首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Is College a Worthy Investment? A)Why are we spending so much money on college? And why are we so unhappy about it? We all seem
Is College a Worthy Investment? A)Why are we spending so much money on college? And why are we so unhappy about it? We all seem
admin
2014-01-19
54
问题
Is College a Worthy Investment?
A)Why are we spending so much money on college? And why are we so unhappy about it? We all seem to agree that a college education is wonderful, and yet strangely we worry when we see families investing so much in this supposedly essential good. Maybe it’s time to ask a question that seems almost sacrilegious(大不敬的): is all this investment in college education really worth it?
B)The answer, I fear, is no. For an increasing number of kids, the extra time and money spent pursuing a college diploma will leave them worse off than they were before they set foot on campus.
C)For my entire adult life, a good education has been the most important thing for middle-class households. My parents spent more educating my sister and me than they spent on their house, and they’re not the only ones... and, of course, for an increasing number of families, most of the cost of their house is actually the cost of living in a good school district. Questioning the value of a college education seems a bit like questioning the value of happiness, or fun.
D)The average price of all goods and services has risen about 50 percent. But the price of a college education has nearly doubled in that time. Is the education that today’s students are getting twice as good? Are new workers twice as smart? Have they become somehow massively more expensive to educate?
E)Perhaps a bit. Richard Vedder, an Ohio University economics professor, says, "I look at the data. and I see college costs rising faster than inflation up to the mid-1980s by 1 percent a year. Now I see them rising 3 to 4 percent a year over inflation. What has happened? The federal government has started dropping money out of airplanes." Aid has increased, subsidized(补贴的)loans have become available, and "the universities have gotten the money." Economist Bryan Caplan, who is writing a book about education, agrees: "It’s a giant waste of resources that will continue as long as the subsidies continue." F)Promotional literature for colleges and student loans often speaks of debt as an " investment in yourself. " But an investment is supposed to generate income to pay off the loans. More than half of all recent graduates are unemployed or in jobs that do not require a degree, and the amount of student-loan debt carried by households has increased more than five times since 1999. These graduates were told that a diploma was all they needed to succeed, but it won’t even get them out of the spare bedroom at Mom and Dad’s. For many, the most visible result of their four years is the loan payments, which now average hundreds of dollars a month on loan balances in the tens of thousands.
G)It’s true about the money—sort of. College graduates now make 80 percent more than people who have only a high-school diploma, and though there are no precise estimates, the wage premium(高出的部分)for an outstanding school seems to be even higher. But that’s not true of every student. It’s very easy to spend four years majoring in English literature and come out no more employable than you were before you went in. Conversely, chemical engineers straight out of school can easily make almost four times the wages of an entry-level high-school graduate.
H)James Heckman, the Nobel Prize-winning economist, has examined how the returns on education break down for individuals with different backgrounds and levels of ability. "Even with these high prices, you’re still finding a high return for individuals who are bright and motivated," he says. On the other hand, "if you’re not college ready, then the answer is no, it’s not worth it." Experts tend to agree that for the average student, college is still worth it today, but they also agree that the rapid increase in price is eating up more and more of the potential return. For borderline students, tuition(学费)rise can push those returns into negative territory.
I)Everyone seems to agree that the government, and parents, should be rethinking how we invest in higher education—and that employers need to rethink the increasing use of college degrees as crude screening tools for jobs that don’t really require college skills. "Employers seeing a surplus of college graduates and looking to fill jobs are just adding that requirement," says Vedder. "In fact, a college degree becomes a job requirement for becoming a bar-tender."
J)We have started to see some change on the finance side. A law passed in 2007 allows many students to cap their loan payment at 10 percent of their income and forgives any balance after 25 years. But of course, that doesn’t control the cost of education; it just shifts it to taxpayers. It also encourages graduates to choose lower-paying careers, which reduces the financial return to education still further. "You’re subsidizing people to become priests and poets and so forth," says Heckman. "You may think that’s a good thing, or you may not." Either way it will be expensive for the government.
K)What might be a lot cheaper is putting more kids to work. Caplan notes that work also builds valuable skills—probably more valuable for kids who don’t naturally love sitting in a classroom. Heckman agrees wholeheartedly:" People are different, and those abilities can be shaped. That’s what we’ve learned, and public policy should recognize that."
