首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy and stagnation. Too much c
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy and stagnation. Too much c
admin
2009-06-24
54
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy and stagnation. Too much conflict leads to divisiveness and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit seeking organizations and other for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision-making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision-making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision-making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents, the executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
选项
A、oversimplified
B、misleading
C、wrong
D、unclear
答案
A
解析
在Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried中,pretty mach表示"相当地,很";cut and dried表示"固有的,一成不变的"。第一段的其他内容即是对这一论述的进一步说明。除了正确理解这两个短语之外,还需要注意第一个词conventional(传统的),在文中看到这一类词时,应意识到本文可能会推翻传统观点,提出新理论。第二段开头即指出,由Schwenk教授所主持的研究表明,冲突存在的最理想状态并非仅凭上述简单的归纳就可以确定,传统的结论过于简单化。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/WgTd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
LivingHistoryatJamestownSettlementAwomaninNativeAmericanclothesissittinginthesun,sewingadressfromskin.In
EnglishandEnglishCommunity1.ThereisnodenyingthatEnglishisausefullanguage.ThepeoplewhospeakEnglishtodaymak
ExplanationWhatdoesascientistdowhenheorshe"explains"something?Scientificexplanationcomesintwoforms:generalizat
WhichofthefollowingstatementsaboutFlowersandYeoistrue?Theword"affect"inParagraph6couldbebestreplacedby
TheAmericanIndustryAhistoryoflongandeffortlesssuccesscanbeadreadfulhandicap,but,ifproperlyhandled,itmay
DevelopmentofchemistryChemistrydidnotemergeasascienceuntilafterthescientificrevolutionintheseventeenthcentury
Manyeconomistshavegivenintothefatal(lure)ofmathematics.
Atthemeetingbothsidesexchangedtheirviewsonawidescopeoftopicstheywereinterestedin.
Themainreadersofmedicaljournalsare______.Anarticledealingwithresultsfromdifferentstudiesonthesametopiciscal
Dr.WhiteandMr.Lihavenotmetbefore.
随机试题
提倡“义理、考据、辞章”的作家是【】
A.清化肃肺B.补肾纳气C.温化宣肺D.补肺固卫哮病发作期属寒哮的治法是
麦芽与山楂的共同主治证是()
一名50岁体质较差的女性患者,十二指肠溃疡穿孔20小时,入院施行穿孔修补术后6天体温38℃,腹痛、腹胀,大便次数增多,有黏液,里急后重,诊断为盆腔脓肿。以下治疗措施哪项是错误的
在稳定类基层材料拌合时,应重点检查结合料的剂量、最佳含水量的控制以及拌合方法及均匀性等。()
依据《劳动合同法》,劳动者的权利有()。
( )是对在中华人民共和国境内车辆、船舶(简称车船)的所有人或者管理人所征收的一种税。
发行人在境内发行股票或者可转换公司债券、证券公司在境内承销证券以及投资者认购境内发行的证券,适用()。
下列关于上海行政、司法概况的说法中,正确的有()。
Thethiefwasfinallycapturedtwomilesawayfromthevillage.
最新回复
(
0
)