首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Touch-Screen Generation A)On a chilly day last spring, a few dozen developers of children’s apps(应用程序)for phones and tablets
The Touch-Screen Generation A)On a chilly day last spring, a few dozen developers of children’s apps(应用程序)for phones and tablets
admin
2014-08-25
28
问题
The Touch-Screen Generation
A)On a chilly day last spring, a few dozen developers of children’s apps(应用程序)for phones and tablets(平板电脑)gathered at an old beach resort in Monterey, California, to show off their games. The gathering was organized by Warren Buckleitner, a longtime reviewer of interactive children’s media. Buckleitner spent the breaks testing whether his own remote-control helicopter could reach the hall’s second story, while various children who had come with their parents looked up in awe(敬畏)and delight. But mostly they looked down, at the iPads and other tablets displayed around the hall like so many open boxes of candy. I walked around and talked with developers, and several quoted a famous saying of Maria Montessori’s, " The hands are the instruments of man’s intelligence. "
B)What, really, would Maria Montessori have made of this scene? The 30 or so children here were not down at the shore poking(戳)their fingers in the sand or running them along stones or picking seashells. Instead they were all inside, alone or in groups of two or three, their faces a few inches from a screen, their hands doing things Montessori surely did not imagine.
C)In 2011, the American Academy of Pediatrics updated its policy on very young children and media. In 1999, the group had discouraged television viewing for children younger than 2, citing research on brain development that showed this age group’s critical need for " direct interactions with parents and other significant care givers. " The updated report began by acknowledging that things had changed significantly since then. In 2006, 90% of parents said that their children younger than 2 consumed some form of electronic media. Nevertheless, the group took largely the same approach it did in 1999, uniformly discouraging passive media use, on any type of screen, for these kids.(For older children, the academy noted, " high-quality programs" could have " educational benefits. ")The 2011 report mentioned "smart cell phone" and "new screen" technologies, but did not address interactive apps. Nor did it bring up the possibility that has likely occurred to those 90% of American parents that some good might come from those little swiping(在电子产品上刷)fingers.
D)I had come to the developers’ conference partly because I hoped that this particular set of parents, enthusiastic as they were about interactive media, might help me out of this problem, that they might offer some guiding principle for American parents who are clearly never going to meet the academy’s ideals, and at some level do not want to. Perhaps this group would be able to express clearly some benefits of the new technology that the more cautious doctors weren’t ready to address.
E)I fell into conversation with a woman who had helped develop Montessori Letter Sounds, an app that teaches preschoolers the Montessori methods of spelling. She was a former Montessori teacher and a mother of four. I myself have three children who are all fans of the touch screen. What games did her kids like to play, I asked, hoping for suggestions I could take home.
"They don’t play all that much. "
Really? Why not?
"Because I don’t allow it. We have a rule of no screen time during the week, unless it’s clearly
educational. "
No screen time? None at all? That seems at the outer edge of restrictive, even by the standards of
overcontrolling parents.
" On the weekends, they can play. I give them a limit of half an hour and then stop. Enough. "
F)Her answer so surprised me that I decided to ask some of the other developers who were also parents what their domestic ground rules for screen time were. One said only on airplanes and long car rides. Another said Wednesdays and weekends, for half an hour. The most permissive said half an hour a day, which was about my rule at home. At one point I sat with one of the biggest developers of e-book apps for kids, and his family. The small kid was starting to fuss in her high chair, so the mom stuck an iPad in front of her and played a short movie so everyone else could enjoy their lunch. When she saw me watching, she gave me the universal tense look of mothers who feel they are being judged. "At home," she assured me, "I only let her watch movies in Spanish. "
G)By their reactions, these parents made me understand the problem of our age: as technology becomes almost everywhere in our lives, American parents are becoming more, not less, distrustful of what it might be doing to their children. Technological ability has not, for parents, translated into comfort and ease. On the one hand, parents want their children to swim expertly in the digital stream that they will have to navigate(航行)all their lives; on the other hand, they fear that too much digital media, too early, will sink them. Parents end up treating tablets as precision surgical(外科的)instruments, devices that might perform miracles for their child’s IQ and help him win some great robotics competition—but only if they are used just so. Otherwise, their child could end up one of those sad, pale creatures who can’t make eye contact and has a girlfriend who lives only in the virtual world.
H)Norman Rockwell, a 20th-century artist, never painted Boy Swiping Finger on Screen, and our own vision of a perfect childhood has never been adjusted to accommodate that now-common scene. Add to that our modern fear that every parenting decision may have lasting consequences—that every minute of enrichment lost or mindless entertainment indulged(放纵的)will add up to some permanent handicap(障碍)in the future—and you have deep guilt and confusion. To date, no body of research has proved that the iPad will make your preschooler smarter or teach her to speak Chinese, or alternatively that it will rust her nervous system—the device has been out for only three years, not much more than the time it takes some academics to find funding and gather research subjects. So what is a parent to do?
American parents are becoming more doubtful about the benefits technology is said to bring to their children.
选项
答案
G
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ZWv7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、Thecinemaissomedistanceawayfromwheretheyare.B、Hewouldliketoreadthefilmreviewinthenewspaper.C、Theyshould
WeShouldHaveaGratefulHeart1.现在,有些人,尤其是年轻人,对外面的世界漠不关心2.导致这种现象的原因3.心怀感恩,我们的生活会更美好
Modernmass-productionmethodslowerthecostofmakinggoods,andthusgiveusbettervalues.Atthesametime,Americaningenu
Allaroundtheworldmillionsofpeopleareeagerlywaitingforthe16thofJuly.That’sbecauseitisthedaywhenthesixthHa
A、Tomakeuseofhiscar.B、Tocollectmoremoney.C、Toshowherinterestinhim.D、Toenlargetheteam.A
A、Tointroducehimtoawritersgroup.B、Toinformabouttheclassmeeting.C、Torecommendhimanewbook.D、Toaskhimabouthi
BloodDonation:aLife-SavingCauseA)Chinaenshrinedthepracticeofvoluntary,non-remuneratedblooddonationsintolawwitht
A、Buythewatchfor$20.B、SeeBonniethisweekend.C、Borrowsomemoneyfromthewoman.D、AskBonnietopaybackthemoney.C行动
Amidasummerofrecord-settingheat,anewsurveyfindsthatmostofGenerationX’s(20世纪60年代到70年代初出生的美国人)youngandmiddle-agea
随机试题
溶血性链球菌属的形态特征是()。
求方程y"-2y’+5y=ex的通解.
AlthoughtheUnitedStatescherishesthetraditionthatitisanationofsmalltownsandwideopenspaces,onlyoneineveryei
严寒地区处于水位升降范围内的混凝土,不宜选用的水泥品种有()。
阅读文言文,完成以下题目。首饰
拘传适用的条件是()。
下列哪项职权不是全国人大常委会的职权?()
散文家:智慧与聪明是令人渴望的品质。但是,一个人聪明并不意味着他很有智慧,而一个人有智慧也不意味着他很聪明。在我所遇到的人中,有的人聪明,有的人有智慧,但是,却没有人同时具备这两种品质。根据上述散文家的观点可以推出下列哪项?
1988年北美的干旱可能是由太平洋地区温度模式的变化导致的,因此,干旱不是由二氧化碳等大气污染引起的正在发生的长期全球变暖趋势所导致的。下面哪一项如果正确,对上文论述提出最好的批评?
AttemptsatDeterminingEarth’sAgeP1:Sincethedawnofcivilization,peoplehavebeencuriousabouttheageofEarth.What’s
最新回复
(
0
)