首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
admin
2012-04-23
52
问题
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even create the next Google. Better yet, this plan won’t cost the government a dime. In fact, it will save a lot of money. But few politicians are going to want to touch it. Here’s the plan: More immigration. A pathway to legal status for undocumented immigrants. And a recognition that immigration policy is economic policy, and needs to be thought of as such.
See what I meant about politicians not liking it?
Economists will tell you that immigrants raise wages for the average native-born worker. They’ll tell you that they make things cheaper for us to buy here, and that if we didn’t have immigrants for some of these jobs, the jobs would move to other countries. They’ll tell you that we should allow for much more highly skilled immigration, because that’s about as close to a free lunch as you’re likely to find. They’ll tell you that the people who should most want a path to legal status for undocumented immigrants are the low-income workers who are most opposed to such plans. And about all this, the economists are right.
There are also noneconomic considerations, of course. Integrating cultures and nationalities is difficult. Undocumented immigrants raise issues of law and fairness. Border security is important. Those questions are important. They’re just not the subject of this column.
The mistake we make when thinking about the effect immigrants have on our wages, says Giovanni Peri, an economist at the University of California at Davis who has studied the issue extensively, is we imagine an economy where the number of jobs is fixed. Then, if one immigrant comes in, he takes one of those jobs or forces a worker to accept a lower wage. But that’s not how our economy works. With more labor—particularly more labor of different kinds—the economy grows larger. It produces more stuff. There are more workers buying things and that increases the total number of jobs. We understand perfectly well that Europe is in trouble because its low birth rates mean fewer workers and that means less economic growth. We ourselves worry that we’re not graduating enough scientists and engineers. But the economy doesn’t care if it gets workers through birth rates or green cards.
In fact, there’s a sense in which green cards are superior. Economists separate new workers into two categories: Those who "substitute" for existing labor—we’re both construction workers, and the boss can easily swap you out for me; and those who "complement" existing labor—you’re a construction engineer and I’m a construction worker. Immigrants, more so than U.S.-born workers, tend to be in the second category, as the jobs you want to give to someone who doesn’t speak English very well and doesn’t have many skills are different from the jobs you give to people who are fluent and have more skills.
But that’s only half of their benefit. "Living standards are a function of two things," says Michael Greenstone, director of the Hamilton Project, which is hosting a Washington conference on the economics of immigration next week. "They’re a function of our wages and the prices of the goods we purchase. " And immigrants reduce the prices of those goods. Patricia Cortes, an economist at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, found that immigrants lowered the prices in "immigrant-intensive industries" like housekeeping and gardening by about 10 percent. So our wages go up and the prices of the things we want to buy go down.
We should remember, though, that the average worker isn’t every worker. A study by Harvard economists George Borjas and Lawrence Katz found that although immigrants raised native wages overall, they slightly hurt the 8 percent of workers without a high-school education and those with a college education. A subsequent study by Peri looked harder at the ways immigrant labor differed from native labor and found that all groups of workers saw a benefit from immigrants—though unskilled workers saw less of a benefit than highly skilled workers.
And unskilled workers face even tougher competition from undocumented immigrants who, because their status is so tenuous, will accept pay beneath the minimum wage. And they are unlikely to complain about safety regulations or work conditions. That takes unskilled immigrants from being a bit cheaper than unskilled natives and makes them a lot cheaper—which makes employers likelier to hire them for jobs that native workers could do better.
This suggests, first, that American workers would be better off if we figured out a way to take the 12 million undocumented immigrants and give them legal status, and second, that we might want to give them more direct help if we’re going to increase immigration. Both are possible—just politically difficult.
Our immigration policy should be primarily oriented around our national goals. And one goal is to have the world’s most innovative and dynamic economy. It’s never going to be the case that each and every one of the planet’s most talented individuals is born on American soil. But those born elsewhere could be lured here. People like living here. We should be leveraging that advantage, mercilessly roaming the globe, finding the most talented people and attracting them to our country. When we have the best talent, we have the best innovations. That’s how we landed Google, Intel, and the atomic bomb. Immigrants are about twice as likely as native-born Americans to start a small business, and they’re 30 percent more likely to apply for a patent.
