首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
In terms of pure quantity of research and debate, business schools have performed amazingly in promoting management as a distinc
In terms of pure quantity of research and debate, business schools have performed amazingly in promoting management as a distinc
admin
2011-12-20
56
问题
In terms of pure quantity of research and debate, business schools have performed amazingly in promoting management as a distinctive activity. No other discipline has produced as much in such a short period. It is unclear yet how much of it will stand the test of time, but for sheer industry, the business school deserve credit. Not a day goes by without another wave of research papers, books, articles, and journals.
In these terms, schools have produced a generally accepted theoretical basis for management. When it comes to knowledge creation, however, they find themselves in difficulties. They are caught between the need for academic rigour and for real-world business relevance, which tend to pull in opposite directions. The desire to establish management as a credible discipline leads to research that panders to traditional academic criteria. The problem for business school researchers is that they seek the approval of their academic peers rather than the business community. In the United States this has led to the sort of grand ’paper clip counting’ exercises that meet demands for academic rigour but fail to add one iota to the real sum of human knowledge.
Business schools have too often allowed the constraints of the academic world to cloud their view of the real world. Business school researchers seek provable theories rather than helpful theories. They have championed a prescriptive approach to management based on analysis and, more recently, on fashionable ideas that soon disappear into the ether. The one best way approach encourages researchers to mould the idiosyncrasies of managerial reality into their tightly defined models of behaviour. Figures and statistics are fitted into linear equations and tidy models. Economists and other social scientists label this cure smoothing. Meanwhile, reality continually refuses to cooperate.
Central to this is the tension between relevance and rigour. In a perfect world, there would be no need to choose between the two. But in the business school world, the need to satisfy academic criteria and be published in journals often tilts the balance away from relevance. In other words, it is often easier to pursue quantifiable objectives than it is to add anything useful to the debate about management. To a large extent, the entire business school system works against useful, knowledge-creating research. Academics have five years in which to prove themselves if they are to make the academic grade. It seems long enough. But it can take two or even three years to get into a suitable journal. They therefore have around three years, probably less, to come up with an area of interest and carry out meaningful and original research. This is a demanding timescale. The temptation must be to slice up old data in new ways rather than pursue genuinely groundbreaking, innovative research.
It is a criticism also made by some business school insiders. "Academic journals tend to find more and more techniques for testing more and more obscure theories. They are asking trivial questions and answering them exactly. There has to be a backlash," says Julian Birkinshaw of London Business School. In large part, the problem goes back to a time when business schools were trying to establish themselves. Up until the 1960s, American business schools were dismissed as pseudo-academic institutions, including the universities of which they often formed a part, regarded them as a little more than vocational colleges. Since then, most of the leading schools have undergone major reassessments and introduced sweeping changes. However, it is questionable whether those changes have gone far enough.
What does the first paragraph suggest about the research generated by business schools?
选项
A、Its quality is variable.
B、Its lasting value is uncertain.
C、It has always been produced too quickly.
D、It has had no influence on management.
答案
B
解析
第一段第三句指出“It is unclear yet how much of it will stand the test of time”,即这些研究成果能否经得起时间考验还不确定,故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/YDua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
thegreatrejuvenationoftheChinesenation
Judicialcommittee
sovereignstates
ScientistsShedNewLightOnTheBody’sRhythmsHaveyoueversufferedfromjet-lag,thefatigueanddepressionthatcomes
Itisaresearchthatisguaranteedtodelightmen—andinfuriatethewomenintheirlives.Acontroversialnewstudyhasclaime
negativeinterestratemortgage
ambassadorextraordinaryandplenipotentiary
中非合作论坛(ForumonChina-AfricaCooperation,简称FOCAC),是中华人民共和国和非洲国家之间在南南合作范畴内的集体对话机制,成立于2000。论坛的宗旨是平等【R21】________、增进了解、扩大【R22】_____
Nationalpovertywas______byrapidpopulationgrowth.
PopstarstodayenjoyastyleoflivingwhichwasoncetheprerogativeonlyofRoyalty.Wherevertheygo,peopleturnoutinthe
随机试题
()是指为了完成特定目标而设置的人的职务及其关系的结构。
TheCognitiveApproachgivesimportancetothelearner’sactivepartintheprocessofusingandlearningalanguage,particula
A.实热积滞,燥屎坚结B.脘腹冷痛,大便秘结C.腹大水肿,二便不通D.津枯血少,肠燥便秘E.虫积腹痛,大便秘结(1995-85,86题)甘遂配牵牛子可用于()(
关于精液的描述,错误的是
25岁初孕妇,36周妊娠。因重度妊娠高血压综合征入院,检查:血压160/110mmHg,心率78次/分,血红蛋白100g/L,血清总蛋白55g/L,白蛋白25g/L,血K+、Na+、Cl正常,选择合适的扩容药是
下列关于针刺足三里、中脘、天枢等腧穴治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的叙述,错误的是
A、可溶片B、泡腾片C、缓释片D、控释片E、阴道片片剂中的药物应是易溶性的,加水产生气泡后应能溶解
()是指建筑成品表现在自然状态下的简单点数所表示的个、条、樘、块等计量单位。
主题统觉测验的开创者是()
如下关于μCOS–II/III的说法,正确的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)