首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Character Analysis of Shakespearean Plays I. Character analysis —character evaluation as the best way to start the analysis of
Character Analysis of Shakespearean Plays I. Character analysis —character evaluation as the best way to start the analysis of
admin
2014-12-11
20
问题
Character Analysis of Shakespearean Plays
I. Character analysis
—character evaluation as the best way to start the analysis
of a Shakespearean play —characters in a typical 【B1】 doing particular things in 【B1】______
every play
—conflicts involved characters
—characters being on trial
II. Three main reasons for approaching Shakespearean plays
by analyzing characters
A. Plays with active characters like people around us
—the appeal of the genre
—seeing the play as 【B2】 itself 【B2】______
B. Shakespeare’s ability to 【B3】 characters 【B3】______
—individual personality with experience requiring an
evaluation
—individual actors’ need to 【B4】 upon the motivations 【B4】______
for their characters
C. The play including 【B5】 itself, for the reason that 【B5】______
characters are trying to understand their own characters
III. The merits and weaknesses of the approach illustrated
by 【B6】 interpretations of 19th century 【B6】______
A. Values
—always reminding of the central concern — 【B7】 【B7】______
—keeping in touch with the reason why Shakespeare 【B8】 【B8】______
B. Problems
—not enough 【B9】 about characters: 【B9】______
1) key elements full character analysis needs are 【B10】 【B10】______
2) for the lack of evidence, the analysis often ends with
trivial matters.
【B4】
Character Analysis of Shakespearean Plays
Good morning, everyone. Last time I just gave a brief introduction to the Shakespearean play, today we will go further to discuss together how to understand a Shakespearean play. The most obvious way to begin an interpretation of a Shakespearean play is by evaluating the characters. [1] Any play involves characters in a particular setting, doing particular things. The plot will develop a conflict, which will usually inflict pain or distress on some people, and will lead to a final resolution of sorts in which some characters may die or be punished severely, while others survive or triumph or get substantially rewarded. Hence, one clear entry into such a work is to put the characters on trial: Who is good? Who is bad? Why do certain people act in certain ways? Do any of the characters change? Where are my sympathies as I make my way through this play? As an interpreter, I am, in essence, the judge, and how shall I apportion my verdicts?
Interpreting a play by analyzing the characters in it, judging them, and coming to some final evaluation of them is a natural way to approach Shakespeare for three main reasons. The first is that these are plays, and they inevitably feature active characters more or less recognizably like people around us. That, indeed, is the chief appeal of the genre. [2] So it is entirely natural to treat the play as we treat life itself, by responding to the people we see, the actions they carry out, the words they use, and the decisions they make. On the basis of these observations we will come to some conclusions about the characters and will discuss the play in those terms.
[3] The second reason is that Shakespeare is famous, more than anyone else, for his astonishing ability to create interesting, complex, and natural characters. Unlike many other dramatists whose characters do not invite very complex investigation, Shakespeare has the ability to fill a play with scores of characters, each of whom talks in a language and acts in a way which indicates a sharply focused individual personality with a very particular response to experience. Hence, it is, once again, natural to treat them as fully realized people whose conduct requires an evaluative judgment.
Then, too, the fact that we are dealing with plays always keeps the approach through character analysis alive,[4] because theatre productions depend upon individual actors, and individual actors need to reflect upon the motivations for their characters. They have to, in a sense, discover their human qualities and become the stage people whose lives they enact. Thus, the dramatic tradition of continuing to mount Shakespeare productions ensures that the analysis of character will remain a powerful force in the interpretation of the plays.
The third major reason why character analysis is an important approach to Shakespeare’s plays is (as Harold Bloom has repeatedly pointed out) that Shakespeare’s characters are often intrigued or puzzled by their own characters. That is, they make their characters part of the dramatic "problem" of the fiction we are exploring. When, for example, Hamlet or Macbeth or Othello starts to wrestle with his own character, trying to understand his own motivation, feelings, and actions, that moment places the nature of the character as an essential element in the work (in a way that is markedly different from texts in which a character’s personality does not create particular problems for him). [5] In other words, the plays themselves put character analysis directly on the table.
The approach to a Shakespeare play which places the analysis of character at the centre of the process was particularly strong in the nineteenth century, [6] and the literary interpretations from that period often illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of that approach. [7] The great value of character analysis is that it always reminds us that, whatever else we may want to talk of, the central concern is particular human beings. Whatever else King Lear is about, it is centrally about a suffering old man, whose unique character brings upon him almost unimaginable suffering. Whatever we make of Hamlet, we cannot forget that the people in the play drive Ophelia insane and lead her to suicide, and that she is an innocent and loving young woman. [8] Focusing upon the characters in the play always keeps us in touch with a major reason why Shakespeare matters — his works constantly illuminate human nature in all sorts of moving ways.
