首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B,
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B,
admin
2017-09-22
23
问题
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25.
For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B, C or D.
Are You Afraid of MOOCs?
Are MOOCs and other online materials a threat to quality public higher education, and to our role as professors? The members of the philosophy department at San Jose State University think so. They recently issued an open letter to Michael Sandel, a professor of Harvard University, objecting to his role in encouraging the use of MOOCs at public universities. The controversy stems from San Jose State’s contract with edX, a company that provides MOOCs, including one based on Sandel’s course on justice at Harvard. San Jose State has agreed to use materials provided by edX, but the philosophy department has refused to use Sandel’s online lectures in its courses. Though MOOCs are still new, many of the arguments presented by the San Jose State philosophy professors do not ring true in light of my experience.
We should begin by distinguishing two issues. The philosophy professors state that they have felt pressured by their administration to use the materials from Sandel’s course. The administration denies exerting any such pressure. Whatever the truth of the matter, that is an issue of academic freedom, and not about the pedagogical merits of using MOOCs and other online materials. I certainly agree that professors should be, responsible for the content and pedagogy in their own courses.
The real issue, then, is whether the availability and use of online materials, whether through MOOCs or through other channels, is a threat to quality education, especially at public universities. Many of the arguments presented in the letter presuppose an either/or, all-or-nothing approach when it comes to face-to-face versus online teaching. But the whole point of a hybrid, or blended, course is that it combines both. And it is difficult to see why it makes a great deal of difference whether the online content is delivered via a MOOC or not.
Nothing will ever replace the face-to-face discussions that occur in the classroom. But in many traditional, on-campus courses, little discussion occurs. In a lecture course with hundreds, or even just scores, of students, much of the time in the classroom is inevitably spent with the professor lecturing and the students(hopefully)taking notes-or at least listening attentively. In courses with a significant lecture component, the advantages of using online lectures are undeniable. I know from my own experience that, if my attention wanes for a few moments, it is very convenient to simply go back and play a portion again. One can do the same if one doesn’t quite understand something the first time. And one need not miss material to take a bathroom break.
The availability of high-quality online lectures is an opportunity to rethink how we spend our time in the classroom. If an online lecture presents the material, or walks students through an argument, we are freed to spend more time discussing the aspects of the material that are most difficult-or most interesting. We can do other kinds of activities that we might not have time for if we felt obliged to present the material in the traditional way. Yes, hybrid courses usually involve less face-to-face time, but that time can be better and more effectively spent.
The crucial thing is that
the instructor remains in the driver’s seat
-and that takes us back to academic freedom. As long as individual professors are choosing what material to assign or recommend, running their in-class discussions and adding material that they think is not adequately covered in the online lectures, choosing the assignments and tests, and grading those tests, there is no threat to the professoriate, or to the quality of education at universities, public or otherwise.
The primary purpose of the passage is to______.
选项
A、encourage the utilization of MOOCs
B、emphasize the importance of MOOCs
C、criticize MOOCs for its inconvenience
D、expose the unreliability of MOOCs
答案
A
解析
综观全文,可知本文的主要目的是鼓励使用大规模网络在线公开课程,而并非强调大规模网络在线公开课程的重要性,或批评其不便性、不可靠性,因此应选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Y59d777K
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
Readthefollowingstatement:Onlyunderofficiallawsoradministrativeregulationscanwedefendastableandreliableexa
Lookatthefollowingadvertisement.ChinaDailyWewouldliketohearyouropinionsaboutthei
Youareaskedtowriteacompositioninwhichyougiveyourownopinionsonthefollowingstatement:Trafficandhousingpro
HereisaletterfromColoradoStateUniversitytoinformtheapplicantMr.LithathehasbeenadmittedtoCognitivePsychology
YougotaletterfromJimGreen,apersonworkingatthemarketingdepartmentofacompany.
HereisaletterwhichcomplainsaboutthequalityoftheTVsetboughtinastore.Readtheletterandcompletethegiveninfor
Youareaskedtowriteacompositioninwhichyougiveyourownopinionsonthefollowingstatement:Face-to-facecomm
HereisanadvertisementaboutforacertainpositioninthenewspaperofDec.7,2005.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethe
HereisanadvertisementaboutforacertainpositioninthenewspaperofDec.7,2005.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethe
Readthefollowingletterandcompletethegiveninformationform.Writeaword,phraseornumberinthespaces1-5.De
随机试题
求函数f(χ)=cos2χ+sinχ(0≤χ≤π)的极值。
病人侧卧位时,腰穿脑脊液的压力超过多少提示颅内压增高
A.久益气利水B.温阳利水C.滋阴利水D.行气利水E.清热利水猪苓汤的功用是
心室收缩时颈静脉有搏动,可见于()
A.氧化反应B.重排反应C.卤代反应D.甲基化反应E.乙基化反应第Ⅰ相生物转化代谢中发生的反应是()。
法与共产党的政策在表现形式上不同,表现在()
请根据自已的经验,谈谈教学前反思、教学中反思和教学后反思各需要反思些什么。
违法行为在一年内没有被发现的,不再给予行政处罚。()
下列属于南京国民政府司法院及其大法官会议享有的职权是()。
江泽民指出:只要我们党始终成为中国先进生产力的发展要求、中国先进文化的前进方向、中国最广大人民的根本利益的忠实代表,我党就能永远立于不败之地,永远得到全国各族人民的衷心拥护并带领人民不断前进。“三个代表”重要思想的正式提出是在()。
最新回复
(
0
)