首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page. For each question(1
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page. For each question(1
admin
2015-01-27
79
问题
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page.
For each question(15-20), mark one letter(A, B, C or D)on your Answer Sheet.
Recruitment Process Outsourcing
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO— has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while. Given that employers have been seeking help in their recruiting efforts for decades, it seems odd that the rise of RPO as a service solution has taken so long. Isn’t outsourcing of non-core functions a widely accepted business strategy? Isn’t recruiting one of the largest line items for many organisations and not a core function?
Today, however, organisations that consider outsourcing their recruiting efforts can pore over and compare tangible outcomes seen by those successful early adopters of RPO. But tread lightly. There have been a number of very public RPO failures where results have fallen woefully short of expectations, sending business leaders and the marketplace back into the boardroom to debate yet again the viability and sustainability of the solution. Can RPO be truly successful? If there are companies out there who are reaping the proposed benefits of outsourcing, what are they doing that others are not? The fact is there are common elements—let’s even call them tenets—that when followed, can greatly increase the effectiveness and ultimate outcomes of the RPO solution. Before we look at those tenets, however, it’s important to understand the history of RPO.
Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adjunct to an organisation’s internal staffing initiatives. Utilising the approach was simple: call your preferred recruiter(s)with a job description and expect screened candidates to be sent to you. Overall, this process continues to serve as a highly scalable option in many talent acquisition strategies, but it is extremely costly. Moreover, based on the transactional nature of the relationship, it comes with high risk and little accountability for results.
Companies soon realised they could bring the same talent in-house as contractors— their intentions clearly centered on achieving the same scalability but with reduced cost and greater control of the outcomes. In practice though, this model proved to be almost as expensive as high agency utilisation and surprisingly, with co-employment and other new issues, even more complex. Worse yet, the rates for contractors continued to climb as corporate recruiters began to seek out these new, more highly paid " nomad" positions instead of their corporate roles. The desired "direct sourcing" impact these recruiters were supposed to have never materialized as skills, and innovative approaches floundered without the access to best practices and innovative techniques that contingency recruiting agencies cultivated.
At the same time, traditional recruiting providers began to assume a more prominent role in assisting their customers with new ways to handle huge spikes in hiring. Although this represented a new challenge for both companies and providers, the solutions were primarily project-based and, therefore, rarely focused on achieving strategic improvements.
Over time, the RPO paradigm changed to finally justify its title, while providers literally began assuming delivery of an organisation’s internal staffing function. This early model was fraught with mistiming because most organisations treated RPO solutions like earlier transactional recruiting solutions. In addition, most providers simply weren’t ready to deliver at the levels they had signed up for. As the burgeoning industry learns from itself, organisations have honed their approach to RPO vendor management and some providers have refined their solutions to near industry-standard levels.
What will the author talk about in the following paragraph?
选项
A、He will continue to talk about the history of RPO.
B、He will talk about the principles of raising the efficiency and end result of the RPO solution.
C、He will talk about the types of RPO.
D、He will talk about different RPO solutions.
答案
B
解析
文中第二段提到“Before we look at those tenets,however,it’s important to under一stand the history of RPO.”即:我们在看这些原则之前,先了解一下招聘流程外包的发展历史,所以,B项符台题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Yg7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Inthispart,theinterlocutorasksquestionstoeachofthecandidatesinturn.Youhavetogiveinformationaboutyourselfand
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
(Thecandidatechoosesonetopicandspeaksaboutitforoneminute.)A.MarketResearch:theimportanceofdoingmarketresearc
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
Question询问
Askingquestions查询
Answeringreceptionist’squestions回答接待员询问
随机试题
中国革命最基本的动力是
慢性特发性血小板减少性紫癜骨髓象的特点是
工程质量事故处理方案的类型有( )。
施工过程中,出现施工图纸变更导致项目特征与招标工程量清单项目特征描述不符时,综合单价的确定应以()的项目特征为准。
按照在生产中所起的作用分类,龙门吊属于()。
诉讼时效期间从知道或应当知道权利被侵害时起计算。但是,从权利被侵害之日起超过( )的,人民法院不予保护。
决定教育发展的规模和速度的关键因素是政治经济制度。
折冲府
妇女A是精神病人,生下女儿B,她的丈夫C对她不管不问,结果A所在的单位D对其履行监护权,一监护就是23年。现在A的弟弟E看到A有工资卡和公房使用权,主动提出承担监护职责,D单位同意,交付了A的工资卡和住房使用权。但是E并没有履行监护职责,他把A送入养老院,
Inordertolivealongerlife,whatshouldpeopledo?
最新回复
(
0
)