首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
admin
2012-04-23
44
问题
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even create the next Google. Better yet, this plan won’t cost the government a dime. In fact, it will save a lot of money. But few politicians are going to want to touch it. Here’s the plan: More immigration. A pathway to legal status for undocumented immigrants. And a recognition that immigration policy is economic policy, and needs to be thought of as such.
See what I meant about politicians not liking it?
Economists will tell you that immigrants raise wages for the average native-born worker. They’ll tell you that they make things cheaper for us to buy here, and that if we didn’t have immigrants for some of these jobs, the jobs would move to other countries. They’ll tell you that we should allow for much more highly skilled immigration, because that’s about as close to a free lunch as you’re likely to find. They’ll tell you that the people who should most want a path to legal status for undocumented immigrants are the low-income workers who are most opposed to such plans. And about all this, the economists are right.
There are also noneconomic considerations, of course. Integrating cultures and nationalities is difficult. Undocumented immigrants raise issues of law and fairness. Border security is important. Those questions are important. They’re just not the subject of this column.
The mistake we make when thinking about the effect immigrants have on our wages, says Giovanni Peri, an economist at the University of California at Davis who has studied the issue extensively, is we imagine an economy where the number of jobs is fixed. Then, if one immigrant comes in, he takes one of those jobs or forces a worker to accept a lower wage. But that’s not how our economy works. With more labor—particularly more labor of different kinds—the economy grows larger. It produces more stuff. There are more workers buying things and that increases the total number of jobs. We understand perfectly well that Europe is in trouble because its low birth rates mean fewer workers and that means less economic growth. We ourselves worry that we’re not graduating enough scientists and engineers. But the economy doesn’t care if it gets workers through birth rates or green cards.
In fact, there’s a sense in which green cards are superior. Economists separate new workers into two categories: Those who "substitute" for existing labor—we’re both construction workers, and the boss can easily swap you out for me; and those who "complement" existing labor—you’re a construction engineer and I’m a construction worker. Immigrants, more so than U.S.-born workers, tend to be in the second category, as the jobs you want to give to someone who doesn’t speak English very well and doesn’t have many skills are different from the jobs you give to people who are fluent and have more skills.
But that’s only half of their benefit. "Living standards are a function of two things," says Michael Greenstone, director of the Hamilton Project, which is hosting a Washington conference on the economics of immigration next week. "They’re a function of our wages and the prices of the goods we purchase. " And immigrants reduce the prices of those goods. Patricia Cortes, an economist at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, found that immigrants lowered the prices in "immigrant-intensive industries" like housekeeping and gardening by about 10 percent. So our wages go up and the prices of the things we want to buy go down.
We should remember, though, that the average worker isn’t every worker. A study by Harvard economists George Borjas and Lawrence Katz found that although immigrants raised native wages overall, they slightly hurt the 8 percent of workers without a high-school education and those with a college education. A subsequent study by Peri looked harder at the ways immigrant labor differed from native labor and found that all groups of workers saw a benefit from immigrants—though unskilled workers saw less of a benefit than highly skilled workers.
And unskilled workers face even tougher competition from undocumented immigrants who, because their status is so tenuous, will accept pay beneath the minimum wage. And they are unlikely to complain about safety regulations or work conditions. That takes unskilled immigrants from being a bit cheaper than unskilled natives and makes them a lot cheaper—which makes employers likelier to hire them for jobs that native workers could do better.
This suggests, first, that American workers would be better off if we figured out a way to take the 12 million undocumented immigrants and give them legal status, and second, that we might want to give them more direct help if we’re going to increase immigration. Both are possible—just politically difficult.
Our immigration policy should be primarily oriented around our national goals. And one goal is to have the world’s most innovative and dynamic economy. It’s never going to be the case that each and every one of the planet’s most talented individuals is born on American soil. But those born elsewhere could be lured here. People like living here. We should be leveraging that advantage, mercilessly roaming the globe, finding the most talented people and attracting them to our country. When we have the best talent, we have the best innovations. That’s how we landed Google, Intel, and the atomic bomb. Immigrants are about twice as likely as native-born Americans to start a small business, and they’re 30 percent more likely to apply for a patent.