L)Heckman would like to see more apprenticeship-style(学徒式)programs, where kids can learn in the workplace—learn not just specific job skills, but the kind of "soft skills." like getting to work on time and getting along with a team, that are crucial for career success. "It’s about having mentors(指导者)and having workplace-based education," he says. "Time and again I’ve seen examples of this kind of program working."
M)Ah, but how do we get there from here? With better public policy, hopefully, but also by making better individual decisions. "Historically markets have been able to handle these things," says Vedder. "and I think eventually markets will handle this one. If it doesn’t improve soon, people are going tp wake up and ask, ’Why am I going to college?’"
More kids should be encouraged to participate in programs where they can learn not only job skills but also social skills.
选项
答案
L
解析
细节推断题。定位句指出,学徒式项目可以让年轻人在工作中学习——不只是学习专业工作技能,同时也学到“软技能”的东西,比如准时上班、与团队相处融洽等,这些对事业成功是至关重要的。题干中not only job skills but also socialskills对应原文中的learn not just specific jobskills,but the kind of“soft skills,”因此答案为L)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/YqS7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
1.有些人认为老人应该和子女生活在一起,有些人不同意这一看法;2.你认为哪种做法合适,说出你的理由。OlderPeopleLivingwithAdultChildren
Everyfathershould______himselfagainstprematuredeathorprolongedillnessforthesakeofhiswifeandchildren.
Thereisnodenyingthatstudentsshouldlearnsomethingabouthowcomputerswork,justasweexpectthematleasttounderstan
Theprospectsforwomenwhoarescientistsandengineersatmajorresearchuniversitieshaveimproved,althoughwomencontinuet
Theprospectsforwomenwhoarescientistsandengineersatmajorresearchuniversitieshaveimproved,althoughwomencontinuet
Theprospectsforwomenwhoarescientistsandengineersatmajorresearchuniversitieshaveimproved,althoughwomencontinuet
Todaywetalkaboutthedifferencebetweenacollegeandauniversity.Collegesanduniversitieshavealotincommon.Theyprep
Todaywetalkaboutthedifferencebetweenacollegeandauniversity.Collegesanduniversitieshavealotincommon.Theyprep
随机试题
患者,男性,25岁。有糖尿病病史5年,胰岛素治疗中断,后出现厌食、恶心、呕吐、口渴、多尿,昏迷入院。查体:血压下降,血糖30.2mmol/L,尿糖(++++),尿酮(++),pH7.25。此例患者昏迷的原因是
中国精品公司与法国让纳公司签订了向中国进口皮具的合同。贸易术语为CFR,让纳公司依合同的规定于2016年5月完成装运并发货。精品公司在目的港接收货物后。经检验发现皮具的质量低于合同规定的要求。依《国际贸易术语解释通则》及《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》的规定
某工程低压厂用变压器为SCB一1250/10,1250kVA,6.3±2×2.510.4kV,Ud=6%,Dyn1。变压器和0.4kV低压成套开关柜通过硬母线直接相连。配电室内环境温度为+40℃,母线水平安装。该工程低压变压器回路持续工作电流为何值?
质点质量m,悬挂质点的弹簧刚度系数k(如图所示),系统作直线自由振动的固有频率w0与周期T的正确表达式为:
下列各项中,一定不会引起现金流量表中现金数额变动的是()。
一个容积为64升的鼓形圆桶上有A,B两孔,一种蒸馏水从A孔流入同时从B孔流出,如果通过A孔的流速为3升/小时,那么当B孔的流速为多少升时才能保证用96小时恰好装满该容器?
①根据专业统计,消费者在每封信件上只会停留短短7秒钟②要想消费者从众多的直邮中拆开你的信件,那你的信封就必须够独特,够有诱惑力③如果将企业的直邮销售看作一个产品,那么信封就是这个产品的包装④如果目标顾客连你的信封都不拆开,就别提直邮营销的成功率⑤目
1928年,蔡元培在南主持召开第一次全国教育会议,通过了()。
讨论函数f(x)=(x>0)的连续性.
A、Sunny.B、Rainy.C、Windy.D、Cloudy.B由“…rainwillspreadfromScotlandtocovermostpartsbymidnight.”可知雨会在午夜从苏格兰蔓延到大部分地区,所以答
最新回复
(
0
)