首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Is the professional book reviewer old-fashioned? In a recent Harvard Business School study of nonfiction reviews, assessments in
Is the professional book reviewer old-fashioned? In a recent Harvard Business School study of nonfiction reviews, assessments in
admin
2013-09-16
67
问题
Is the professional book reviewer old-fashioned? In a recent Harvard Business School study of nonfiction reviews, assessments in mainstream media outlets and amateur ratings on Amazon largely converged. Assuming we can trust the questionable verdict of mere consensus, surely we could dump the Review section and decide what to read purely by consulting peers online?
Nevertheless, traditional reviewers still serve a function. Few Amazon users will explore a book with the depth of an 800-word review. Supportive quotes are a virtual obligation of the form in print, since especially appraisals of style require substantiation, yet most Amazon reviewers applaud or deplore an author’s prose without providing examples, and you just have to take their word for it. Granted, critics are often scorned as clubby in-fighters either championing their friends or settling old scores.
Yet many Amazon reviewers are just as snotty, overblown and acid as the worst of the "tits" in the Times Literary Supplement. A few small-minded pros may indeed be brown-nosing or out for revenge, but most critics with a shred of integrity refuse to review authors they know. Besides, Amazon suffers from corruption as well; friends-and-family boosters can inflate a listing with flattery; rivals and personal adversaries can pump it with poison. Some review sections may be suspected of assigning books whose publishers advertise in the paper, but Amazon’s emailed "recommendations" are paid for by publishers, no doubt.
As for accuracy of assessment, Amazon reviews tend to gather populist momentum, mix together into a group-think that discourages dissenters. Able to check online for what’s already out there before filing, insecure professional critics are likewise prone to go safely with the popular tide. But the best reviewers will stick their necks out, sometimes defending a misunderstood book against a deluge of denunciation, or objecting that a fashionably crowned "masterpiece" isn’t all it’s cracked up to be.
Still, when executed responsibly, reviewing requires many hours of reading that modest fees don’t begin to compensate. Reviewers are not all grinding an axe or scratching a back. They try to put an author’s work in context, to advance a more constructive argument than "I didn’t like it", and to make a few halfway amusing observations along the way. When they pan a work, hoping to save you time and money, they risk making an enemy of the author for life.
Anyway, why not read the Review section and go online? Then, if both the pros and the amateurs turn out to be wrong, these days you’ve got multiple forums in which to say so. I might defend the reviewing trade, but a handful of haughty hired hands no longer having the last word on books is not a bad thing. According to that Harvard study, professional critics are influenced by awards and hype, while regular readers are less prone to being concealed and more open to new writers. So between the two sources, we should all find the ultimate
Holy Grail.
It can be inferred from Paragraph 5 that best reviewers______.
选项
A、usually spend more money than they earn
B、know very well about the author
C、are very likely to cause offence to the author
D、provide readers with definite judgments
答案
C
解析
[A]选项陷阱在于第五段首句提及“负责任的评论工作付出可能没有得到多”,但并不能由此推出“好评论者会人不敷出”,所以排除。[B]选项陷阱在于第四段第二句“最好的评论者会为了捍卫一本遭人误解的书免遭狂轰滥炸的谴责而挺身而出”以及第五段第三句“好评论者将作者作品置于大背景下去理解揣摩”可能令读者主观推出“好评论者对作者很了解”。但作者在此无意讲述“评论者与作者个人关系问题”,而是在具体讲述“好评论者的行为标准”,所以错误。[D]选项误将第五段第三句to advance a more constructive argument than“I didn’t like it”,错误理解为“他们给读者提供明确评论”,该选项实则和文意“好的评论者不在于对作品给出定论”相反。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/XBO4777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
YourroommateMarytransferredtoanotherschoolafewdaysago.Writeraletterto:1)expressyourfeelingofmissing;
ByquotinggovernorSchwarzenegger’sremark,theauthorintendstoAccordingtothepassage,Californiahasthehighestrateof
AccordingtoAnneKrueger,long-termgovernmentprotectiongiventosteelcompaniesTheU.S.integratedsteelcompaniesbelieve
Accordingtothetext,thereasonforcosmeticsurgeryistoThestatement"drawsthelineatoperatingonpeople"(Para.2)is
Punishmentdependsasmuchonpoliticsasitdoesoncrime:crimerateshavebeenstableinrecentyearsbutthere’sbeenastri
Punishmentdependsasmuchonpoliticsasitdoesoncrime:crimerateshavebeenstableinrecentyearsbutthere’sbeenastri
Punishmentdependsasmuchonpoliticsasitdoesoncrime:crimerateshavebeenstableinrecentyearsbutthere’sbeenastri
随机试题
焊接结构质量验收依据的检验文件中没有()。
寒邪直中三阴,真阳衰微,症见恶寒蜷卧,四肢厥冷,吐泻腹痛,口不渴,神疲欲寐,脉沉微者,治宜选用
下列说法正确的是
坡道的常用坡度一般为()。
在保持流动性及水泥用量不变的条件下使用减水剂,可使混凝土()。
Whenweanalyzethesaltsalinity(盐浓度)ofoceanwaters,wefindthatitvariesonlyslightlyfromplacetoplace.Nevertheless,s
下列情形中,构成徇私枉法罪的是()。
为了删除列表框中的一个列表项,应使用的列表框方法是
WhichoneofthefollowingisINCORRECT?
春运(Chunyun)是指中国春节前后一段时期里出现的一种高负荷交通运输,一般从春节前15天开始,持续约40天。对大多数中国人来说,在春节期间与家人团聚是一个悠久的传统。人们从工作、读书的地方回到家里,在除夕夜与家人一起吃团圆饭春运期间的客流量(pass
最新回复
(
0
)