首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It was 3:45 in the morning when the vote was finally taken. After six months of arguing and a final 16 hours of hot parliamentar
It was 3:45 in the morning when the vote was finally taken. After six months of arguing and a final 16 hours of hot parliamentar
admin
2013-03-08
41
问题
It was 3:45 in the morning when the vote was finally taken. After six months of arguing and a final 16 hours of hot parliamentary debating, Australia’s Northern Territory became the first legal authority in the world to allow doctors to take the lives of incurably ill patients who wish to die. The measure was passed by the convincing vote of 15 to 10. Almost immediately word flashed on the Internet and was picked up, half a world away, by John Hofsess, executive director of the Right to Die Society of Canada. He sent it on via the group’s on-line service,Death NET. Says Hofsess:"We posted bulletins all day long, because of course this isn’t just something that happened in Australia. It’s world history. "
The full import may take a while to sink in. The NT Rights of the Terminally I11 Law has left physicians and citizens alike trying to deal with its moral and practical implications. Some have breathed sighs of relief; others, including churches, right-to-life groups and the Australian Medical Association, bitterly attacked the bill and the haste of its passage. But the tide is unlikely to turn back. In Australia—where an aging population, life-extending technology and changing community attitudes have all played their part. Other states are going to consider making a similar law to deal with euthanasia. In the US and Canada, where the right-to-die movement is gathering strength, observers are waiting for the dominoes to start falling.
Under the new Northern Territory law, an adult patient can request death—probably by a deadly injection or pill—to put an end to suffering. The patient must be diagnosed as terminally ill by two doctors. After a "cooling off" period of seven days, the patient can sign a certificate of request. After 48 hours the wish for death can be met. For Lloyd Nickson, a 54-year-old Darwin resident suffering from lung cancer, the NT Rights of Terminally 111 Law means he can get on with living without the haunting fear of his suffering: a terrifying death from his breathing condition. "I’m not afraid of dying from a spiritual point of view, but what I was afraid of was how I’d go, because I’ve watched people die in the hospital fighting for oxygen and clawing at their masks, "he says.
What is the author’s attitude towards euthanasia? ______
选项
A、Hostile.
B、Suspicious.
C、Approving.
D、Indifferent.
答案
C
解析
主旨态度题。赞成的态度。本文中心议题是讨论安乐死及其所产生的影响。本文最后一段所举例子为判断作者态度提供了明确的依据。在最后一段里,作者通过54岁的肺癌病人Nickson先生的话,实际上对安乐死作了结论:他本人赞成安乐死。以此暗示作者自己的赞同观点。此外,文中对反对安乐死的态度,作者只是轻描淡写,也可以佐证作者倾向。因此,其他选项[A]敌对的;[B]怀疑的;[D]漠不关心,显然都不可取。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ZMxd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Asmartmanoncesaidthattheonlythingnecessaryforthetriumphofevilisforgoodmentodonothing.So,asapolicem
WhySonoraLouiseSmartDoddwantedtocelebrateFather’sday?
Minority-ownedbusinessintheUnitedStateshadunprecedentedopportunitiesaswellasnewandsignificantrisks.Civilrights
Hawaii
Almosteverybodywantstoliveaslongaspossible.Andgiventheenormousstridesmadeinmedicineandthehealthsciencesduri
Peopletravelforalotofreasons.Some-touristsgotoseebattlefieldsofreligiousshrines.Othersarelookingforculture,o
retirement本题考查丢钱事件后对不诚实警察的处理,有些被解雇了,有些被迫提前______,可以推测是退休。
1921本题考查考生对于具体信息的听辨能力。从“BorninNewYorkonMay21,1921,Mr.MigdengraduatedfromColumbiaLawSchoolinl947”可知答案。
Inthepastfewyears,manypeoplecaneasilyrentorevenownaVCRbecauseVCRshavebecome______.
Government答案信息在于第七句:DrKissingerenteredgovernmentserviceinl969。
随机试题
单相桥式整流电路在加入电容滤波后,则()。
Hethinksheissuperior______hisclassmatesbecausehisfatherisanimportantperson.
冠状动脉粥样斑块中不能见到的是下列哪种物质
膝关节损伤不常见的临床表现是
膨润土是一种以蒙脱石为主要矿物成分的黏土岩()。
某设计院指派本院工程师张某为某建设单位设计住宅楼,设计合同中没有约定设计图著作权的归属,该设计图的著作权属于()。
新古典主义艺术家安格尔以表现古典理想美的女人体而著称,《阿尔及利亚女人》《土耳其浴室》是他的代表作品。()
举一个自己工作经历中比较成功的创新事例,并谈谈对创新的理解。
我们说儒家是道德至上或者道德决定论的时候,是一种宏观上的总体定性和评价。所谓“子罕言利”或者“小人喻于利”,是着眼于人作为一种道德存在、超越存在的“应然”特质而立论,所拒斥和鄙夷的只是“不义而富且贵”。具体到关乎民生的问题,儒家并非不言利、否定利,而是主张
Wherewasthemangoing?Whydidhethrowtheappleaway7
最新回复
(
0
)