首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It came as something of a surprise when Diana, Princess of Wales, made a trip to Angola in 1997, to support the Red Cross’s camp
It came as something of a surprise when Diana, Princess of Wales, made a trip to Angola in 1997, to support the Red Cross’s camp
admin
2011-01-05
79
问题
It came as something of a surprise when Diana, Princess of Wales, made a trip to Angola in 1997, to support the Red Cross’s campaign for a total ban on all anti-personnel landmines. Within hours of arriving in Angola, television screens around the world were filled with images of her comforting victims injured in explosions caused by landmines. "I knew the statistics," she said, "But putting a face to those figures brought the reality home to me: like when I met Sandra, a 13-year-old girl who had lost her leg, and people like her. "
The Princess concluded with a simple message: "We must stop landmines. " And she used every opportunity during her visit to repeat this message.
But, back in London, her views were not shared by some members of the British government, which refused to support a ban on these weapons. Angry politicians launched an attack on the Princess in the press. They described her as "very ill-informed" and a "loose cannon" (乱放炮的人).
The Princess responded by brushing aside the criticisms: "This is a distraction (干扰) we do not need. All I’m trying to do is help. "
Opposition parties, the media and the public immediately voiced their support for the Princess. To make matters worse for the government, it soon emerged that the Princess’s trip had been approved by the Foreign Office, and that she was in fact very well-informed about both the situation in Angola and the British government’s policy regarding landmines. The result was a severe embarrassment for the government.
To try and limit the damage, the Foreign Secretary, Malcolm Rifkind, claimed that the Princess’s views on landmines were not very different from government policy, and that it was "working towards" a worldwide ban. The Defense Secretary, Michael Portillo, claimed the matter was "a misinterpretation or misunderstanding. "
For the Princess, the trip to this war torn country was an excellent opportunity to use her ,popularity to show the world how much destruction and suffering landmines can cause. She said that the experience had also given her the chance to get closer to people and their problems.
How did Diana respond to the criticisms?
选项
A、She made more appearances on TV.
B、She paid no attention to them.
C、She met the 13-year-old girl as planned.
D、She launched an attack on the members of the British government.
答案
B
解析
细节题。文章第四段首句,王妃对那些批评不予理睬。B项与文章内容完全吻合,故B为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ZYmd777K
本试题收录于:
职称英语卫生类A级题库职称英语分类
0
职称英语卫生类A级
职称英语
相关试题推荐
ANEWCRUISESHIPOneofthebiggestpassengershipsinhistory,theIslandPrincess,carriespeopleoncruisesaroundtheCa
ANEWCRUISESHIPOneofthebiggestpassengershipsinhistory,theIslandPrincess,carriespeopleoncruisesaroundtheCa
ANEWCRUISESHIPOneofthebiggestpassengershipsinhistory,theIslandPrincess,carriespeopleoncruisesaroundtheCa
ANEWCRUISESHIPOneofthebiggestpassengershipsinhistory,theIslandPrincess,carriespeopleoncruisesaroundtheCa
ANEWCRUISESHIPOneofthebiggestpassengershipsinhistory,theIslandPrincess,carriespeopleoncruisesaroundtheCa
Theexaminerasksyoutotalkaboutsomethingtogetherandgivesyouadrawingtohelpyou.
Theexaminerasksyoutotalkaboutsomethingtogetherandgivesyouadrawingtohelpyou.
Theexaminerasksyoutotalkaboutsomethingtogetherandgivesyouadrawingtohelpyou.
Hisgreatchangessurprisedus.
随机试题
为了保障会计人员能够顺利地履行自己的职责,国家对他们赋予了必要的工作权限,主要包括哪些方面?
测定饮片含水量的方法不能用()
A.摘要B.前言C.结果D.讨论E.材料与方法“是否基于试验结果”是评价
散水一般绘制在()上。
A钢铁集团有限公司成立于2000年3月14日,法定代表人为吕某,企业性质为民营有限公司。集团公司下设焦化厂、炼铁厂、炼钢厂、烧结厂、球团厂、制氧厂、发电厂等生产单位。2016年12月24日起集团公司全面停产检修,停产前在职职工816人。2017年1月2日
20世纪70年代,美国芝加哥大学的教授尤金.法玛决定为市场有效性建立一套标准,法玛把信息划分为()。Ⅰ.历史信息Ⅱ.公开有效信息Ⅲ.内部信息Ⅳ.投资者信息
下列各项中,体现了可理解性要求的有()。
以下利息收入,免征增值税的有()。
Scottishislandisnowawindsweptislandboastingpinemartens,reddeerandpuffins.But170millionyearsago,someverydiff
[2007年GRK真题]夜晚点燃艾叶驱蚊曾是龙泉山区引起家庭火灾的重要原因。近年来,尽管使用艾叶驱蚊的人家显著减少,但是,家庭火灾所导致的死亡人数并没有呈现减少的趋势。以下各项如果为真,能够解释上述情况,除了:
最新回复
(
0
)