首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
admin
2009-03-16
22
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing bard to win, Challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key Witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge play a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" — especially a religious event — was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of its is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the USA has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witnesses beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
选项
A、the British legal system can do the basic job well — convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent
B、the British legal system is worse than the continental legal system
C、the British legal system is often considered to be not very fair
D、tbe British legal system is very efficient
答案
C
解析
句意推测题。由句中game(游戏)与a serious attempt to do justice(实现正义的严肃尝试)之间的对比关系及这一段后文对于英国审判过程的描述可以推知[C]对。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ZVPd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Allinternationalchainschoolsteachmanydifferentlanguages.
Insuranceissupposedtoprovideprotectionagainstfinancialrisks,andwhiledyingtoosoonisonemajorriskweface,another
Supermarketshoppershaveneverbeenmorespoiltforchoice.Butjustwhenwethoughttraditionalsystemsofselectivefarmingh
"Themoregadgetsthereare,the【31】______thingsseemtoget."saidHonoreErvin,co-authorofTheEtiquetteGirls:ThingsYou
"Themoregadgetsthereare,the【31】______thingsseemtoget."saidHonoreErvin,co-authorofTheEtiquetteGirls:ThingsYou
Opinionpollsarenowbeginningtoshowthat,whoeveristoblameandwhateverhappensfromnowon,highunemploymentisprobabl
Throughoutourcountry,moreandmoreprivateschoolsaresetup.Somepeopledoubtabouttheeffectivenessoftheseprivatesch
Mostpeopleareright-handedandchildrenusuallyhavethesamehandednessastheirparents.Thissuggeststhatgenesareatwor
In1959theaverageAmericanfamilypaid$989forayear’ssupplyoffood.In1972thefamilypaid$1,311.Thatwasaprice
Inathree-monthperiodlastyear,twoBrooklyniteshadtobecutoutoftheirapartmentsandcarriedtohospitalonstretchers
随机试题
认为领导并不一定完全是上下级之间的命令与服从关系,下级也可能有领导上级的机会,这种观点属于一般行为领导理论中的()
系统分析中规范研究主要应用的方法是【】
A.乙状结肠和直肠B.回肠C.结肠特别是乙状结肠D.回盲部伤寒常累及
A.周围血嗜酸粒细胞增多B.周围血中性粒细胞增多C.周围血中性粒细胞减少D.周围血浆细胞增多>2.0×109/LE.骨髓粒系各阶段细胞均见增多,以中幼粒、晚幼粒细胞增多为主
甲为乙企业设立的分支机构,甲在经营活动过程中与丙企业签订货物运输合同,后甲分支机构在运输货物的过程中因重大过失造成大量货物毁损,给丙企业带来巨大经济损失,现丙企业欲向法院提起诉讼要求获得相应赔偿。则关于本案的被告,下列说法中正确的是:(
黄某采用住房抵押贷款方式购买了一套总价30万元的房子,贷款20万元,年期20年,抵押贷款月还款系数为0.006924。黄先生住了2年后,想将房子租出,于是委托A中介公司的经纪人小张代为招租,在未租出前房屋仍由黄先生管理。其中小张通过各种方法推出黄先生的房源
消防安全对策、措施及建议的内容应具有()。
下列选项中属于承揽合同的是()
A、She’stoobusytorunforclasspresident.B、Shehasn’tconsideredrunningforclasspresident.C、Sheplanstoapplyforapar
Thephrase"progressiveeducation"isone,ifnotprotest,atleastofcontrast,ofcontrastwithaneducationwhichwaspredomi
最新回复
(
0
)