We can learn from the fourth paragraph that______.
选项
A、immigration will bring about noneconomic benefits
B、immigration will bring about some social problems
C、immigration will raise issues of law and fairness
D、immigration should be considered carefully
答案
B
解析
文章第四段主要探讨移民可能带来的社会问题,如文化融合、边境安全和社会公平等问题。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/WGiO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Languageissaidtobearbitrarybecausethereisnologicalconnectionbetweenmeaningsand______.
JonasFrisenhadhiseurekamomentin1997.Backthen,scientistssuspectedthattherewasaspecialtypeofcellinthebraint
Canada’sEducationSystemTheCanadiangovernmentprovides【1】publiceducationforallstudentsfromKindergartentoGrade12.
LanguageFamiliesAllofthelanguageswithinalanguagefamilyare【1】andallofthemhaveasimilarhistory.Let’stakeabr
LanguageFamiliesAllofthelanguageswithinalanguagefamilyare【1】andallofthemhaveasimilarhistory.Let’stakeabr
Theworldisgoingthroughthebiggestwaveofmergersandacquisitionseverwitnessed.TheprocesssweepsfromhyperactiveAmer
A、BecauseheescapedwithoutinjuryfromthesecondtoweroftheWorldTradeCenter.B、Becausehewasseriouslyinjuredduringt
ThescientificnameistheHoloceneAge,butclimatologistsliketocallourcurrentclimaticphasetheLongSummer.Thehistory
What’shappening?
随机试题
背景材料(大意): 受特殊计划生育政策、快速城市化和工业化进程中生育意愿迅速变化等多方面因素影响,我国正在进入快速的老龄化过程。截至2013年底,我国60周岁及以上人口20243万,占总人口的14.9%,65周岁及以上人口13161万,占总人口的9.7%
患者男性,40岁,周期性发热伴全身乏力半年余,否认结核病史。查体:消瘦,双侧颈部锁骨上及双侧腹股沟区触及多发肿大淋巴结,无压痛,心肺检查(一),B超示腹膜后多发肿大淋巴结,TB-Ab(一)。临床拟行67Ga显像,下述67Ga显像方法不正确的是
A.鼠疫和霍乱B.流行性感冒C.艾滋病D.肺炎E.肝癌《中华人民共和国传染病防治法》规定的乙类传染病有
卫生行政部门收到医学会的医疗事故技术鉴定书后,应当对()进行审核。
吕某,女,45岁。因反复“吐血”3天,加重2小时送入急诊。王医生接诊患者后,急查血常规正常,诊断为“上消化道出血”,给予抑酸、保护胃黏膜治疗后留观。留观6小时后患者突然出现咯血,量约300ml,鲜红色,并伴有心慌、胸闷、气喘。刘医生查看患者,查体:T38℃
甲公司为增值税一般纳税人,适用的增值税税率为17%,2015年12月发生如下经济事项:(1)为宣传新产品发生广告费15万元,为拓展产品销售市场发生的业务招待费8万元,均用银行存款支付。(2)确认销售部门12月份发生的职工薪酬10万元,销售部门专
根据税收征管法律制度的规定,下列各项中,不属于税务担保范围的是()。
本题涉及关税、消费税、增值税、城建税、教育费附加。某市大型商贸公司为增值税一般纳税人,兼营商品加工、批发、零售和进出口业务,2020年10月相关经营业务如下:(1)进口高档化妆品一批,支付国外的买价220万元、购货佣金6万元、国外的经纪费4万元;支付运
广西壮族自治区()花山岩画景观已被列为世界遗产名录。
(12)用于把摄影作品、绘画作品输入到计算机中,进而对这些图像信息进行加工处理、管理、使用、存储和输出。
最新回复
(
0
)