首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
【F1】Sending your child to piano or violin lessons in a bid to boost their academic achievement is a waste of money, according to
【F1】Sending your child to piano or violin lessons in a bid to boost their academic achievement is a waste of money, according to
admin
2017-06-25
20
问题
【F1】
Sending your child to piano or violin lessons in a bid to boost their academic achievement is a waste of money, according to scientists.
Although research has shown that youngsters who take music lessons are more likely to be top of their class, Professor Schellenberg claims this link is misleading.【F2】
Instead, improved academic performance may be because brighter children from privileged backgrounds are more likely to learn an instrument, rather than music classes helping to boost their intelligence.
"Music may change you a bit, but it’s also the case that different children take music lessons." said Professor Schellenberg, who added that parents’ education was the most influential factor on musicality.【F3】
Children who take music lessons come from families with higher incomes, they come from families with more educated parents, they also do more extracurricular activities, they have higher IQs, and they do better at school.
【F4】
In tests on 167 children who played piano or other instruments, they found their answer to personality tests could predict how likely it was for them to continue their music lessons.
Those who were more outgoing and conscientious were more likely to continue to play. "We were motivated by the fact that kids who take music lessons are particularly good students, in school they actually do better than you would predict from their IQ, so obviously something else is going on." Professor Schellenberg told the American Association for the Advancement of Science(A A AS)annual conference in Boston.
【F5】
Asked if so-called helicopter parents were wasting their money sending their children to music lessons in the belief they could boost their school results, he said "yes".
"Clearly studying music changes the brain, but so does any learning. In fact, that is what learning is." he said.
【F4】
选项
答案
研究人员对167个弹钢琴或其他乐器的小孩进行了性格测试,发现从他们的回答可以预测出他们继续学音乐的可能性。
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/WWbZ777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Ifcomfortablyoutpacingyourrivalsisthemainmeasureofautomotiveachievement,Tesla’selectriccarisaresoundingsuccess
【F1】Breathingparticulate-laden(akasmoggy)airmaybehardeningyourarteriesfasterthannormal,accordingtoresearchpublishe
【F1】Breathingparticulate-laden(akasmoggy)airmaybehardeningyourarteriesfasterthannormal,accordingtoresearchpublishe
【F1】Sendingyourchildtopianoorviolinlessonsinabidtoboosttheiracademicachievementisawasteofmoney,accordingto
【F1】Sendingyourchildtopianoorviolinlessonsinabidtoboosttheiracademicachievementisawasteofmoney,accordingto
【F1】Ican’thelpwonderingwhatCharlesDarwinwouldthinkifhecouldsurveythestateofhisintellectualachievementtoday.2
【F1】Ican’thelpwonderingwhatCharlesDarwinwouldthinkifhecouldsurveythestateofhisintellectualachievementtoday.2
随机试题
茶艺人员在与宾客沟通时,应遵循以下原则
以认知发展为取向的教学设计模式崛起于20世纪五六十年代,它的主要宗旨在于()
Telephone,television,radio,andtheInternethelppeoplecommunicatewitheachother.Becauseofthesedevices,ideasandnews
急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)的免疫表型常为
男性,49岁,因血便、排便次数增多,来院检查,确诊为直肠癌。癌肿距肛门6cm,病人一般情况尚可,肿物可推动,无远处转移。该病人手术方式是()
患者,男,45岁,慢性肾衰竭伴严重水肿,对该患者的护理措施,不正确的是
以下图示()不宜。
以下投资工具中,不属于固定收益投资工具的是()。
对于材料采购途中的合理损耗,下列说法中不正确的有()。
在中国传统观念中,雕塑一直未被看作是与绘画同等的艺术形式;在中国传统学术中,也只有“画学”而没有“雕塑学”。历史上的这种不重视,造成,19世纪末20世纪初,大量具有极高史料研究价值的石雕作品流失海外。而今天,新兴收藏家们的目光也只停留在艺术品的财富表象上,
最新回复
(
0
)