙订立的《离婚及分居法律冲突与管辖权冲突规范》第2条第1款规定:“离婚的请求非依夫妻的本国法和法院地法均有离婚理由的,不得提出。”该条规范属于国际私法冲突规范的哪种类型?()
某业主投资一建设工程项目,通过招标选择了一家施工单位,并与之签订了合同。合同约定,在施工过程中,若由于业主原因造成窝工,则机械的停工费用和人工窝工费按台班费和工日费的40%结算支付。该工程按如下计划进行:在计划执行过程中,出现了如下事件:
建设工程设计合同区别于建设工程勘察合同的主要权利义务,更加强调的当事人权利义务包括()。
预期理论暗含的假定是()。
北方公司为从事房地产开发业务的上市公司,2008年1月1日,外购位于甲地块上的一栋写字楼,作为自用办公楼,甲地块的土地使用权能够单独计量;2008年3月1日,购入乙地块和丙地块,分别用于开发对外出售的住宅楼和写字楼,至2009年12月31日,该住宅楼和写字
()提出了“儿童中心主义”的思想。
监护人有权处理被监护人财产的法定情形是()。(2012一专一23)
最新回复
(
0
)