首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy and stagnation. Too much c
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy and stagnation. Too much c
admin
2009-06-24
52
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy and stagnation. Too much conflict leads to divisiveness and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit seeking organizations and other for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision-making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision-making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision-making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents, the executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
选项
A、oversimplified
B、misleading
C、wrong
D、unclear
答案
A
解析
在Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried中,pretty mach表示"相当地,很";cut and dried表示"固有的,一成不变的"。第一段的其他内容即是对这一论述的进一步说明。除了正确理解这两个短语之外,还需要注意第一个词conventional(传统的),在文中看到这一类词时,应意识到本文可能会推翻传统观点,提出新理论。第二段开头即指出,由Schwenk教授所主持的研究表明,冲突存在的最理想状态并非仅凭上述简单的归纳就可以确定,传统的结论过于简单化。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/WgTd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
WhyBuyShade-GrownCoffee?Whenpeopleargueaboutwhethercoffeeisgoodforhealth,they’reusuallythinkingofthehealt
TheDevelopmentofAmericanPostalSystemIntheearlydaysoftheUnitedStates,postalchargeswerepaidbytherecipient
HowTwoGreatConflictsHelpedtoChangeEuropeNinetyyearsagoonasunnymorninginNorthernFrance,somethinghappenedt
Ican’tmakeitbecauseofapreviousengagement.
Accordingtothepassage,someengineersaretryingtoimprovethehandlebarsbecause______.Inparagraph2,theauthormentio
WhatIsaDream?Forcenturies,peoplehavewonderedaboutthestrangethingsthattheydreamabout.Somepsychologistssay
Dr.WilsonandMr.Wanghavemetbefore.
ProfessorWangwentonalecturetourtoEdinburgh.
ProfessorWangwentonalecturetourtoEdinburgh.
ThePrincipalmadefivemajorpointsinhislecturetotheforeignstudents.
随机试题
A.胃肠的D细胞B.小肠的K细胞C.小肠的S细胞D.胃肠的G细胞E.小肠的I细胞分泌促胰液素的是()。
我国的政权组织形式是_________。
患者男,68岁。冠心病心绞痛史10年,1日前突发心前区疼痛入院,经心电图检查,诊断急性前壁心肌梗死。3小时前患者出现胸闷、大汗、面色苍白,体检心率130次/分,律齐,血压75/50mmHg,双肺满布湿哕音。该患者典型的心脏体征描述正确的是
按照拟建项目的“活动”对环境要素的作用属性,环境影响可以划分为()等。
会计人员在工作中“懒”“拖”的不良习惯,违背了会计职业道德规范中的()的基本要求。
下列活动区设置不科学的做法是()。
人民警察在非工作时间内遇到其职责内的紧急情形,应当履行职责。( )
村民暗设铁索圈套捕捉老虎。有只老虎被铁索套系住了一条腿。如果老虎不想被村民抓住,则它必须弄断自己一条腿才可以逃脱;如果老虎不希望弄断一条腿,那么它将无法逃脱系住的铁索圈而葬送七尺之躯。由此可以推出:
中央银行金融监管的目标主要是()
移动互联网是一种通过智能移动终端,采用移动无线通信方式获取业务和服务的新兴业务,其主流操作系统开发平台不包括_____________。
最新回复
(
0
)