首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Moral responsibility is all very well, but what about military orders? Is it not the soldier’s duty to give instant obedience to
Moral responsibility is all very well, but what about military orders? Is it not the soldier’s duty to give instant obedience to
admin
2013-10-11
90
问题
Moral responsibility is all very well, but what about military orders? Is it not the soldier’s duty to give instant obedience to orders given by his military superiors? And apart from duty, will not the soldier suffer severe punishment, even death, if he refuses to do what he is ordered to? If, then, a soldier is told by his superior to burn this house or to shoot that prisoner, how can he be held criminally accountable on the ground’ that the burning or shooting was a violation of the laws of war?
These are some of the questions that are raised by the concept commonly called "superior orders", and its use as a defense in war crimes trials. It is an issue that must be as old as the laws of war themselves, and it emerged in legal guise over three centuries ago when, after the Stuart restoration in 1660, the commander of the guards at the trial and execution of Charles I was put on trial for treason and murder. The officer defended himself on the ground "that all I did was as a soldier, by the command of my superior officer whom I must obey or die," but the court gave him short shrift, saying that "When the command is traitorous, then the obedience to that command is also traitorous①."
Though not precisely articulated, the rule that is necessarily implied by this decision is that it is the soldier’s duty to obey lawful orders, but that he may disobey—and indeed must, under some circum stances-unlawful orders. Such has been the law of the United States since the birth of the nation. In 1804, Chief Justice John Marshall declared that superior orders would justify a subordinate’s conduct only "if not to perform a prohibited act," and there are many other early decisions to the same effect.
A strikingly illustrative case occurred in the wake of that conflict which most Englishmen have never heard ( although their troops burned the White House) and which we call the War of 1812. Our country was baldly split by that war too and, at a time when the United States Navy was not especially popular in New England, the ship-in-the-line Independence was lying in Boston Harbor. A passer-by directed abusive language at a marine standing guard on the ship, and the marine, Bevans by name, ran his bayonet through the man. Charged with murder, Bevans produced evidence that the marines on the Independence had been ordered to bayonet anyone showing them disrespect. The case was tried before Justice Joseph Story, next to Marshall, the leading judicial figure of those years, who charged that any such order as Bevans had invoked "would be illegal and void," and, if given and put into practice, both the superior and the subordinate would be guilty of murder②. In consequence, Bevans was convicted.
The order allegedly given to Bevans was pretty drastic, and Boston Harbor was not a battlefield; per haps it was not too much to expect the marine to realize that literal compliance might lead to bad trouble. But it is only too easy to conceive of circumstances where the matter might not be at all clear. Does the sub ordinate obey at peril that the order may later be ruled illegal, or is protected unless he has a good reason to doubt its validity?
It can be inferred from the first paragraph that if a soldier obeys his superior’s order to burn a house or to kill a prisoner, ______.
选项
A、he is fight according to moral standards
B、he should not receive any punishment
C、he should certainly be liable for his action
D、he will be convicted according to the law of war
答案
B
解析
推理判断题。根据文章第一段最后一句话,可以推知虽然烧房子和枪杀俘虏是违反战争法的,但因为服从命令是士兵职责内的事,并且从表述的反问语气上(士兵是奉命行事,怎么就能以烧杀抢掠违反战争法定罪呢?)我们知道这个士兵不应该受到惩罚。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/YnGK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
It’ssaidthemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringsomething
It’ssaidthemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringsomething
It’ssaidthemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringsomething
It’ssaidthemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringsomething
It’ssaidthemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringsomething
It’ssaidthemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringsomething
Royaltyandasenseofresponsibilityare______toastablemarriage.
Thesoldierfoundhimself______aherowhenhereturnedtohisvillage.
—"Howdidthegroupimproveitsdiscussion?"—"Theyalltookpart,eachmember______theresponsibilityofleadingonemeeting.
TheartofpublicspeakingbeganinancientGreeceover2,000yearsago.Now,twitter,instantmessenging,e-mail,blogsandcha
随机试题
敬业就是以一种严肃认真的态度对待工作,下列不符合的是()。
结核性胸膜炎胸痛病人取咯血窒息的病人取
超长桩、大直径扩底桩和嵌岩桩不宜采用低应变反射波法测定单桩轴向抗压极限承载力。()
规定了票面利率,但是债券持有人必须在债券到期时一次性获得还本付息,存续期间没有利息支付的债券是()
在PgeMker中,可以通过()来设定“页码”的表示方法是阿拉伯数字还是罗马数字。
选择抽样方案时应考虑()。
某研究试图检验两种心理疗法对演讲恐惧症的治疗效果。研究者选取80名在公开场合存在严重演讲问题的大学生,把他们分成两组。第一组20人,由第一位心理治疗师施行行为疗法;第二组20人,由第二位心理治疗师施行认知疗法;第三组20人,由第三位心理治疗师进行无用无害的
使用VC6打开考生文件夹下的源程序文件modi1.cpp,该程序运行时有错,请改正其中的错误,使程序正常运行,即使程序在界面输出以下类似内容:0012FF6810012FF3C50012FF6C20012FF444
A--governmentassignmentB--openmarketvalueC--costofdevelopmentD--profession
A、Gohomeat5o’clock.B、WorktogetherwithMr.Golden.C、Typesomeletters.D、Helpthewoman.C从回答中可以得知男士不能帮女士的忙了,因为Mr.Golden
最新回复
(
0
)