首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
You will hear an interview with Steven Casey, on human factors in design. As you listen, answer the questions or complete the no
You will hear an interview with Steven Casey, on human factors in design. As you listen, answer the questions or complete the no
admin
2019-08-17
73
问题
You will hear an interview with Steven Casey, on human factors in design. As you listen, answer the questions or complete the notes in your test booklet for Questions 21 to 30 by writing no more than three words in the space provided on the right. You will hear the interview twice. You now have 1 minute to read Questions 21 to 30.
W: At the beginning of the book, you give a quote by the ecologist, Garrett Hardin: "People are the core element in all technology. " Do designers tend to forget that?
M: Well, it is often forgotten. Not just designers but engineers, and I think the stories in the book tend to speak to that point—make examples of instances in which engineers or designers didn’t incorporate human factors into the design of the system or the product.
W: As technology becomes more sophisticated, do you think human error is actually increasing or it’s just becoming more noticeable?
M: I think it’s probably a case of both. The systems are more complex, and it’s also more noticeable because as things become more sophisticated, one individual has so much more power to disrupt the system—whether it’s a nuclear power plant or an aircraft with 555 people on board. The opportunities for amplifying the consequences of error are increasing all the time.
W: Instead of user error, you prefer the term "design-induced error". Is it ever appropriate to blame the user?
M: I use the term as it’s commonly used in this field, "design-induced error" , and the stories that I’ve selected for the book really focus on the user interface. I’ve tried to select stories where there is a deficiency in the system or the actual interface that the operator uses could have been done better.
W: I ask because in several of the stories, it seems there were adequate procedures in place, but the users just decided not to follow them.
M: That is true. In the lead story, for example, "The Atomic Chef" , there were procedures in place. There was a very expensive and elaborate system for making the uranium fuel for this breeder reactor, but the three operators, along with their supervisors, did make the decision simply not to use the system that had been put into place to avoid exactly the kind of accident that happened. In 1999, two workers were killed at Japan’s JCO Nuclear Fuel Processing Facility when a solution they were mixing reached nuclear criticality. But again, I think it’s a good example of a systemic problem within an organization. The whole social aspect of that setting was as important as, say, a one-on-one operator interface, and these issues, I think will become increasingly important in the future.
W: You run your own human-factors research and design firm. Do clients generally call you before or after something goes wrong?
M: Most of the time it’s before. Occasionally I do get involved in something where there has been a problem, or the client is aware of a problem, or oftentimes they’ll know that, say, a competitor’s product does a better job in this regard in terms of its ease of use, for example. So it’s both, really.
W: Do you see patterns in the issues they are facing?
M: Most of my work is with vehicles of one kind or another, whether they are automobiles or aircraft or agricultural or construction machines, so the types of things that I deal with are surprisingly consistent from one machine to the next. I do tend to see similar issues as technologies migrate from one class of vehicle to another—or example, GPS systems migrating from cars into farm equipment, and so forth, so I see similar types of issues.
W: What’s the answer in all these? Should designers be involved in real users in their work?
M: Absolutely. There is no question about that. And they should also involve human-factors experts. And I don’t think there is any question that designers in general are increasingly using users and seeking user input in the design of products and systems.
W: Can we ever expect to eliminate human error entirely?
M: No, and it wouldn’t be expected, but what we can do, knowing what we do know about human behavior and people’s expectations and their talents and their deficiencies, is strive to minimize the likelihood of operator error.
W: One last question: Did these sorts of errors ever happen to you?
M: Oh, no, I’m perfect. Ha... Sure, I have trouble operating my VCR just like everybody else. So, yes, they do happen to me, and I’m probably as intolerant as most people in terms of experiencing frustrations with devices that should be, and could be, a lot easier to use.
选项
答案
disrupt the system
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/YjWd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
WhatkindofoverviewdoesthebookintendtogiveaboutAmericansociety?
WhatkindofoverviewdoesthebookintendtogiveaboutAmericansociety?
WhatkindofoverviewdoesthebookintendtogiveaboutAmericansociety?
Theauthormentionsthatshehashadtodeveloptimemanagementskills.Oldparent-studentsaregoodlisteners,midwaybetween
OnehundredandthirteenmillionAmericanshaveatleastonebank-issuedcreditcard.Theygivetheirownersautomatic(31)ins
OnehundredandthirteenmillionAmericanshaveatleastonebank-issuedcreditcard.Theygivetheirownersautomatic(31)ins
OnehundredandthirteenmillionAmericanshaveatleastonebank-issuedcreditcard.Theygivetheirownersautomatic(31)ins
Psychologistssaytherearetwodifferentkindsofloneliness.
Psychologistssaytherearetwodifferentkindsofloneliness.
随机试题
利用资源管理器为D盘的某个文件夹在桌面上创建快捷方式,可以用鼠标左键直接拖动该文件夹到桌面创建。()
患儿,诊断多发性抽动症。症见肌肉抽动,喉中痰鸣,怪声不断,偶有骂人,烦躁口渴,舌质红,苔黄腻,脉滑数。应首选
女,40岁。10年前因胆结石行胆囊切除术,术后病情痊愈。2年前单位倒闭,患者被安排到另一单位看大门,觉得看大门很没面子,但为生活着想又不得不去上班。1年前患者出现胆羹区皮肤触摸疼痛、胃胀不适伴阵发性心悸、胸闷、失眠、心情不好。患者四处求医,反复做过腹部B超
卵巢内侧与宫角之间的韧带称为
位于A省某市区的一家建筑企业为增值税一般纳税人,在B省某市区提供写字楼和桥梁建造业务,2019年3月具体经营业务如下:(1)写字楼项目按照工程进度及合同约定。本月取得含税收入300万元,并开具了增值税专用发票。该建筑企业将部分业务进行了分包,本月支付分包
不同的时代有不同的流行语,不同的流行语又反过来影响它的时代。有些时候,流行语可以破除旧制度造成的思维定式,从而更高效地推进制度改革。比如,从“一颗红心两手准备”到“穿草鞋还是穿皮鞋”的流行语变化,就是从一味强调服从,变成把选择权交还给个人。流行语的表述往往
分析下述论证在概念、论证方法、论据及结论等方面的有效性。600字左右。“政府应该提高邮资的价格,以改变邮政服务恶化的现象。毫无疑问,这种解决方法是有效的,因为收入会随着邮资价格的提高而增加,同时邮件数量会相应地减少。这样可消除现有邮政体制的束缚
AinfectedbodyfluidsBagainsttheoutbreakseverityCthemodeoftransmissionDtheinitialdaysofbeinginfectedEthreec
I’dbeenlivingwithmywifeforeightyearsandonenight"mom"says,"Iguessyouguysarenevergonnagetmarried.Imean,yo
A、Theyextendtheirwaterpipes.B、Theygiveoutfaintcries.C、Theymakenoisestodriveinsectsaway.D、Theybecomeaselastic
最新回复
(
0
)