That said, however, treating the interpretation of a play as primarily a matter of evaluating character can create problems. [9] One major problem, of course, is that in many instances we do not know enough about a character to arrive at a sufficiently full understanding of his or her personality. We know almost nothing of Hamlet’s childhood, or Bolingbroke’s inner thoughts, or Lady Macbeth’s sexuality. [10] Thus, key elements required in any lull character analysis are missing. Of course, we can speculate on such matters, but such speculations can often end up in inconclusive and often trivial debates, because there is not enough evidence. So we can find criticism by the analysis of character degenerating into explorations of the girlhood of Shakespeare’s heroines, endless arguments about whether or not the Macbeths had any children, how old Hamlet might be or whether he is really insane or not, whether Falstaff is a coward or not, how black Othello really is, or what Antony and Cleopatra really talk about when they are alone together. Shakespearean plays are great inheritance as well as wealth for the humankind. The characters in his plays give us lots of insights to know and to talk with Shakespeare’s soul. I hope my lecture has led you on the way to the thought of this great player. Thank you for listening.
选项
答案
reflect
解析
本题所在处同样针对第二个原因。讲座中提到,戏剧通过演员的表演呈现出来,而演员need to reflect upon themotivations for their characters,即需要思考戏剧中人物的动机是什么。本题考查动词reflect。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/WtdO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Twohalf-brothers,SirHumphreyGilbertandSirWalterRaleigh,werethefirstEnglishmentoundertakeseriousventuresinAmeri
Withwoundedpride,theUS,whichisleadingthewartosafeguardpeace,shouldbesupportedbytherestoftheworld.Whileno
_____istheonlyCanadianprovincewithapredominantlyFrench-speakingpopulation.
Earlyanthropologists,followingthetheorythatwordsdeterminethought,believedthatlanguageanditsstructurewereentirel
CharacteristicsofAmericanCultureI.PunctualityA.Goingtothetheaterbe(1)_____twentyminutesprior(1)______B.Eate
A、inexperiencewithnewcompaniesB、lackofknowledgeofthefinancialsectorC、badadvicefromestablishedorganizationsD、lack
在人际关系问题上我们不要太浪漫主义。人是很有趣的,往往在接触一个人时首先看到的都是他或她的优点。这一点颇像是在餐馆里用餐的经验。开始吃头盘或冷碟的时候,印象很好。吃头两个主菜时,也是赞不绝口。愈吃愈趋于冷静,吃完了这顿宴席,缺点就都找出来了。于是转喜为怒,
________,whowereFrench-speaking,achievedthefinalunificationofEngland.
Coldandhotarecalled______antonyms.
GeorgeBernardShawoncewrote,"Therearetwotragediesinlife.Oneistoloseyourheart’sdesire.Theotheristogainit."
随机试题
A、alphabetB、basketC、nakedD、emergencyD选项D画线字母读,其他选项画线字母读[i]。
血氨的主要来源有
男,45岁,在家中食用过期火腿肠,6h后,突起剧烈腹泻,每10~30min腹泻1次,水样便、量多,无发热及腹痛,继之呕吐,口渴、皮肤弹性消失,眼窝凹陷。疑为霍乱。为明确诊断,应立即进行的检查是()
急性肾盂肾炎患者的正确护理是( )。【历年考试真题】
下列表述中何者为影响法官内部独立的行为?()
我国企业编制的资产负债表的基本格式属于()。
甲是某地远近有名的养马专业户,乙需要买四匹马,来找甲商议。甲乙通过协商,商定四匹马共5000元,但乙不放心,甲对乙说:“你不放心可以先把马牵回去试用,如果一个月内觉得可以,你就买下来。如果觉得不满意,就把马给我牵回来,没事的。”乙很高兴,就将四匹马牵走了,
实验(Krueger,1929)表明,记忆效率最高的过度学习在()。(西南大学)
意大利著名哲学家克罗齐说:“过去的错误的学说不宜忘掉不谈,因为各种真理都要在和错误斗争之中,才能维持他们的生命。”这说明
Whenamagazineforhighschoolstudentsaskeditsreaderswhatlifewouldbelikeintwentyyears.Theysaidmachineswouldbe
最新回复
(
0
)