首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Whose Grave is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for t
Whose Grave is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for t
admin
2013-08-12
58
问题
Whose Grave is This Anyway?
There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for thousands of years along the Nero River. In reality though, this silence has constantly been disturbed by a great variety of people. While considering their different motivations in doing so, we must examine whether disturbing the ancient tombs is justifiable or worthy of condemnation.
(A)
hen Howard Carter and his party opened the tomb of the Egyptian king Tutankhamen in 1922, there was rejoicing around the world.(B)
he tomb was largely intact and not seriously pillaged by ancient grave robbers, so it still contained the wonderful artifacts that had been buried with the young king more than three millennia earlier.(C)
Over the next several years Carter and his team systematically photographed and catalogued the objects from the tomb, then transported them to the Cairo Museum.(D)
There is a certain irony in this story that raises complex ethical questions. Why are Carter and his
party
not called grave robbers? Why are their actions in stripping the tomb acceptable—even praiseworthy—when similar behavior by common thieves would be deplored? No matter who opens a tomb and takes away its contents, that person is violating the intentions of
those
who sealed the tomb originally. No matter what the motivation, a human body that was meant to rest in peace for all time has been disturbed. Should this not make us feel uncomfortable?
From the beginning, some were uneasy about the propriety of unearthing Tutankhamen’s remains. When Lord Carnarvon, Carter’s sponsor, died suddenly from a mosquito bite, and several others connected with the project experienced tragedies, rumors arose about the "curse of King Tut". But Carter himself died peacefully many years later, and the talk subsided.
Perhaps it is the passage of time that transforms grave robbing into archaeology.
Carter would no doubt have been outraged if, say, his grandmother’s coffin had been dug up to strip the body of its jewelry. But after three thousand years Tutankhamen has no living relatives to protest his disturbance.
Perhaps it is a question of the words we use to describe such ancient finds. We speak of Tutankhamen’s "mummy", and mummy is a clean, historical-sounding word. Parents bring their children to museums to see the mummies and mummy cases. We can almost forget that a mummy is the embalmed body of a dead human being, pulled out of its coffin so that we can marvel at the coffin and sometimes the body itself.
Or, perhaps the difference between grave robbing and archaeology lies in the motives of the perpetrators. Common thieves are motivated by greed, by their quest for money to be made by selling stolen objects. Carter and his team did not sell the treasures from Tutankhamen’s tomb but stored them safely in the Cairo Museum, where art lovers from around the world can see them.
They
were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people of our century and centuries to come(while at the same time, one must point out, acquiring significant glory for themselves).
The basic issue is a
clash
of cultural values. To the Egyptians, it was normal and correct to bury their finest artworks with the exalted dead. To us, the idea of all that beauty being locked away in the dark forever seems an appalling waste. We want to bring it into the light, to have it as part of our precious artistic
heritage
. Almost no one, having seen these magnificent treasures, would seriously propose they be put back in the tomb and sealed up.
In the end, inevitably, our cultural values will prevail simply because we are still here and the ancient Egyptians are not. After three thousand years, Tutankhamen’s grave really isn’t his anymore. Whether right or wrong, it belongs to us.
The word
those
in Paragraph 3 refers to______.
选项
A、Carter and his party
B、grave robbers
C、ancient Egyptians
D、the contents of the tomb
答案
C
解析
本题属于指代题,考查考生认定代词与篇章中其他词语的指代关系的能力。题目问:文章中的those指代的是什么?根据第3段,those后有一个who引导的定语从句“who sealedthe tomb originally”,即“最早封墓的人”,来修饰限定those。而最早封墓的人应该是古代埃及人,因此选C项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/YhfO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
Completethetablebelow:WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
Completetheformbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
Completetheformbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
Completethesentencesbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.Studentsneedafrontdoorkeybetween【T15】___
Completethenotesbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.WRITINGPaycarefulattentiontothequestion
Completethenotesbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.WRITINGPaycarefulattentiontothequestion
Bilingualismcanbedefinedashavinganequallevelofcommunicative______intwoormorelanguages.
Bilingualismcanbedefinedashavinganequallevelofcommunicative______intwoormorelanguages.
AMessengerfromthePastHispeoplesaidgood-byeandwatchedhimwalkofftowardthemountains.Theyhadlittlereasonto
DorothyCrowfootHodgkinWhenDorothyCrowfootHodgkinwastenyearsold,shewatchedherfirstcrystalsformonastringda
随机试题
阅读苏轼《前赤壁赋》中的一段文字,然后回答下列小题。苏子曰:“客亦知夫水与月乎?逝者如斯,而未尝往也;盈虚者如彼,而卒莫消长也。盖将自其变者而观之,则天地曾不能以一瞬;自其不变者而观之,则物与我皆无尽也,而又何羡乎?且夫天地之间,物各有主,苟非吾
宋代的陈无择创立三因学说,将饮食劳倦,跌仆金刃归为
采集粪便标本检查阿米巴原虫前,将便盆加热的目的是
某男子在人来人往的马路上裸奔,经警察多次给以行政处罚后仍不改悔,一次又在马路上裸奔,遭多人围观,被警察抓获。下列正确的选项有:
A企业2004年6气购入设备一台,买价10万元,增值税1.7万元,支付的运费等其他费用共计3.3万元,当月设备交付使用,预计可使用10年,预计净残值率为5%。企业采用平均年限法计提折旧,则该设备当年应提折旧额为()元。
根据《个人所得税法》及其实施条例的规定,以下各项所得,()适用超额累进税率计征个人所得税。
“满纸荒唐言,一把辛酸泪。都云作者痴,谁解其中味?”是我国古典文学名著《红楼梦》的开篇诗。()
在本次学术座谈会中,张嘉、莫非、刘涛应邀出席并都受到主席的嘉奖记功,记功分为一等功、二等功、三等功。三人均对受到的记功闭口不言,但神通广大的记者仍对三人的获奖情况找到了蛛丝马迹,据悉最终的嘉奖记功符合以下条件:(1)如果张嘉记二等功,则莫非记三等功。(
ManyforeignerswhohavenotvisitedBritaincallalltheinhabitantsEnglish,fortheyareusedtothinkingoftheBritishIsle
下列关于C++预定义流对象的叙述中,正确的是
最新回复
(
0
)