首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
admin
2012-04-23
33
问题
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even create the next Google. Better yet, this plan won’t cost the government a dime. In fact, it will save a lot of money. But few politicians are going to want to touch it. Here’s the plan: More immigration. A pathway to legal status for undocumented immigrants. And a recognition that immigration policy is economic policy, and needs to be thought of as such.
See what I meant about politicians not liking it?
Economists will tell you that immigrants raise wages for the average native-born worker. They’ll tell you that they make things cheaper for us to buy here, and that if we didn’t have immigrants for some of these jobs, the jobs would move to other countries. They’ll tell you that we should allow for much more highly skilled immigration, because that’s about as close to a free lunch as you’re likely to find. They’ll tell you that the people who should most want a path to legal status for undocumented immigrants are the low-income workers who are most opposed to such plans. And about all this, the economists are right.
There are also noneconomic considerations, of course. Integrating cultures and nationalities is difficult. Undocumented immigrants raise issues of law and fairness. Border security is important. Those questions are important. They’re just not the subject of this column.
The mistake we make when thinking about the effect immigrants have on our wages, says Giovanni Peri, an economist at the University of California at Davis who has studied the issue extensively, is we imagine an economy where the number of jobs is fixed. Then, if one immigrant comes in, he takes one of those jobs or forces a worker to accept a lower wage. But that’s not how our economy works. With more labor—particularly more labor of different kinds—the economy grows larger. It produces more stuff. There are more workers buying things and that increases the total number of jobs. We understand perfectly well that Europe is in trouble because its low birth rates mean fewer workers and that means less economic growth. We ourselves worry that we’re not graduating enough scientists and engineers. But the economy doesn’t care if it gets workers through birth rates or green cards.
In fact, there’s a sense in which green cards are superior. Economists separate new workers into two categories: Those who "substitute" for existing labor—we’re both construction workers, and the boss can easily swap you out for me; and those who "complement" existing labor—you’re a construction engineer and I’m a construction worker. Immigrants, more so than U.S.-born workers, tend to be in the second category, as the jobs you want to give to someone who doesn’t speak English very well and doesn’t have many skills are different from the jobs you give to people who are fluent and have more skills.
But that’s only half of their benefit. "Living standards are a function of two things," says Michael Greenstone, director of the Hamilton Project, which is hosting a Washington conference on the economics of immigration next week. "They’re a function of our wages and the prices of the goods we purchase. " And immigrants reduce the prices of those goods. Patricia Cortes, an economist at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, found that immigrants lowered the prices in "immigrant-intensive industries" like housekeeping and gardening by about 10 percent. So our wages go up and the prices of the things we want to buy go down.
We should remember, though, that the average worker isn’t every worker. A study by Harvard economists George Borjas and Lawrence Katz found that although immigrants raised native wages overall, they slightly hurt the 8 percent of workers without a high-school education and those with a college education. A subsequent study by Peri looked harder at the ways immigrant labor differed from native labor and found that all groups of workers saw a benefit from immigrants—though unskilled workers saw less of a benefit than highly skilled workers.
And unskilled workers face even tougher competition from undocumented immigrants who, because their status is so tenuous, will accept pay beneath the minimum wage. And they are unlikely to complain about safety regulations or work conditions. That takes unskilled immigrants from being a bit cheaper than unskilled natives and makes them a lot cheaper—which makes employers likelier to hire them for jobs that native workers could do better.
This suggests, first, that American workers would be better off if we figured out a way to take the 12 million undocumented immigrants and give them legal status, and second, that we might want to give them more direct help if we’re going to increase immigration. Both are possible—just politically difficult.
Our immigration policy should be primarily oriented around our national goals. And one goal is to have the world’s most innovative and dynamic economy. It’s never going to be the case that each and every one of the planet’s most talented individuals is born on American soil. But those born elsewhere could be lured here. People like living here. We should be leveraging that advantage, mercilessly roaming the globe, finding the most talented people and attracting them to our country. When we have the best talent, we have the best innovations. That’s how we landed Google, Intel, and the atomic bomb. Immigrants are about twice as likely as native-born Americans to start a small business, and they’re 30 percent more likely to apply for a patent.
