首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he and his late collaborator, Amos Tversky, are often c
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he and his late collaborator, Amos Tversky, are often c
admin
2013-08-05
82
问题
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he and his late collaborator, Amos Tversky, are often credited with showing that humans make "irrational" choices. That term is too strong, he says, to describe the variety of mental mishaps to which people systematically fall prey. Readers of his book may disagree. Mr. Kahneman, an Israeli-American psychologist and Nobel economics laureate, has delivered a full catalogue of the biases, shortcuts and cognitive illusions to which our species regularly succumbs. In doing so he makes it plain that Homo economicus the rational model of human behaviour beloved of economists—is as fantastical as a unicorn.
In one experiment described by Mr. Kahneman, participants asked to imagine that they have been given £50 behave differently depending on whether they are then told they can "keep" £20 or must "lose" £30--though the outcomes are identical. He also shows that it is more threatening to say that a disease kills "1,286 in every 10,000 people", than to say it kills "24. 14% of the population", even though the second mention is twice as deadly. Vivid language often overrides basic arithmetic.
Some findings are downright peculiar. Experimental subjects who have been "primed" to think of money, perhaps by seeing a picture of dollar bills, will act more selfishly. So if someone nearby drops some pencils, these subjects will pick up fewer than their non-primed counterparts. Even obliquely suggesting the concept of old age will inspire people to walk more slowly—though feeling elderly never crossed their mind, they will later report.
After all this the human brain looks less like a model of rationality and more like a giddy teenager; flighty, easily distracted and lacking in self-awareness. Yet this book is not a counsel of despair. Its awkward title refers to Mr. Kahneman’s two-tier model of cognition: "System 1" is quick, intuitive and responsible for the quirks and mistakes described above(and many others). "System 2", by contrast, is slow, deliberative and less prone to error. System 2 kicks in when we are faced with particularly complex problems, but much of the time it is all too happy to let the impulsive System 1 get its way.
What, then, is System 1 good for? Rather a lot, it turns out. In a world that often demands swift judgment and rapid decision-making, a creature who solely relied on deliberative thinking wouldn’t last long. Moreover, System 1 generally works well. As Mr. Kahneman says, "most of our judgments and actions are appropriate most of the time". He urges readers to counteract what he considers to be mistakes of System 1 thinking, such as the "loss aversion" that deters people from accepting favourable gambles(such as a 50-50 chance to win $200 or lose $100). He also recommends checking the performance of an investment portfolio no more than once a quarter, to limit needless anguish over short-term fluctuations and the "useless churning" of shares.
Mr. Kahneman does not dwell on the possible evolutionary origins of our cognitive biases, nor does he devote much time to considering why some people seem naturally better at avoiding error than others.
Still this book, his first for a non-specialist audience, is a profound one. As Copernicus removed the Earth from the centre of the universe and Darwin knocked humans off their biological perch, Mr. Kahneman has shown that we are not the paragons of reason we assume ourselves to be. Often hailed as the father of behavioural economics(with Tversky as co-parent), his work has influenced a range of disciplines and has even inspired some policy.
But the true consequences of his findings are only starting to emerge. When he presents the poor victims of his experiments with conclusive proof of their errors, the typical reaction is not a chastened pledge to shape up, but confused silence, followed by business as usual. No one likes to be told he is wrong.
Which of the following statements is TRUE of the human brain?
选项
A、In most cases, System 1 is working.
B、System 2 works to lead to mistakes.
C、System 2 is preferred by rational people.
D、System 2 is more complex than System 1.
答案
A
解析
细节题。由选项中的System 1和System 2定位至第四段。末句指出“System 2 kicks…to let the impulsive System 1 get its way.”,这说明更多的时候,是让受直觉影响的系统一来替我们作决定,[A]符合文意,故为答案。由第四段第三句可知,导致错误的是系统一,非系统二,排除[B];由第四句可知,文章并未说理性之人喜欢系统二,[C]为过度推断,排除;第四段末句只是说系统二更适用于处理复杂问题。该段分别介绍了系统一、系统二的特点,在第五段还具体分析了系统一的优点,并未比较两个系统哪个更复杂,[D]无依据,排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Xa4O777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Ihavenostatisticsonthis,butconversationwithfriendsanddozensofperson-on-the-streetinterviewsIsawandheardlastmo
ThegreatdividinglinebetweenthenineteenthcenturyandthecontemporaryAmericanLiteratureis______.
Whichofthefollowingstatementsistrue?
SteveandYaserfirstmetintheirchemistryclassofanAmericanuniversity.YaserwasaninternationalstudentfromJordan.He
TheEconomicSituationofJapaninthe18thCenturyIntheeighteenthcentury,Japan’sfeudaloverlords,fromtheshogunto
Generallyspeaking,theeasternAmericancitiesare(more)______thanthewesternones.
Accordingtothenews,ChechnyahasallofthefollowinggeographicfeaturesEXCEPT______.
Researchersinmanycountrieshaveobservedthatmiddleclasschildrenasagrouparemoresuccessfulintheeducationalsystem
Before1973,abortionwasillegalinAmericaunlessthewoman’shealthwasthreatened.InMarchof1970,JaneRoe,asinglewom
Unlikeanearthquake,ademographicdisasterdoesnotstrikewithoutwarning.Japan’spopulationof127mispredictedtofallto
随机试题
一般不引起慢性肝炎的病毒是
A.真武汤B.厚朴温中汤C.理中丸D.小青龙汤E.半夏泻心汤
薄荷、牛蒡子除均可疏散风热外,还具有的功效是
甲苯法测定水分适合于
外毒素的本质是脂多糖。()
监理工程师在审批工程延期时应遵循的原则是()。
【2015.辽宁特岗】道德情感
材料:党的十九大报告提出:“打造共建共治共享的社会治理格局。加强社会治理制度建设,完善党委领导、政府负责、社会协同、公众参与、法治保障的社会治理体制,提高社会治理社会化、法治化、智能化、专业化水平。” 要求:1.根据十九大报告精神,谈谈社会治理为什
焦点小组(浙江师大2012年研)
PeopleintheUSAeatalotoffriedchicken.______.
最新回复
(
0
)