首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Startup Nuclear Energy Companies Augur Safer, Cheaper Atomic Power A)Nothing captures how fashionable the startup has become qui
Startup Nuclear Energy Companies Augur Safer, Cheaper Atomic Power A)Nothing captures how fashionable the startup has become qui
admin
2020-06-08
37
问题
Startup Nuclear Energy Companies Augur Safer, Cheaper Atomic Power
A)Nothing captures how fashionable the startup has become quite like crowdfunding. The craze for raising contributions via websites like Kickstarter and Indiegogo is helping to launch companies from scooter manufacturers to lightbulb vendors to filmmakers. Now, even nuclear fusion is game.
B)Yes, the Holy Grail of cheap, clean, safe, plentiful, low-carbon energy that has remained 40 years in the future since scientists proposed it over half a century ago has entered the crowd sourcing era. International government projects like ITER in France and the National Ignition Facility in California may have spent billions of dollars in pursuit of the technology, but that doesn’t mean there can’t be a little grassroots action, too.
C)LPP Fusion, a tiny company based in Middlesex, N.J., launched in May an Indiegogo campaign to raise $200,000—loose change in this business—that it believes will help it reach a major fusion development milestone in a year and commercialize fusion reactors by 2020.
D)LPP(it stands for "Lawrenceville Plasma Physics")is representative of a new class of companies emerging to address the world’s energy crisis: Nuclear startups. Dozens of small new reactor companies are either chasing the elusive fusion dream or pursuing fission designs that trump those on the market today. All are promising to deliver a knock-out blow to the carbon-intensive fossil fuels that bedevil the world with environmental impact and volatile geopolitics and economics. Many of these innovative firms are positioning their reactors not just for electricity, but also to provide clean heat for high temperature industrial processes and for water desalination.
E)While LPP might be the only crowdfunded member of the group, it is determined like its young peers to shake up the staid nuclear industry. Reactor designs have not fundamentally changed since utilities first connected fission machines to the grid in the 1950s, marking a conservatism that has mired nuclear in the era of black-and-white television while colourful possibilities abound. The startups aim to brighten the palette.
F)For LPP, that would mean not only delivering fusion—melding atoms together rather than fission’ s waste-creating process of splitting them apart—but it would also eliminate the time-honoured need for costly turbines and generators. Nuclear power, including most fusion concepts, functions mechanically the same way fossil fuel plants do by creating heat to produce steam to drive a turbine. LPP is working on a type of fusion called "aneutronic" that emits charged particles for electricity.
G)"The nuclear industry is stuck using the same method for making electricity that utilities have used since the days of Thomas Edison—generate heat to make steam to drive a turbine and generator," says Eric Lerner, president of LPP Fusion. "We can change all that. We can convert energy directly into electricity and slash costs."
H)First, he’ll need the $200,000 he seeks on Indiegogo(he has until July 5 to raise it), which would buy him some fancy new beryllium electrodes that would withstand rigors far better than the copper variety that LPP has been using. He hopes to install them by the end of this year in his experimental fusion reactor, which Lerner operates at the Friendly Storage premises in Middlesex, a place otherwise full of surplus boxes and furniture.
I)Lerner is boldly confident that the beryllium would by the middle of next year enable his lab to overcome the problem that has vexed fusion projects forever: It would harness more energy out of its reactor than what goes into it. Additional financing might then rush in. LPP will need $50 million in total, virtually nothing next to the nearly $18 billion that ITER has budgeted for only the next 10 years of an expected 30 years of construction and development of a 20-story "tokamak" facility.
J)With the financing, Lerner believes that by 2020 he could license the mass-production of small $300,000-to- $500,000 fusion machines—each the size of a one-car garage—with a capacity of 5 megawatts, enough to power 3,000 houses.
K)If only he had the wherewithal of rival fusion startup Tri-Alpha Energy, which has rounded up over $140 million from Goldman Sachs, Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen, and Russian state-owned company Rusnano, among others. Like LPP, Irvine, Calif.-based Tri-Alpha hopes to develop an aneutronic machine that delivers electricity without using turbines.
L)ITER and NIF, the government groups, are taking a more "conventional" fusion approach, aspiring to drive turbines with heat released by fusing isotopes of hydrogen.(In contrast, an aneutronic process tends to fuse standard hydrogen and boron.)So, too, are a number of startups that believe they can crack fusion long before the big science projects do by developing smaller machines(NIF’ s facility is 3 football fields long and 10 stories tall)and deploying different technologies.
M)"We liken it to the Human Genome Project or SpaceX, where large government programs were ultimately outrun by more nimble and more practical innovation in the private sector," notes Nathan Gilliland, CEO of General Fusion near Vancouver, Canada. General Fusion has raised $32 million from sources including the Canadian oil company Cenovus and Jeff Bezos, Amazon’ s chief executive.
N)As intriguing as fusion is, there is probably more startup activity in fission, where novel approaches promise great improvements over the industry’s addiction to fissioning solid uranium fuel rods then cooling and moderating them with water.