Which of the following is NOT the benefit of immigration?
选项
A、Immigration will help the economy grow and increase the total number of jobs.
B、Immigration will increase the wages and decrease the prices of goods.
C、Immigration will make skilled native workers face even tougher competition.
D、Immigration will attract the most talented people to the country.
答案
C
解析
首先,要看清题目,找出不正确的选项。所给的三个选项A、B和D分别可从第五段、第七段和第十一段中得出均为正确的答案,而选项C与原文第九段内容不符。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/XGiO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Ascollegeseniorshurtleintothejobhunt,littlefibsontheresume--forexample,claimingsdegreewhenthey’rethreecredit
LanguageFamiliesAllofthelanguageswithinalanguagefamilyare【1】andallofthemhaveasimilarhistory.Let’stakeabr
LanguageFamiliesAllofthelanguageswithinalanguagefamilyare【1】andallofthemhaveasimilarhistory.Let’stakeabr
IsmailKadare,whowasrewardedtheManBooker【M1】______internationalprizeforliteraturethisyear,isthefirst
______wasNOTwrittenbyHemingway.
TheFutureofPCMarketThefirstDevelopersConferenceinChinamarksamajormilestoneforMicrosoft,becausethesuccesso
WhichofthefollowingsportswasNOTinventedinBritain?
InBritain,academicallytalentedpupilsnormallygotoforsecondaryeducation.
ThescientificnameistheHoloceneAge,butclimatologistsliketocallourcurrentclimaticphasetheLongSummer.Thehistory
Backin2000,inspiredbyadesiretohelpthoseinneed,MeganandDennisDoyleofMinneapolisdecidedtheywantedtodomoret
随机试题
患者饱餐后出现胃脘胀痛,拒按,嗳腐吞酸,大便不爽臭秽,舌苔厚腻,脉弦滑。治疗应首选
根据《中华人民共和国反垄断法》,下列行为中,属于垄断行为的有()。
采购数量或金额越高,采购对于成本底线的财务影响就越小。
由垃圾渗出物所导致的污染问题,在那些人均产值为每年4000至5000美元之间的国家最严重,相对贫穷或富裕的国家倒没有那么严重。工业发展在起步阶段,其污染问题都比较严重,当工业发展能创造出足够多的手段来处理这类问题时,污染问题就会减少。目前X国的人均产值是每
风是地球上的一种自然现象,它是由太阳辐射热引起的。太阳照射到地球表面,地球表面各处受热不同,产生温差,从而引起大气的对流运动形成风。而我们在生活中所说的“风挺大的”、“没什么风”,谈论的是风速。风速是指空气在单位时间内流动的水平距离。根
提高教师应聘标准并不是引起目前中小学师资短缺的主要原因。引起中小学师资短缺的主要原因,是近年来中小学教学条件的改进缓慢,以及教师的工资增长未能与其他行业同步。以下哪项如果为真,最能加强上述断定?()
我们对待吸毒,应该像对待言论和宗教信仰一样,将其视为人的一种基本权利。吸毒是个人的自愿行为,没有人非得去吸毒,就如同没有人非得去读某本书一样。如果政府打算限制甚至禁止毒品消费,它只能对其公民强行压服——其方法类似于保护儿童免遭引诱,或限制奴隶对自己的生命实
李娜说,作为一个科学家,她知道没有一个科学家喜欢朦胧诗,而绝大多数科学家都擅长逻辑思维。因此,至少有些喜欢朦胧诗的人不擅长逻辑思维。以下哪项是对李娜的推理的最恰当评价?()
结合材料回答问题:材料1毛泽东在纪念五四运动胜利二十年周年时对青年的讲话(1939.5.1)二十年前的五四运动.表现中国反帝反封建的资产阶级民主革命已经发展到了一个新阶段。五四运动成为文化革新运动.不过是中国反帝反封建的资产阶级民主革
(2011年上半年)Web服务(WlebService)的主要目标是跨平台的操作性,它有许多适用场合。但某些情况下,Wleb服务也会降低应用程序的性能。下列情况中,(28)不适合采用Web服务作为主要的系统集成技术。
最新回复
(
0
)