首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Whose Grave is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for t
Whose Grave is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for t
admin
2013-08-12
46
问题
Whose Grave is This Anyway?
There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for thousands of years along the Nero River. In reality though, this silence has constantly been disturbed by a great variety of people. While considering their different motivations in doing so, we must examine whether disturbing the ancient tombs is justifiable or worthy of condemnation.
(A)
hen Howard Carter and his party opened the tomb of the Egyptian king Tutankhamen in 1922, there was rejoicing around the world.(B)
he tomb was largely intact and not seriously pillaged by ancient grave robbers, so it still contained the wonderful artifacts that had been buried with the young king more than three millennia earlier.(C)
Over the next several years Carter and his team systematically photographed and catalogued the objects from the tomb, then transported them to the Cairo Museum.(D)
There is a certain irony in this story that raises complex ethical questions. Why are Carter and his
party
not called grave robbers? Why are their actions in stripping the tomb acceptable—even praiseworthy—when similar behavior by common thieves would be deplored? No matter who opens a tomb and takes away its contents, that person is violating the intentions of
those
who sealed the tomb originally. No matter what the motivation, a human body that was meant to rest in peace for all time has been disturbed. Should this not make us feel uncomfortable?
From the beginning, some were uneasy about the propriety of unearthing Tutankhamen’s remains. When Lord Carnarvon, Carter’s sponsor, died suddenly from a mosquito bite, and several others connected with the project experienced tragedies, rumors arose about the "curse of King Tut". But Carter himself died peacefully many years later, and the talk subsided.
Perhaps it is the passage of time that transforms grave robbing into archaeology.
Carter would no doubt have been outraged if, say, his grandmother’s coffin had been dug up to strip the body of its jewelry. But after three thousand years Tutankhamen has no living relatives to protest his disturbance.
Perhaps it is a question of the words we use to describe such ancient finds. We speak of Tutankhamen’s "mummy", and mummy is a clean, historical-sounding word. Parents bring their children to museums to see the mummies and mummy cases. We can almost forget that a mummy is the embalmed body of a dead human being, pulled out of its coffin so that we can marvel at the coffin and sometimes the body itself.
Or, perhaps the difference between grave robbing and archaeology lies in the motives of the perpetrators. Common thieves are motivated by greed, by their quest for money to be made by selling stolen objects. Carter and his team did not sell the treasures from Tutankhamen’s tomb but stored them safely in the Cairo Museum, where art lovers from around the world can see them.
They
were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people of our century and centuries to come(while at the same time, one must point out, acquiring significant glory for themselves).
The basic issue is a
clash
of cultural values. To the Egyptians, it was normal and correct to bury their finest artworks with the exalted dead. To us, the idea of all that beauty being locked away in the dark forever seems an appalling waste. We want to bring it into the light, to have it as part of our precious artistic
heritage
. Almost no one, having seen these magnificent treasures, would seriously propose they be put back in the tomb and sealed up.
In the end, inevitably, our cultural values will prevail simply because we are still here and the ancient Egyptians are not. After three thousand years, Tutankhamen’s grave really isn’t his anymore. Whether right or wrong, it belongs to us.
The word
those
in Paragraph 3 refers to______.
选项
A、Carter and his party
B、grave robbers
C、ancient Egyptians
D、the contents of the tomb
答案
C
解析
本题属于指代题,考查考生认定代词与篇章中其他词语的指代关系的能力。题目问:文章中的those指代的是什么?根据第3段,those后有一个who引导的定语从句“who sealedthe tomb originally”,即“最早封墓的人”,来修饰限定those。而最早封墓的人应该是古代埃及人,因此选C项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/YhfO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
Completethenotesbelow:WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.Threefactorscontributingtotheefficiencyoftheag
Completethesentencesbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.Nonoiseafter9pm.Smokingonlyallowed
Completethesentencesbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.Studentsneedafrontdoorkeybetween【T15】___
Completetheexplanationoftheroomnumber.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
Completethetablebelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
Betweenwhattimesistheroadtrafficlightest?
Bilingualismcanbedefinedashavinganequallevelofcommunicative______intwoormorelanguages.
AMessengerfromthePastHispeoplesaidgood-byeandwatchedhimwalkofftowardthemountains.Theyhadlittlereasonto
AMessengerfromthePastHispeoplesaidgood-byeandwatchedhimwalkofftowardthemountains.Theyhadlittlereasonto
"PhysicsClass"Howdoestheprofessorexplaintheclosedstring?
随机试题
国际货币基金组织(IMF)2016年1月27日发表声明,宣布该组织2010年份额和治理改革方案正式生效。中国正式成为IMF()
Wilms瘤
儿童感染戊肝病毒后,常表现为
《保护文学艺术作品伯尔尼公约》的基本原则有以下哪几项?()
工程项目绩效报告利用工程项目执行“期间”的关键指标、目标、风险和设想等因素进行监控,是工程项目的()。
经修订的《中华人民共和国城市房地产管理法》自()起施行。
2015年6月20日,某期货公司挪用客户保证金3亿元。截至2016年9月,该期货公司已将前述保证金偿还,如果该期货公司首席风险官发现公司有上述问题,下列说法正确的是()。
甲公司为增值税一般纳税人,适用的增值税税率为13%。2019年9月发生部分经济业务如下:(1)2日,外购原材料一批,取得货物增值税专用发票注明的价款为100万元,增值税税额为13万元,取得运费增值税专用发票注明的运费为2万元,增值税税额为0.
循循善诱、以理服人,从提高学生认识入手以调动学生主动性的德育原则是()。
论述当前学科课程和活动课程大讨论。
最新回复
(
0
)