O)A host of startups are experimenting with different approaches including the use of liquid fuel, the use of solid fuel with different shapes(such as bricks or pebbles), and the use of alternative coolants and moderators such as salts and gases. Many of the designs draw on ideas that politics suppressed decades ago. Some, like Bill Gates-chaired TerraPower in Bellevue, Wash., are designing "fast reactors" that don’t moderate neutrons. Some envision using the element thorium instead of uranium.
P)Between them, they portend leaps in safety, cut way down on nuclear waste, use "waste" as fuel, and minimize weapons proliferation risks, slash costs and tremendously boost efficiencies. Many fit the "small modular" forms that enables mass production and affordable incremental power.(Oregon startup NuScale Power recently secured $217 million in federal funds to develop a small but comparatively conventional reactor.)
Q)"There is a growing market pull for innovation in the nuclear space, so you ’re beginning to see a blossoming of startup companies doing different things in nuclear," says Simon Irish, CEO of startup Terrestrial Energy, Mississauga, Canada, which is developing a "molten salt" reactor(MSR)based on liquid fuel. In the U.S., Russ Wilcox, CEO of Cambridge, Mass.-based MSR developer Transatomic Power, implores the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to broaden its focus beyond conventional reactor safety, which he says "freezes progress".
R)Many observers believe that countries other than the U.S., such as Canada and China, will deploy first. Beijing is funding innovative Chinese fission projects, with collaboration from the U.S. DOE. Meanwhile, Western companies seek funds. Like Cenovus at General Fusion, more oil companies might pony up, because they want clean heat to process petroleum. As Fortune reported last month, a lack of industry funding appears to have slowed progress in DOE’ s mission to develop an advanced reactor. LPP Fusion doesn’ t seem to be worried. For the young company, the next financing stage could simply be a matter of warming up the crowd.
All the reactor companies are devoted to figure out the new energy which can replace the carbon-intensive fossil fuels.
选项
答案
D
解析
题干意为所有核能反应堆公司都致力于研究取代化石能源燃料的新能源。根据题干中的 “the carbon-intensive fossil fuels”可定位至D段 “All arepromising to deliver a knock—out blow to the carbon-intensive fossil fuels that bedevil theworld with environmental impact and volatile geopolitics and economics.”.题干是对该句主干部分的同义转述,原文中,“all”代指“All the reactor companies”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Y9P7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、Thebuildingmethodthebuildersusetosaveenergy.B、Thelimitoftheflowofairbetweeninsideandoutside.C、Theuseofm
A、Lentmoremoneytothegovernment.B、Decreaseditsmaininterestrates.C、Gavefavorableloanstoprivatecompanies.D、Decreas
DoBritain’sEnergyFirmsServethePublicInterest?[A]Capitalismisthebestandworstofsystems.Lefttoitself,itwillemb
DoBritain’sEnergyFirmsServethePublicInterest?[A]Capitalismisthebestandworstofsystems.Lefttoitself,itwillemb
A、Theambitiontobecomethegreatestmagician.B、Therealitythathefailedinaswimmingrace.C、ThemagicianHoudiniandhis
A、Risingfuelcoststolimittheuseofit.B、Savingenergyanduseothersources.C、Havingprotectionagainstfuelshortage.D、
A、Noonewantstolookatthecloset.B、Themanhasalreadycleaneditup.C、Ithasgraduallybecomeatrashcan.D、Itisoccupi
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteacompositionentitledDoLibrariesBecomeUselessattheAgeofInformation?
A、Bysendingwaterdirectlybacktoseawithgreatforce.B、Byreducingwaveenergy.C、Byreducingbeachwidth.D、Bystabilizing
随机试题
换热器(列管)管程和壳程物料的选择原则是什么?
国际私法上一般称“合同准据法”,乃指主要适用于()
A.胆总管结石B.壶腹癌C.胰头癌D.胆囊炎E.肝门部肿瘤右上腹绞痛伴黄疸的是
扩张型心肌病与心包积液鉴别,哪一项检查最有帮助
A.氟利昂B.可可豆脂C.羧甲基纤维素钠D.吐温一80E.硬脂酸镁片剂中常作润滑剂的是()。
减少生态环境影响的工程措施有()。
经营成本与总成本费用的大小关系是()。
“Whatareyougoingtodo?”这是一个六年级的教学案例。教师在教学句型“Whatareyougoingtodo?I’mgoingto…”时,由于“五一节”马上来临,教师设置情景,让学生用“I’mgoing
苏州曾经是经济兴盛、文化发达、人才荟萃之地。明末清初以后,苏州士绅除少数人发生身份和观念转化外,多数人的传统观念仍根深蒂固。而作为社会主流的士绅观念和意识往往通过各种渠道浸润展延,严重影响一般民众,正因如此,晚清苏州民风靡弱闲散,生活节奏缓慢,缺乏早期现代
数字遗产,是指被继承人死亡时遗留的个人所有的网络权益和财产,可大致分成精神和物质两个层面,包括被继承人的游戏装备、虚拟货币、账号密码、文件视频等。根据上述定义,下列属于数字遗产的是:
最新回复
(
0
)