首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A triumph for scientific freedom This week’s Nobel Prize winners in medicine—Australians Barry J. Marshall and J. Robin Warr
A triumph for scientific freedom This week’s Nobel Prize winners in medicine—Australians Barry J. Marshall and J. Robin Warr
admin
2010-01-10
16
问题
A triumph for scientific freedom
This week’s Nobel Prize winners in medicine—Australians Barry J. Marshall and J. Robin Warren— toppled the conventional wisdom in more ways than one. They proved that most ulcers were caused by a lowly bacterium, which was an outrageous idea at the time. But they also showed that if science is to advance, scientists need the freedom and the funding to let their imaginations roam.
Let’s start with the Nobel pair’s gut instincts. In the late 1970s, the accepted medical theory was that ulcers were caused by stress, smoking, and alcohol. But when pathologist Warren cranked up his microscope to a higher-than-usual magnification, he was surprised to find S-shaped bacteria in specimens taken from patients with gastritis. By 1982, Marshall, only 30 years old and still in training at Australia’s Royal Perth Hospital, and Warren, the more seasoned physician to whom he was assigned, were convinced that the bacteria were living brazenly in a sterile, acidic zone—the stomach—that medical texts had declared uninhabitable.
Marshall and Warren’s attempts to culture the bacteria repeatedly failed. But then they caught a lucky breaker rather, outbreak. Drug-resistant staph was sweeping through the hospital. Preoccupied with the infections, lab techs left Marshall’s and Warren’s petri dishes to languish in a dark, humid incubator over the long Easter holiday. Those five days were enough time to grow a crop of strange, translucent microbes.
Marshall later demonstrated that ulcer-afflicted patients harbored the same strain of bacteria. In 1983, he began successfully treating these sufferers with antibiotics and bismuth (the active ingredient in Pepto-Bismol). That same year, at an infectious disease conference in Belgium, a questioner in the audience asked Marshall if he thought bacteria caused at least some stomach ulcers. Marshall shot back that he believed bacteria caused all stomach ulcers.
Those were fighting words. The young physician from Perth was telling the field’s academically pedigreed experts that they had it all wrong. "It was impossible to displace the dogma," Marshall explained to me in a jaunty, wide-ranging conversation several years ago. "Their agenda was to shut me up and get me out of gastroenterology and into general practice in the outback."
At first, Marshall couldn’t produce the crowning scientific proof of his claim: inducing ulcers in animals by feeding them the bacterium. So in 1984, as he later reported in the Medical Journal of Australia. "a 32-year-old man, a light smoker and social drinker who had no known gastrointestinal disease or family history of peptic ulceration"—a superb test subject, in other words—" swallowed the growth from’ a flourishing three-day culture of the isolate."
The volunteer was Marshall himself, Five days later, and for seven mornings in a row, he experienced the classic and unpretty symptoms of severe gastritis.
Helicobacter pylori have since been blamed not only for the seething inflammation ,of ulcers but also for virtually all stomach cancer. Marshall’s antibiotic treatment has replaced surgery as standard care. And the wise guy booed off the stage at scientific meetings has just won the Nobel Prize.
What does all this have to do with scientific freedom? Today, US government funding favors "hypothesis-driven" rather than "hypothesis-generating" research. In the former, a scientist starts with a safe supposition and conducts the experiment to prove or disprove the idea. "If you want to get research funding; you better make sure that you’ve got the experiment half done," Marshall told me. "You have to prove it works before they’ll fund you to test it out."
By contrast, in hypothesis-generating research, the scientist inches forward by hunch, gathering clues and speculating on their meaning. The payoff is never clear. With today’s crimped science budgets and intense competition for grants, such risky research rarely gets funded. Proceeding on intuition, Mar- shall told me, "is a luxury that not many researchers have."
It helps, he added, to be an outsider. "The people who have got a stake in the old technology arc never the ones to embrace the new technology. It’s always someone a bit on the periphery--who hasn’t got anything to gain by the status quo—who is interested in changing it."
Today, US government funding favors ______ rather than ______ research.
选项
答案
“hypothesis-driven”;“hypothesis-generation”
解析
答案在第九段第一句
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/XCt7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
【B1】【B5】
Accordingtothepassage,developmentalistswouldagreewithwhichofthefollowingviews?Theauthorbelievesthat______.
Theword"staple"(Line1,Para.1)probablymeans"______".Theauthorthinksthatareporter’sdutyonthesceneofanaccident
A、Theyareself-evident.B、Theyareyettobeproved.C、Theyaretobefurtherstudied.D、Theyaresupportedbyscientificevide
WaltandhisbrotherRoyworkedtogether______.MickeyMousearrivedontheworld’sculturalstage______.
Whenwetellothersinformation,wealsoexpressourfeelingsatthesametime.Someproductsthatmoviestarsrecommendsarer
A、Asickfriend.B、Amathclass.C、Schoolpolicy.D、Theman’stest.CWhatdothespeakersmainlydiscuss?
Societywasfascinatedbyscienceandthingsscientificinthenineteenthcentury.Greatbreakthroughsinengineering,theuseo
ThedisputeonDPRK’snuclearprogrammeissuegivesanegativeinfluenceonUS-DPRKrelations.Theword"omnipotent"inthefir
随机试题
A.行政处罚简易程序B.行政处罚一般程序C.行政处罚听证程序D.行政处分E.刑事处罚违法事实清楚、情节轻微,拟给予警告时,适用于
A.一级召回B.二级召回C.三级召回D.四级召回E.五级召回《药品召回管理办法》规定对可能引起暂时的或者可逆的健康危害的药品召回为
请分析甲一稿多投的行为以及北风社与甲的专有出版合同的效力。传奇社的转载行为是否符合著作权法的要求?为什么?传奇社可否对作品进行文字性删节?
根据《人民防空工程设计防火规范》规定,人防工程内严禁存放()。
某企业年初未分配利润为100万元,本年实现的净利润为200万元,按10%和5%分别提取法定盈余公积和法定公益金,则该企业可供投资者分配的利润为()万元。
企业法人的职能部门提供保证,且债权人知道保证人为企业法人的职能部门的,因此造成的损失,保证人与债权人承担连带责任。()
为帮助会计报表使用者正确、全面理解相关信息,注册会计师应当在会计报表组成部分的审计报告后附送整体会计报表。 ( )
法定代表人既是法人的代表人,也是法人机关的一种。()
阅读下列材料。回答问题。民革上海市委长期关注公共财政问题,曾以此为题连续两年在市政协全会上作大会发言。“财政预算科目分‘类、款、项、目、节’五个层次,但目前政府向人大代表提交的财政信息大多是到‘款’,有的仅仅为‘类’,人大代表要在全会会期内,全面
进程P1、P2、P3、P4和P5的前趋图如下图所示:若用PV操作控制进程P1、P2、P3、P4和P5并发执行的过程,则需要设置5个信号量S1、S2、S3、S4和S5,且信号量S1~S5的初值都等于零。下图中a和b处应分别填入(1);c和d处应分别填入(
最新回复
(
0
)