首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B,
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B,
admin
2017-09-22
29
问题
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25.
For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B, C or D.
Are You Afraid of MOOCs?
Are MOOCs and other online materials a threat to quality public higher education, and to our role as professors? The members of the philosophy department at San Jose State University think so. They recently issued an open letter to Michael Sandel, a professor of Harvard University, objecting to his role in encouraging the use of MOOCs at public universities. The controversy stems from San Jose State’s contract with edX, a company that provides MOOCs, including one based on Sandel’s course on justice at Harvard. San Jose State has agreed to use materials provided by edX, but the philosophy department has refused to use Sandel’s online lectures in its courses. Though MOOCs are still new, many of the arguments presented by the San Jose State philosophy professors do not ring true in light of my experience.
We should begin by distinguishing two issues. The philosophy professors state that they have felt pressured by their administration to use the materials from Sandel’s course. The administration denies exerting any such pressure. Whatever the truth of the matter, that is an issue of academic freedom, and not about the pedagogical merits of using MOOCs and other online materials. I certainly agree that professors should be, responsible for the content and pedagogy in their own courses.
The real issue, then, is whether the availability and use of online materials, whether through MOOCs or through other channels, is a threat to quality education, especially at public universities. Many of the arguments presented in the letter presuppose an either/or, all-or-nothing approach when it comes to face-to-face versus online teaching. But the whole point of a hybrid, or blended, course is that it combines both. And it is difficult to see why it makes a great deal of difference whether the online content is delivered via a MOOC or not.
Nothing will ever replace the face-to-face discussions that occur in the classroom. But in many traditional, on-campus courses, little discussion occurs. In a lecture course with hundreds, or even just scores, of students, much of the time in the classroom is inevitably spent with the professor lecturing and the students(hopefully)taking notes-or at least listening attentively. In courses with a significant lecture component, the advantages of using online lectures are undeniable. I know from my own experience that, if my attention wanes for a few moments, it is very convenient to simply go back and play a portion again. One can do the same if one doesn’t quite understand something the first time. And one need not miss material to take a bathroom break.
The availability of high-quality online lectures is an opportunity to rethink how we spend our time in the classroom. If an online lecture presents the material, or walks students through an argument, we are freed to spend more time discussing the aspects of the material that are most difficult-or most interesting. We can do other kinds of activities that we might not have time for if we felt obliged to present the material in the traditional way. Yes, hybrid courses usually involve less face-to-face time, but that time can be better and more effectively spent.
The crucial thing is that
the instructor remains in the driver’s seat
-and that takes us back to academic freedom. As long as individual professors are choosing what material to assign or recommend, running their in-class discussions and adding material that they think is not adequately covered in the online lectures, choosing the assignments and tests, and grading those tests, there is no threat to the professoriate, or to the quality of education at universities, public or otherwise.
The primary purpose of the passage is to______.
选项
A、encourage the utilization of MOOCs
B、emphasize the importance of MOOCs
C、criticize MOOCs for its inconvenience
D、expose the unreliability of MOOCs
答案
A
解析
综观全文,可知本文的主要目的是鼓励使用大规模网络在线公开课程,而并非强调大规模网络在线公开课程的重要性,或批评其不便性、不可靠性,因此应选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Y59d777K
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
ReadthisletterfromMs.Lee.KEGAUDIOMAIDSTONKENTME156QPTel:(01622)672261Fax:(01622)750653Mr.YoshiWatenable2-9-9S
Readthefollowingjobadvertisementintoday’sDailyTelegraph,YouareAnnJonesandwritealetterabout120wordsofapplica
HereisaletterfromColoradoStateUniversitytoinformtheapplicantMr.LithathehasbeenadmittedtoCognitivePsychology
HereisaletterwhichcomplainsaboutthequalityoftheTVsetboughtinastore.Readtheletterandcompletethegiveninfor
HereisanadvertisementaboutaBusinessBookClub.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethegiveninformationform.Wri
HereisanadvertisementaboutaBusinessBookClub.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethegiveninformationform.Wri
HereisanadvertisementaboutforacertainpositioninthenewspaperofDec.7,2005.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethe
HereisanadvertisementaboutforacertainpositioninthenewspaperofDec.7,2005.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethe
随机试题
下列陈子龙《小车行》诗句中,属于饥民猜想之词的是()
1995年11月,上任才一年的甬江市开关厂董厂长,就开始运筹第二年的工厂大计。这时,从经营计划部门传来了一则令人又喜又忧的消息:喜的是花了整整一年时间,投入25万元试制费用的HR3刀熔开关新产品,通过鉴定并领取了生产许可证,产品投入市场,销势甚旺,预测19
瓜蒌的性状特征有( )。
回归分析法的应用前提,是各自变量与因变量之间存在显著的()关系。
当事人对仲裁协议的效力有异议,一方请求仲裁委员会作出决定,另一方请求人民法院作出裁定的,由()裁定。
根据专利法律制度的规定,下列各项中,不能授予专利权的有()。(2010年试题)
从所给四个选项中,选择最合适的填入1和2处,使之呈现一定的规律性:
Ihavemadea(n)______foryoutoseethedoctorat8o’clocktomorrow.
简述洛克白板说。
Inthispart,youareaskedtowriteacompositiononthetitleof"EffectofResearchEventonMyLaterLifeandWork"withno
最新回复
(
0
)