首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
An important part of police strategy, rapid police response is seen by police officers and the public alike as offering tremendo
An important part of police strategy, rapid police response is seen by police officers and the public alike as offering tremendo
admin
2013-02-03
50
问题
An important part of police strategy, rapid police response is seen by police officers and the public alike as offering tremendous benefits. The more obvious ones are the ability of police to apply first-aid lifesaving techniques quickly and the greater likelihood of arresting people who may have participated in a crime. It aids in identifying those who witnessed an emergency or crime, as well as in collecting evidence. The overall reputation of a police department, too, is enhanced if rapid response is consistent, and this in itself promotes the prevention of crime. Needless to say, rapid response offers the public some degree of satisfaction in its police force.
While these may be the desired consequences of rapid police response, actual research has not shown it to be quite so beneficial. For example, it has been demonstrated that rapid response leads to a greater likelihood of arrest only if responses are in the order of 1-2 minutes after a call is received by the police. When response times increase to 3-4 minutes--still quite a rapid response-- the likelihood of an arrest is substantially reduced. Similarly, in identifying witnesses to emergencies or crimes, police are far more likely to be successful if they arrive at the scene no more than four minutes on average, after receiving a call for help. Yet both police officers and the public define ’rapid response’ as responding up to 10-12 minutes after calling the police for help.
Should police assume all the responsibility for ensuring a rapid response? Studies have shown that people tend to delay after an incident occurs before contacting the police. A crime victim may be injured and thus unable to call for help, for example, or no telephone may be available at the scene of the incident. Often, however, there is no such physical barrier to calling the police. Indeed, it is very common for crime victims to call their parents, their minister, or even their insurance company first. When the police are finally called in such cases the effectiveness of even the most rapid of responses is greatly diminished.
The effectiveness of rapid response also needs to be seen in light of the nature of the crime. For example, when someone rings the police after discovering their television set has been stolen from their home, there is little point, in terms of identifying those responsible for the crime, in ensuring a very rapid response. It is common in such burglary or theft cases that the victim discovers the crime hours, days, even weeks after it has occurred. When the victim is directly involved in the crime, however, as in the case of a robbery, rapid response, provided the victim was quickly able to contact the police, is more likely to be advantageous. Based on statistics comparing crimes that are discovered and those in which the victim is directly involved. Spelman and Brown (1981) suggest that three in four calls to police need not be met with rapid response.
It becomes clear that the importance of response time in collecting evidence or catching criminals after a crime must be weighed against a variety of factors. Yet because police department officials assume the public strongly demands rapid response, they believe that every call to the police should be met with it. Studies have shown, however, that while the public wants quick response, more important is the information given by the police to the person asking for help. K a caller is told the police will arrive in five minutes but in fact it takes ten minutes or more, waiting the extra time can be extremely frustrating. But if a caller is told he or she will have to wait 10 minutes and the police indeed arrive within that time, the caller is normally satisfied. Thus, rather than emphasizing rapid response, the focus of energies should be on establishing realistic expectations in the caller and making every attempt to meet them.
What is the main topic of the passage?
选项
答案
rapid response
解析
(本文主要讲的是极速反应,包括其重要性及在不同案件中的作用等。)
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/YWyK777K
本试题收录于:
A类竞赛(研究生)题库大学生英语竞赛(NECCS)分类
0
A类竞赛(研究生)
大学生英语竞赛(NECCS)
相关试题推荐
AncientGreeksthoughtthebrainwasn’tthebasisforintellect.Itwasthehomeforthesoul.Theybelievedthattheprocessof
AncientGreeksthoughtthebrainwasn’tthebasisforintellect.Itwasthehomeforthesoul.Theybelievedthattheprocessof
Alice’sAdventuresinWonderland(oftenshortenedtoAliceinWonderland)isgenerallythoughtofasoneofthegreatestbooksf
Alice’sAdventuresinWonderland(oftenshortenedtoAliceinWonderland)isgenerallythoughtofasoneofthegreatestbooksf
______,computerhasplayedanimportantroleinmodernlife.
Ourmodemcivilizationmustnotbethoughtofas______inashortperiodoftime.
TheMid-AutumnFestivalisanimportantfestivalinsomeAsiancountries.Becausethedateofthisfestivalissetaccordingto
Ifyouwanttoset_________acompany,youmust_________theregulationslaiddownbytheauthorities.
HolmesandWatsonhadapprehendedthreepeopleonsuspicionofshoplifting.Thethree,aman,awomanandaboy,wereinterview
随机试题
精心制作的,详细阐述的,精细的adj.e________
氨基酸在等电点溶液中,具有的特点是
解剖式垫的主要作用是
对全口义齿固位有利的口腔黏膜是
电算化后,部分会计核算的管理方法需要修改,那么下列()说法是不正确的。
刘某,男,42岁,某村党支部书记。该村有两户村民的羊被盗,他们怀疑是本村两名村民所为,便报告给村党支部书记刘某。刘某命治保主任把其中的一名村民叫到村部询问,并派人向乡里报告。当晚,刘某对这名村民辱骂、踢打、刑讯逼供,这个村民交代了偷羊的过程。为追查其他户失
你负责低保发放工作,有人大叫说制度不公平,同时有媒体记者在场,领导让你处理此事,你会怎么做?
A.youdon’tmakethesamemistaketwiceB.it’sexcitingandchallengingC.soIdoexercisestocalmmyselfdownD.Whydidyo
设实对称矩阵A满足A2-3A+2E=O,证明:A为正定矩阵.
设a1,a2,…,an是一组n维向量,证明它们线性无关的充分必要条件是任一n维向量都可由它们线性表示。
最新回复
(
0
)