首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Ever since it appeared on the cultural scene, the Enlightenment has had its passionate critics. Philosophers as well as politici
Ever since it appeared on the cultural scene, the Enlightenment has had its passionate critics. Philosophers as well as politici
admin
2012-03-21
51
问题
Ever since it appeared on the cultural scene, the Enlightenment has had its passionate critics. Philosophers as well as politicians have criticized its rationalism, its individualism, its cosmopolitanism, its faith in science and technology, its humanism, and its lack of respect for established traditions. Some have criticized individual aspects of it, others have condemned it in its entirety. At times Enlightenment thinking was all but eclipsed, as during the later part of the period of literary Romanticism, while at other times it resurfaced with renewed vigor. In varying ways it has had a challenged and challenging presence in Western thought to this day.
In recent decades Enlightenment thinking has been the target of critical endeavors once more. This time it is its individualism and cosmopolitanism that have come under persistent attack from various quarters, together with its attempt to find and formulate universally valid norms and values. Anti-Enlightenment initiatives have surfaced inside the United States as well as worldwide. They are often launched in the name of "multiculturalism", "ethnic identity", the supposed importance of "roots", and the general importance of "difference" as opposed to people’s common humanity. With respect to social integration, advocates of ethnic separateness prefer cultural and racial "salad bowls" to the traditional American "melting pot."
At issue is the Enlightenment idea that ideally every individual should not only have the right, but even the obligation to determine for himself or herself who he or she wants to be, what sort of life he or she wants to live, or with whom he or she wants to associate more closely. An individual, in other words, should not be obliged by any group to adhere to "his" or "her" religion, ethnicity, race, or social tradition, but be allowed and encouraged to make personal choices in all these regards — in effect be entirely free of any such particularistic determinations, if that seems best to the person in question. Essentially individuals are not seen by Enlightenment thinkers as members of particular groups, but as "citizens of the world," as unencumbered inhabitants of a polity that is governed by laws that in principle are valid for all human beings.
People will, of course, be bora into specific communities that may be distinguished from each other by various racial or cultural traits. But these distinguishing traits are not particularly important, according to Enlightenment thinking — not nearly as important as that which all human beings have in common, namely reason. While Enlightenment theoreticians will acknowledge or even welcome variety among human beings, they are far more serious about what potentially unites them, and about what should accrue to them on account of their common humanity.
If in most societies — often after long and costly battles — laws have been passed which prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, creed, gender, or national origin, then an important Enlightenment principle has been realized? the principle that every individual is first a human being, and only secondarily a member of particular groups. And while recognition of one’s common humanity may not necessarily be in conflict with being a member of any particular group, the principle demands that if there is a conflict, then people’s common humanity takes precedence over any particularity. What is important, in other words, is not that I am Christian, Black, or Sioux, but that I am a human being, and that as such I have certain basic rights? the right of self-determination most prominently among them. Any attempt on the part of any group to declare their particularity as primary vis-a-vis someone’s basic humanity is an outdated prejudice, and an infringement on a person’s basic rights, as far as Enlightenment thinking is concerned. Particularism and its divisiveness — all too often the cause of contempt, hatred, fanaticism, and wars — is essentially a thing of the past. Progress consists in the ever growing realization that all human beings are fundamentally the same, and that their important needs and rights as individuals are universal.
The Enlightenment thinkers are deeply concerned about______.
选项
A、what kinds of communities, people are born into
B、the various traits of races and cultures
C、what makes people so various
D、what brings people together
答案
D
解析
细节理解题。从第四段可得知。启蒙时期的思想者们承认人类出生在不同的社会全体中,承认由此造成的文化、种族等差别,但是这并不是他们关心的重点,他们真正关心的是是什么使得不同的人聚集在一起。故答案A、B、C都不正确。从此段中最后一句话可得出答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/XBmK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Researchershaveestablishedthatwhenpeoplearementallyengaged,biochemicalchangesoccurinthebrainthatallowittoact
MasstransportationrevisedthesocialandeconomicfabricoftheAmericancityinthreefundamentalways.Itcatalyzedphysical
VirusesFindNewWaystoWormintoComputersJustwhenyouthoughtyouknewacomputervirusorwormwhenyousawone,seve
The______ofaculturalphenomenonisusuallyalogicalconsequenceofsomephysicalaspectinthelifestyleofthepeople.
Generallyspeaking,______immigrantscannottotallycutthetiewiththeirmotherlandandbeassimilatedbytheforeigncultur
Thecompetitionamongproducersofpersonalcomputersisessentiallyaracetogetthebest,mostinnovativeproductstothemar
Ifyouwantthispainkiller,you’llhavetoaskthedoctorfora______.
Whathappenedtothetwolargejets?
Paintinghasbeencontinuouslypracticedbyhumansforsome20,000years.Togetherwithotheractivities【C1】______ritualistic
Hisstrongsenseofhumorwas______makeeveryoneintheroomburstoutlaughing.
随机试题
加涅把智慧技能分成五个层次,由低到高分别是()。
X射线通过人体后,透射线强度与原射线的关系是
A.1日常用量B.不超过15日常用量C.不超过3日常用量D.不超过7日常用量医疗机构门诊开具第二类精神药品片剂,每张处方用量要求为
心源性水肿的主要致病因素是
就土地所有权与使用权两者之间的关系而言,土地使用制可大致分为土地所有权与使用权相结合和土地所有权与使用权相分离两大类。()
施工临时工程是为辅助主体工程施工所必须修建的生产和生活用临时性工程。其由()、其他施工临时工程组成。
私募基金管理人在备案私募基金时,应如实填报的信息包括()。 Ⅰ.基金名称 Ⅱ.资本规模 Ⅲ.投资者 Ⅳ.基金合同
影像是历史的眼睛,也是现实的摄魂术。它是对世界忠直的观察、记录、发现,而非对世界的提纯、美化,或者丑化。伍尔芙说图像“不是争论”,“它们就是事实直接对眼睛所说的未经加工的声明”。这个由机器所做的记录,当然比文字更加中立、客观、可信。而我们能够将一些不该忘却
()模式注重任务目标的实现,以解决实质社会问题为主要工作取向。
行政诉讼中只能采用合议制审判方式。()
最新回复
(
0
)