首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Part Ⅱ Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning) Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage q
Part Ⅱ Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning) Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage q
admin
2010-11-02
41
问题
Part Ⅱ Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning)
Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions on Answer Sheet I. For questions 1-7, choose the best answer from the four choices marked A), B), C) and D). For questions 8-10, complete the sentences with the information given in the passage.
Rich Man, Poor Man
Gluers and sawyers from the furniture factories in Galax near the mountains of Virginia lost their jobs last year when American retailers decided they could find a better supplier in China. At the other end of the furniture industry Robert Nardelli lost his job this month when Home Depot decided it could find a better chief executive in his deputy. But any likeness ends there. Mr. Nardelli’s exit was as extravagantly rewarded as his occupation of the corner office had been. Next to his $ 210 million severance pay, the redundant woodworkers packages were mean to the point of provocation (激怒).
That’s the way it goes all over the rich world. If you look back 20 years, the total pay of the typical top American manager has increased from roughly 40 times the average--the level for four decades -- to 110 times the average now. These are the glory days of global capitalism. The mix of technology and economic integration transforming the world has created unparalleled prosperity. In the past five years the world has seen faster growth than at any time since the early 1970s. Having joined the global labor force, hundreds of millions of people in developing countries have won the chance to escape squalor (肮脏) and poverty. Hundreds of millions more stand to join them.
That promises to improve the lot of humanity as a whole incalculably. But in the rich world labor’s share of GDP has fallen to historic lows, while profits are soaring. A clamor is abroad that Mr. Nardelli and his friends among the top hundredth -- or even the top thousandth -- of the population are seizing the lion’s share of globalization’s gains. Meanwhile everyone else -- not just blue-collar factory workers but also the wider office -- working middle class -- shuffles along, grimly waiting for the next round of cost-cuts.
Fear and clothing
Signs of a backlash abound. Stephen Roach, the chief economist at Morgan Stanley, has counted 27 pieces of anti-China legislation in Congress since early 2005. The German Marshall Fund found last year that, although most people still say they favor free trade, more than half of Americans want to protect domestic companies from foreign competition even if that slows economic growth. In a hint of labor’s possible resurgence, the House of Representatives has just voted to raise the federal minimum wage for the first time in a decade. Even Japan is alarmed about inequality, stagnant (不景气的) wages and jobs going to China. Europe has tied itself in knots trying to "manage" trade in Chinese textiles.
Should you blame your computer?
The panic comes in part from a rush to lump all the blame on globalization. Technology -- an even less resistible force -- is also destroying white- and blue-collar tasks in a puff of automation and may play a bigger role in explaining rising wage inequality. The distinctions between technology and globalization count, if only because people tend to welcome computers but condemn foreigners (whether as competitors or immigrants). That makes technology easier to defend.
For economists, the debate about whether technology or globalization is responsible for capital’s rewards outpacing those of labor is crucial, complicated and unresolved. One school, which blames globalization, argues that the rocketing profits and sluggish middling wages of the past few years are the long-lasting results of trade, as all those new developing-country workers enter the labor market. This school says that technology helps workers by increasing their productivity and benefits them in other aspects. The opposing school retorts(反驳) that technology does not increase wages immediately as they blaming globalization say, and some sorts of information technology seem to boost the returns to capital instead.
The first rule is to avoid harming the very miracle that generates so much wealth. Take for instance the arguments about high executive pay. Some say this is simply a matter of governance -- and forcing company boards to work better. If only it were that simple. High pay is, by and large, the price needed to attract and motivate gifted managers, as our special report argues in this issue. The abuses of companies such as Home Depot obscure how most high pay has been caused not by powerful bosses fixing their own wages, but by the changing job of the chief executive, the growth of large companies and the competitive market for talent. Executive-pay restrictions would not put that horse back in its box, but they would harm companies.
If the winners are difficult to curb without doing damage to your economy, the losers are tough to help. Doling out aid for the victims of trade makes sense in theory; but in practice it is increasingly hard to do. When the jobs going abroad are not whole assembly lines, but bits of departments, how exactly do you pick out the person who has lost his job to globalization from the millions of people changing jobs for other reasons? And, hardhearted though it may sound, most of the gains from trade and technology alike come from the way they redeploy investment and labor to activities that create more wealth. That, like all change, can be painful; but it is what makes a country richer. A policy locking people into jobs that could be better done elsewhere is self-defeating.
The limits of redistribution
If protectionism will not help the losers, what about using the tax system? Some argue that redistributing more cash from the Nardellis to the Galaxians would not just make society less unequal; it would also buy middle-class support for globalization. In fact the two arguments should be kept separate.