Which of the following is NOT the benefit of immigration?
选项
A、Immigration will help the economy grow and increase the total number of jobs.
B、Immigration will increase the wages and decrease the prices of goods.
C、Immigration will make skilled native workers face even tougher competition.
D、Immigration will attract the most talented people to the country.
答案
C
解析
首先,要看清题目,找出不正确的选项。所给的三个选项A、B和D分别可从第五段、第七段和第十一段中得出均为正确的答案,而选项C与原文第九段内容不符。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/XGiO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Languageissaidtobearbitrarybecausethereisnologicalconnectionbetweenmeaningsand______.
JonasFrisenhadhiseurekamomentin1997.Backthen,scientistssuspectedthattherewasaspecialtypeofcellinthebraint
LanguageFamiliesAllofthelanguageswithinalanguagefamilyare【1】andallofthemhaveasimilarhistory.Let’stakeabr
Theworldisgoingthroughthebiggestwaveofmergersandacquisitionseverwitnessed.TheprocesssweepsfromhyperactiveAmer
Asoundcanchangebecauseoftheinfluenceofanadjacentsound.Thisisknownasassimilation.Whichofthefollowingwordsis
Ablindbabyisdoublyhandicapped.Notonlyisitunabletosee,butbecauseitcannotreceivethevisualstimulusfromitsenv
20世纪末的中国,经过新民主主义革命,已非20世纪初的中国,但是我们一直到了1979年,才真正地找到了“发展才是硬件”的道理,似乎是太晚了一点。如果我们在1949年建国之后,在清除旧社会残渣余孽的同时,把主要精力放在发展经济这个“硬件”上世纪末的中国将会是
A、FatahPartyintendedtoirritatethemilitantgroupHamas.B、FatahPartywantedtostrengthenthelegislativepower.C、FatahP
中国是一个地域辽阔、有着数千年悠久历史的多民族国家,有着秀丽的自然风光、众多的名胜古迹和丰富多彩的灿烂文化,旅游资源十分丰富。改革开放以来,中国经济以年平均近10%的速度持续增长,各项事业蓬勃发展,人民生活水平显著提高,为旅游业的兴旺奠定了坚实的基础。中国
WhenLewisZiskawantedtoseehowawarmerwoodwithmorecarbondioxideintheairwouldaffectcertainplants,hedidn’tset
随机试题
并非所有的教授都没有博士学位,因此,有些具有博士学位的人享有很高的学术声望。为使上述推理成立,必须补充以下哪项作为前提?
胆碱的生理功能不包括
A.2年B.3年C.5年D.7年E.10年药品批准文号有效期()
某省重点工程项目,由于工程复杂,技术难度高,一般施工队伍难以胜任,建设单位自行决定采取邀请招标方式。共有A、B、C、D、E、F、G、H8家施工单位通过了资格预审,并于规定的时间9月10~16日购买了招标文件。招标文件中规定,10月18日下午4时是投标截止时
图4—39所示机构中,杆O1A=02B,O1A//O2B,杆O2C=O3D,O2C//O3D,且O1A=20cm,O2C=40cm,CM=MD=30cm,若杆O1A以角速度ω=3rad/s匀速转动,则M点速度的大小和B点加速度的大小分别为()。
整个设备工程项目信息的分发和检索一般都是采用(),使用计算机软件来保证信息能及时、准确地送达信息需求部门。
丙找甲借自行车,甲的自行车与乙的很相像,均放于楼下车棚。丙错认乙车为甲车,遂把乙车骑走。甲告知丙骑错车,丙未理睬。某日,丙骑车购物,将车放在商店楼下,因墙体倒塌将车砸坏。下列表述正确的是
Whenmengrowolder,theirhairoftenbeginstofallout.Whenhairbeginstofallout【C1】______oldage,itisimpossibletomak
Themostconsistentlyidentifiedteachereffectivenessvariableistimeontask.Thatis,themoretimethatstudentsspendon
Inthe1980s,homeschoolingmadeacomebackintheU.S.whenreligiouslyconservativeparentsconvincedstatestoapproveandgi
最新回复
(
0
)