首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
职业资格
The medical community owes economists a great deal. Amartya Sen won a Nobel Prize for Economic Sciences in 1998. He has spent hi
The medical community owes economists a great deal. Amartya Sen won a Nobel Prize for Economic Sciences in 1998. He has spent hi
admin
2015-03-27
88
问题
The medical community owes economists a great deal. Amartya Sen won a Nobel Prize for Economic Sciences in 1998. He has spent his entire career promulgating ideas of justice and freedom, with health rarely out of his gaze. Joseph Stiglitz won a Noble in 2001. In 1998, when he was chief economist at the (then) notoriously regressive World Bank, he famously challenged the Washington Consensus. And Jeff Sachs, a controversial figure to some critics, can fairly lay claim to the enormous achievement of putting health at the center of the Millennium Development Goals. His "Commission on Macroeconomics and Health" was a landmark report, providing explicit evidence to explain why attacking disease was absolutely necessary if poverty was to be eradicated. And I must offer my own personal gratitude to a very special group of economists—Larry Summers, Dean Jamison, Kenneth Arrow, David Evans, and Sanjeev Gupta. They were the economic team that drove the work of Global Health 2035.
But although we might be kind to economists, perhaps we should be tougher on the discipline of economics itself. For economics has much to answer for. Pick up any economics textbook, and you will see the priority given to markets and efficiency, price and utility, profit and competition. These words have chilling effects on our quest for better health. They seem to marginalize those qualities of our lives that we value most of all—not our self-interest, but our humanity; not the costs and benefits of monetary exchange, but vision and ideals that guide our decisions. It was these issues that were addressed at last week’s Global Health Lab, held at London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
Anne Mills, Vice-Director of the School, fervently argued the case in favor of economists. It was they who contributed to understanding the idea of "best-buys" in global health. It was economists who challenged user fees. And it was economists who made the connection between health and economic growth, providing one of the most compelling political arguments for taking health seriously. Some economists might adore markets, but not health economists, she said. "Health care is different." For her kind of economist, a health system is a "social institution that embodies the values of society".
Although competition has a part to play in health, it should be used judiciously as a mechanism to improve the quality of care. Chris Whitty, Chief Scientific Adviser at the UK’s Department for International Development, expressed his contempt for those who profess indifference to economics. Economics is about the efficient allocation of scarce resources. Anyone who backed the inefficient allocation of resources is "immoral". He did criticize economists for their arrogance, though. Economists seemed to believe their ideas should be accepted simply because of the authority they held as economists. Economics, he said, is only one science among many that policy makers have to take into account. But Clare Chandler, a medical anthropologist, took a different view. She asked, what has neoliberal economics ever done for global health? Her answer, in one word, was "inequality". Neoliberal economics frames the way we think and act. Her argument suggested that any economic philosophy that put a premium on free trade, privatization, minimal government, and reduced public spending on social and health sectors is a philosophy bereft of human virtue. The discussion that followed, led by Martin McKee, posed difficult questions. Why do economists pay such little attention to inequality? Why do economists treat their theories like religions? Why are economists so silent on their own failures? Can economics ever be apolitical? There were few satisfactory answers to these questions.
What does the author intend to tell the reader?
选项
A、There is still a long way to go for economists to genuinely contribute to global health.
B、Economists’ role in global health is, to a large extent, negative.
C、Economists increased the inequality of resource allocations in global health.
D、Economics is only one science among many that policy makers have to take into account in providing health care programs.
答案
A
解析
根据文章最后一段最后一句“There were few satisfactory answers to these questions.”可知A项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/XrCv777K
本试题收录于:
英语学科知识与教学能力题库教师资格分类
0
英语学科知识与教学能力
教师资格
相关试题推荐
阅读下面材料,回答问题。材料一李鸿章说:“各口岸生意,已被洋人占尽,华商领管船另树一帜,洋人势力挟重资以倾夺,则需华商自立公司,收回洋人夺去之利。”这表明李鸿章主张兴办民用企业的最主要意图是与外国资本主义争夺市场。材料二根据上述材料,编制一道
Ifateacherstartswithlanguageexamplesandguidesstudentstoworkouttherules,he/sheisusingthe______method.
WhichofthefollowingshouldateacheravoidwhenusinganELTcoursebook?
Themedicalcommunityoweseconomistsagreatdeal.AmartyaSenwonaNobelPrizeforEconomicSciencesin1998.Hehasspenthi
Africanelephantshavebeenslaughteredatalarmingrateoverthepastdecade,largelybecausetheyaretheprimarysourceofth
TheBritishMedicalJournalrecentlyfeaturedastrongresponsetowhatwasjudgedaninappropriatelylenientreactionbyamedi
Donna’sfourthgradeclassroomlookedtypicallytraditional.YetsomethingseemeddifferentthatdaywhenIentereditforthef
Therelationshipbetweenformaleducationandeconomicgrowthinpoorcountriesiswidelymisunderstoodbyeconomistsandpoliti
ForgetCyclists,PedestriansareRealDangerWearehavingadebateaboutthistopic.Herearesomelettersfromourreaders.-
随机试题
代码编写阶段可进行的软件测试是
不符合“人人享有卫生保健”内涵的是()
A.病变转移到肝脏B.病变转移至阴道C.肺内转移病灶总面积大于一侧肺的1/2D.病变转移至宫旁组织及附件E.病变局限于子宫关于绒毛膜癌及侵蚀性葡萄胎临床分期,Ⅰ期
在填土路基时,到填土()时,应按设计断面、高程控制填土厚度,并及时碾压修整。
某企业用银行存款5万元偿还以前欠其他单位的货款4万元和1个月前从银行取得的借款1万元。在借贷记账法下,这笔经济业务涉及()等账户。
了解机器设备现时的完整性、外观和内部结构情况等,属于机器设备的()。
下列属于研究业务控制的主要内容的是()。
注册会计师对被审计单位实施销货业务的截止测试,其主要目的是为了检查( )。
在产品成本计算的基础上,按物流领域、物流功能分别设置二级、三级明细账的物流成本核算方法,属于独立的物流成本核算体系。()
把154本书分给某班的同学,如果不管怎样分,都至少有一位同学会分得4本或4本以上的书,那么这个班最多有多少名学生?()
最新回复
(
0
)