首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
admin
2012-04-23
48
问题
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even create the next Google. Better yet, this plan won’t cost the government a dime. In fact, it will save a lot of money. But few politicians are going to want to touch it. Here’s the plan: More immigration. A pathway to legal status for undocumented immigrants. And a recognition that immigration policy is economic policy, and needs to be thought of as such.
See what I meant about politicians not liking it?
Economists will tell you that immigrants raise wages for the average native-born worker. They’ll tell you that they make things cheaper for us to buy here, and that if we didn’t have immigrants for some of these jobs, the jobs would move to other countries. They’ll tell you that we should allow for much more highly skilled immigration, because that’s about as close to a free lunch as you’re likely to find. They’ll tell you that the people who should most want a path to legal status for undocumented immigrants are the low-income workers who are most opposed to such plans. And about all this, the economists are right.
There are also noneconomic considerations, of course. Integrating cultures and nationalities is difficult. Undocumented immigrants raise issues of law and fairness. Border security is important. Those questions are important. They’re just not the subject of this column.
The mistake we make when thinking about the effect immigrants have on our wages, says Giovanni Peri, an economist at the University of California at Davis who has studied the issue extensively, is we imagine an economy where the number of jobs is fixed. Then, if one immigrant comes in, he takes one of those jobs or forces a worker to accept a lower wage. But that’s not how our economy works. With more labor—particularly more labor of different kinds—the economy grows larger. It produces more stuff. There are more workers buying things and that increases the total number of jobs. We understand perfectly well that Europe is in trouble because its low birth rates mean fewer workers and that means less economic growth. We ourselves worry that we’re not graduating enough scientists and engineers. But the economy doesn’t care if it gets workers through birth rates or green cards.
In fact, there’s a sense in which green cards are superior. Economists separate new workers into two categories: Those who "substitute" for existing labor—we’re both construction workers, and the boss can easily swap you out for me; and those who "complement" existing labor—you’re a construction engineer and I’m a construction worker. Immigrants, more so than U.S.-born workers, tend to be in the second category, as the jobs you want to give to someone who doesn’t speak English very well and doesn’t have many skills are different from the jobs you give to people who are fluent and have more skills.
But that’s only half of their benefit. "Living standards are a function of two things," says Michael Greenstone, director of the Hamilton Project, which is hosting a Washington conference on the economics of immigration next week. "They’re a function of our wages and the prices of the goods we purchase. " And immigrants reduce the prices of those goods. Patricia Cortes, an economist at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, found that immigrants lowered the prices in "immigrant-intensive industries" like housekeeping and gardening by about 10 percent. So our wages go up and the prices of the things we want to buy go down.
We should remember, though, that the average worker isn’t every worker. A study by Harvard economists George Borjas and Lawrence Katz found that although immigrants raised native wages overall, they slightly hurt the 8 percent of workers without a high-school education and those with a college education. A subsequent study by Peri looked harder at the ways immigrant labor differed from native labor and found that all groups of workers saw a benefit from immigrants—though unskilled workers saw less of a benefit than highly skilled workers.
And unskilled workers face even tougher competition from undocumented immigrants who, because their status is so tenuous, will accept pay beneath the minimum wage. And they are unlikely to complain about safety regulations or work conditions. That takes unskilled immigrants from being a bit cheaper than unskilled natives and makes them a lot cheaper—which makes employers likelier to hire them for jobs that native workers could do better.
This suggests, first, that American workers would be better off if we figured out a way to take the 12 million undocumented immigrants and give them legal status, and second, that we might want to give them more direct help if we’re going to increase immigration. Both are possible—just politically difficult.
Our immigration policy should be primarily oriented around our national goals. And one goal is to have the world’s most innovative and dynamic economy. It’s never going to be the case that each and every one of the planet’s most talented individuals is born on American soil. But those born elsewhere could be lured here. People like living here. We should be leveraging that advantage, mercilessly roaming the globe, finding the most talented people and attracting them to our country. When we have the best talent, we have the best innovations. That’s how we landed Google, Intel, and the atomic bomb. Immigrants are about twice as likely as native-born Americans to start a small business, and they’re 30 percent more likely to apply for a patent.
We can learn from the fourth paragraph that______.
选项
A、immigration will bring about noneconomic benefits
B、immigration will bring about some social problems
C、immigration will raise issues of law and fairness
D、immigration should be considered carefully
答案
B
解析
文章第四段主要探讨移民可能带来的社会问题,如文化融合、边境安全和社会公平等问题。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/WGiO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Meteorologistsroutinelytelluswhatnextweek’sweatherislikelytobe,andclimatescientistsdiscusswhatmighthappenin1
Ascollegeseniorshurtleintothejobhunt,littlefibsontheresume--forexample,claimingsdegreewhenthey’rethreecredit
LanguageFamiliesAllofthelanguageswithinalanguagefamilyare【1】andallofthemhaveasimilarhistory.Let’stakeabr
Theworldisgoingthroughthebiggestwaveofmergersandacquisitionseverwitnessed.TheprocesssweepsfromhyperactiveAmer
TheshortstoryTheMurderintheRueMorguewaswrittenby______.
Universitiesarenolongerrelativelyemptyinsummer.Asthestudentsmoveout,holiday-makersmove,eventothemostunl
Universitiesarenolongerrelativelyemptyinsummer.Asthestudentsmoveout,holiday-makersmove,eventothemostunl
WhichofthefollowingsportswasNOTinventedinBritain?
Backin2000,inspiredbyadesiretohelpthoseinneed,MeganandDennisDoyleofMinneapolisdecidedtheywantedtodomoret
随机试题
在“Acc2.mdb”数据库中有“部门”、“基本情况”和“职位”3张表。(1)以“基本情况”表为数据源,创建“经理信息”查询,查询各部门经理的信息。结果显示“姓名”、“职务”和“电话”字段。(2)用SQL语句修改“经理信息”查询,使查询结果显示2000
企业物力资源战略
有关头颅正位摄影的叙述,错误的是
X线透过被照体时,由于被照体对X线的吸收、散射而减弱,含有人体密度信息的透过射线作用于屏一片系统,经过加工处理形成密度不等的X线照片;X线照片影像的5大要素:密度、对比度、锐利度、颗粒度及失真度,前四项为构成照片影像的物理因素,后者为构成照片影像的几何因素
下列何药主散头面风热之邪,善治头痛不已
有关牙本质粘结剂的描述,不正确的是
男性,50岁。反复咳嗽、咳痰4年,近半年来发作时常伴呼吸困难。体检:双肺散在哮鸣音,肺底部有湿啰哕音。肺功能测定:一秒钟用力呼气容用力肺活量为55%.,残气容积/肺总量为35%.。诊断应考虑为
甲一日下班回家,发现家中电器悉数烧坏,经查证发现,是因为供电部门工作失误,将工业用电输人民用线路,致使电压过高,电器烧毁。另经查实甲因长期拖欠电费已被供电部门中止供电,甲现在是私自接搭线路,下列陈述正确的是:
微博在中国的惊人繁荣让很多人似乎感到了某种互联网民主而充满乐观,但就好像一片水域蓝藻特别繁盛,并不是这里水质_______的表示,微博的商业成功,也应该引起我们对中国社会结构的_______和对当下舆论环境的_______。填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是(
《放下三棒鼓,扛起红缨枪》是《刘胡兰》的选曲。()
最新回复
(
0
)