首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2017-11-28
37
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate — or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very long wave lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible , but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic — or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the government, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The viewpoint of the EPA is______.
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer
B、electricity really affects cancer
C、electromagnetic fields with long wave lengths are safe
D、low-frequency electromagnetic fields are a possible cause of cancer
答案
A
解析
事实细节题。第二段第三句指出,环境保护局(EPA)目前的结论是,科学证据表明,极低频电磁场(即那些具有长波的电磁场)和白血病、淋巴瘤及脑癌之间有着难以确定的联系,故答案为[A]项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Zaua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
()referstothestudyofsocialaspectsoflanguageanditsrelationwithsociety.
Althoughanydestructionofvitaminscausedbyfoodirradiationcouldbe______theuseofdietsupplements,theremaybenopro
AimlessnesshashardlybeentypicalofthepostwarJapanwhoseproductivityandsocialharmonyaretheenvyoftheUnitedSta
Inthenextfewweeksconsumerspendingwillincreaseby7%inAmerica,______withlastyear,accordingtoaconsumersurveyby
Wedidholdameetingyesterday,butyou______,sowedidnotinformyou.
We______theletteryesterday,butitdidn’tarrive.
Foreachquestionbelow,choosetheanswerthatbestcompletesthesentence.ThenwritethecorrespondingletterontheAnswerS
Foreachquestionbelow,choosetheanswerthatbestcompletesthesentence.ThenwritethecorrespondingletterontheAnswerS
Environmentalprotectionisavitaljobwehavetoundertake,fordamagetotheearthis______.
随机试题
患者,男性,50岁。高血压病史15年.未坚持服药。2小时前因情绪激动突然意识不清,双侧瞳孔不等大。应首先考虑的是()
“他从什么地方来啊?”中的“啊”应读()。
我国公司法规定,总经理行使的主要职权有
腹部闭合性损伤的常见原因中,下列哪项是错误的
吊装方案编制的主要依据有()。
行政法规的制定部门是()。
"Opinion"isawordthatisusedcarelesslytoday.Itisusedtorefertomattersoftaste,belief,andjudgment.Thiscasualus
设函数f(x)连续,且f’(0)>0,则存在δ>0,使得()
下列反常积分发散的是
Twoofthemostcommonrumorsaboutimmigrantfamiliesarethattheydon’treallywanttobecomeAmericanandthatthey’readra
最新回复
(
0
)