2. 考研
  3. Come on—everybody’s doing it. That whispered message, half invitation and half forcing, is what most of us thinking of when we h

Come on—everybody’s doing it. That whispered message, half invitation and half forcing, is what most of us thinking of when we h

admin2018-01-08  70
问题    Come on—everybody’s doing it. That whispered message, half invitation and half forcing, is what most of us thinking of when we hear the words peer pressure. It usually leads to no good—drinking, drugs and casual sex. But in her new book Join the Club, Tina Rosenberg contends that peer pressure can also be a positive force through what she calls the social cure, in which organizations and officials use the power of group dynamics to help individuals improve their lives and possibly the world.
   Rosenberg, the recipient of a Pulitzer Prize, offers a host of examples of the social cure in action: In South Carolina, a state-sponsored antismoking program called Rage Against the Haze sets out to make cigarettes uncool. In South Africa, an HIV-prevention initiative known as LoveLife recruits young people to promote safe sex among their peers.
   The idea seems promising, and Rosenberg is a perceptive observer. Her critique of the lameness of many public-health campaigns is spot-on: they fail to mobilize peer pressure for healthy habits, and they demonstrate a seriously flawed understanding of psychology. "Dare to be different, please don’t smoke!" pleads one billboard campaign aimed at reducing smoking among teenagers—teenagers, who desire nothing more than fitting in. Rosenberg argues convincingly that public-health advocates ought to take a page from advertisers, so skilled at applying peer pressure.
   But on the general effectiveness of the social cure, Rosenberg is less persuasive. Join the Club is filled with too much irrelevant detail and not enough exploration of the social and biological factors that make peer pressure so powerful. The most glaring flaw of the social cure as it’s presented here is that it doesn’t work very well for very long. Rage Against the Haze failed once state funding was cut. Evidence that the LoveLife program prodvices lasting changes is limited and mixed.
   There’ s no doubt that our peer groups exert enormous influence on our behavior. An emerging body of research shows that positive health habits—as well as negative ones—spread through networks of friends via social communication. This is a subtle form of peer pressure: we unconsciously imitate the behavior we see every day.
   Far less certain, however, is how successfully experts and bureaucrats can select our peer groups and steer their activities in virtuous directions. It’s like the teacher who breaks up the troublemakers in the back row by pairing them with better-behaved classmates. The tactic never really works. And that’s the problem with a social cure engineered from the outside: in the real world, as in school, we insist on choosing our own friends.
In the author’s view, Rosenberg’s book fails to______.
选项 A、effectively evade the flaws of the social cure
B、adequately probe social and biological factors
C、produce a long-lasting social effect
D、illustrate the functions of state funding
答案B
解析 此题为细节分析题。根据题干关键词Rosenberg’s book和fails可定位答案至第四段前两句。指出：关于社会疗法的总体效果，Rosenher’g的观点就不是很有说服力了，《加入俱乐部》中充斥着大量无关紧要的细节，并且对造成同侪压力如此大影响的社会和生物因素没有给与足够的探究。因此，B选项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ZUBZ777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)