首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’s (1994) qualitative study of working people’s diaries, we assigne
Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’s (1994) qualitative study of working people’s diaries, we assigne
admin
2013-01-15
65
问题
Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’s (1994) qualitative study of working people’s diaries, we assigned each diarist a set of codes to indicate employment, marital status, number of children, and size of the town in which he or she lived. To analyze the number, location and gender mix of visiting occasions, we coded each day in January and July for every year of the diary, counting the number of named visitors, the visitors’ gender, the size of the visiting occasion (1 to 4 people, or 5 and above), the gender mix of those present during the visit, and the location of the visit. While this may seem straightforward at first glance, the variable nature of the diary entries meant that the coding process was not as uncomplicated as we initially anticipated.
Given the number of diarists and the span of diary-keeping years, we faced the possibility of coding over 200,000 diary days. Because of the labor-intensive nature of the coding and the number of entries, we chose to code only 2 months——January and July——of each year a diarist kept a diary. We chose 2 months that could reflect a range of sociability. Severe January weather in New England impeded mobility, but it also freed those who were farmers from most of their labor——intensive chores. July tended to be haying season for farmers, which meant some people routinely worked all month in the fields——some alone, some with hired help. Further, the clement July weather meant grater mobility for all of the diary keepers. For some people——those who kept a diary for only a single year——the fact that we coded only 2 months out of each year meant we have only 62 "diary-days" to document their social lives. For others, we have several thousand. Limiting ourselves to January and July for each diary year, we nonetheless coded entries for a total of 24,752 diary days. In an effort to capture an accurate picture of visiting patterns, we coded every day of a given month, even those that had no entry or that mentioned only the weather, as well as those that recorded numerous visiting occasions in one day.
Determining a working definition of what constituted a visit was also an unexpected challenge. For example, although schoolteacher Mary Mudge kept a meticulous record of her visiting "rounds," listing names, places, and conversation topics, other diarists were not as forthcoming. A typical entry in farmer John Campbell’s diary (9 July, 1825) was less amenable to our initial coding scheme: "Go to Cart’s for Oxen." (See Hansen and Mcdonald, 1995, for a fuller discussion of the pitfalls of coding diary data.) We therefore created the following coding protocol.
We defined a visit as any occasion in which the diarist names the presence of individuals not of his or her household, the presence of the non-household member serving to distinguish between a community interaction and a household interaction. We also coded as visits public events at which the diarist was present but others in attendance were not named. The most common among these were records of church attendance. Although an entry "went to church" did not result in a finding of specific male or female visitors, it was a community interaction; thus, these entries were coded as gender-mixed visiting occasions of five or more people in a public place. Because of the variable nature of diary-keeping practices, we were careful to record only what we could confidently infer. Therefore, some entries record visits but no named individuals. Others, such as church attendance (which is generally a large-group event) or a visit to one named friend (which is an intimate affair), allowed ns to code the size of the group. Still others, when the location of the visit was specifically mentioned, allowed us to code the diarist as hosting, acting as a guest in another’s home, or interaction at a public place.
What was coded?
选项
A、Writings about everyday life
B、A distinctive study
C、The months of January and July
D、The visitors the writers had
答案
A
解析
文章说的是记录日记,也就是每天的生活。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Xs2O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Themagnitudeoftheproblemofdisappearingspecies,viewedworldwide,dwarfsresourcescurrentlyavailabletoaddressit.Byt
Althoughdiverse,Africanmusichascertaindistinctivetraits,oneofwhichistheuseofrepetitionasanorganizingprinciple
IntheUS,psychologistsatanumberofuniversitiesaremakingaseriousstudyofhowrumorsareborn,howthey______andhow
Writeanessayofatleast250wordsbasedonthefollowingtopic.Yourwritingshouldincludeyourviewandsupportingdetails.
Perhapsthemostinterestingthingaboutthephenomenonoftaboobehaviorishowitcanchange【1】theyearswithinthesamesocie
Duringthepastgeneration,theAmericanmiddle-classfamilythatoncecouldcountonhardworkandfairplaytokeepitselffin
Toourdelight,shequickly______herselftothenewsituation.
Thestudyofsocialscienceismorethanthestudyoftheindividualsocialsciences.Althoughitistreethattobeagoodsoci
Spaceisadangerousplace,notonlybecauseofmeteorsbutalsobecauseofraysfromthesunandotherstars.Radiationist
Theracialtheoryofcivilizationhasceasedtobescientificallyrespectable.Todayweonlyknowitasasophisticalexcusefor
随机试题
疲劳实验时,要求式样不得少于_____。
Intoday’scompetitivejobmarket,studentsarelookingfordegreesoutsidetheirhomecountriestopositionthemselvesasgloba
应急电源与正常电源之间,必须采取防止()运行的措施。
有关部门在对建筑企业履行安全监督检查职责时,有权采取的措施有()。
材料预算价格包括()。
操作系统是对()进行管理的系统软件。
综合报告是各报告单位针对管理范围内、报告期内各类风险与内控状况撰写的综合性风险报告。综合报告应反映的主要内容包括()。
甲厂向乙厂发出信函,表示愿以1万元出让设备一台。乙厂回复:需该设备,但价格应为8000元;甲厂又回函:价格可为9000元,复函即供货。乙厂经办人因工作不负责任,接甲厂的复函后,未予处理。后甲厂将设备发送到乙厂,乙厂才发现对甲厂原函未处理,该案例中,乙厂不接
小李养了一群猴子,每只猴子每天早上要吃3个桃子,晚上吃4个桃子。有一次他买了若干个桃子,发现如果这些桃子供猴子吃6个早上、5个晚上,则会多余7个桃子;但如果要供猴子们吃5个早上、6个晚上,则还差8个桃子。那么小李买了多少个桃子?
•Youwillheartheorganiserofanannualconferenceattendedbythesalesrepresentativesofalargecompany.Heistellingth
最新回复
(
0
)