This newspaper has long argued that a mobile society is better than an equal one: disparities are tolerable if combined with meritocracy and general economic advance. For decades America has shown how dynamic economies are better than equality-driven ones at generating overall prosperity. That still leaves plenty of room to debate how progressive to make taxation, or how lavish to make public services. But a society would want compelling evidence that the social contract had been torn up before flexing the tax system to offset what may turn out to be only temporary fluctuations in relative incomes. And it makes little sense for free-traders to use taxes to buy off people from voting for protectionism, when doing so would in any case be against their interests.
Active, not reactive
Instead, the way to ease globalization is the same as the way to ease other sorts of economic change, including the impact of technology. The aim is to help people to move jobs as comparative advantage shifts rapidly from one activity to the next. That means less friction in labor markets and regulatory systems that help investment. It means an education system that equips people with general skills that make them mobile. It means detaching health care and pensions from employment, so that every time you move your job, you are not risking an awful lot else besides. And for those who lose their jobs -- from whatever cause -- it means beefing up assistance: generous training and active policies to help them find work.
None of that comes cheap -- and much of it takes years to work. But an economy that gains from globalization can more easily find the money to pay for it all. The business people and politicians gathering on their Swiss Alp next week should certainly spend more time worrying about the citizens of Galax; but they also need to be far more courageous about defending a process that can do so much good even if its impact can sometimes appear so cruel.
According to the first rule, high executive pay is ______.
选项
A、nothing but a problem concerning governance
B、due to the abuses of power
C、unrelated with bosses’ decisions
D、provided for managers so that it would harm companies
答案
C
解析
虽然该段第三句提及过选项A,但这只是一部分人的说法,并且该段第四句使用了if only引导的虚拟语气对其前一句加以否定,故A错误。选项Cunrelated with bosses’ decisions与第六句中的not by powerful bosses fixing their own wages属于同义转述,故C为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Wus7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Directions:Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledEnergyShortage:HowtoSolveIt.Youshou
A、Youshouldbelieveeverythingyouread.B、Shethinksthebookisexcellent.C、Shewonderswhichnewspaperhereads.D、Reaction
Directions:Forthispart,youareallowedthirtyminutestowriteashortessayentitledHowtoDealwithDisobedientBehaviors
Theevolutionofspeechmayhavebeenthemostimportantfactorofall.Whenearlymanmasteredtheloom(工具)oflanguage,hisp
Directions:Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledYouth.Youshouldwriteatleast150word
TheAmericanwarondrugshasgottenallthetypeinrecentyears,butalcoholismisstillthenation’smostserious【B1】______.
Bymakingvehicleslighterinweight,aluminum____________________(大减少了开动它们所需的燃料).
TodayIwouldliketotalkabouttheearlydaysofmoviemakinginthelatenineteenthandearly【B1】______centuries.Beforet
TodayIwouldliketotalkabouttheearlydaysofmoviemakinginthelatenineteenthandearly【B1】______centuries.Beforet
A、ByMay29th.B、ByJune29th.C、ByJuly29th.D、ByApril29th.B推理判断题I考频:9]。申请人应该在不晚于学期开始前两个月(nolaterthantwomonthsbeforet
随机试题
圆盘剪切机只能剪切曲线。()
A、具有关节唇B、两侧为联合关节C、属于复关节D、可做环转运动E、可做收、展运动颞下颌关节
重度营养不良患儿调整饮食,每日开始供给的热量应是
现有某待开发项目建筑面积为3850m2,从当前开始开发期为2年。根据市场调查分析,该项目建成时可出售50%,半年和一年后分别售出其余的30%和20%,出售的平均单价为28507元/m2,若折现率为15%,则该项目开发完成后的总价值的当前现值为()万
下列建设工程项目进度控制工作中,属于施工方进度控制任务的是()。
某小区的80%的住户是年龄在60岁以上的老年人,调查发现,多年来,该小区内超市的甜味点心销售远低于其他味道的点心。甜味点心所处的需求状况是()。
某企业2009年度赊销收入净额为2000万元,销售成本为1600万元;年初、年末应收账款余额分别为100万元和400万元;年初、年末存货余额分别为200万元和600万元。该企业年末现金为560万元,流动负债为800万元,假定该企业流动资产由速动资产和存货
Peoplehavebeenholdingheateddiscussionsrecentlyaboutwomen’sexperienceintheworkplace.LastmonthSherylSandberg,chie
N名学生的成绩己在主函数中放入一个带头节点的链表结构中,h指向链表的头节点。请编写函数fun,它的功能是:求出平均分,由函数值返回。例如,若学生的成绩是:85,76,69,85,91,72,64,87,则平均分应当是:78.625。注意:部分源程序在文
若在数据库中有"教师"表(教师号、教师名)、"学生"表(学号、学生名)和"课程"表(课程号,课程名)等3个基本情况表。学校里一名教师可主讲多门课程,一名学生可选修多门课程,则主讲教师与学生之间形成了多对多的师生关系。为反映这种师生关系,在数据库中应增加
最新回复
(
0
)