首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2017-11-28
39
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate — or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very long wave lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible , but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic — or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the government, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The viewpoint of the EPA is______.
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer
B、electricity really affects cancer
C、electromagnetic fields with long wave lengths are safe
D、low-frequency electromagnetic fields are a possible cause of cancer
答案
A
解析
事实细节题。第二段第三句指出,环境保护局(EPA)目前的结论是,科学证据表明,极低频电磁场(即那些具有长波的电磁场)和白血病、淋巴瘤及脑癌之间有着难以确定的联系,故答案为[A]项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Zaua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
高新技术产品
electricvehicle
()referstothestudyofsocialaspectsoflanguageanditsrelationwithsociety.
The______companyhasanexcellentreputation-whichisunderstandable,sinceit’sbeeninbusinessfortwentyyearsandhastho
Ingeneral,oursocietyisbecomingoneofgiantenterprisesdirectedbyabureaucraticmanagementinwhichmanbecomesasmall,
Wedidholdameetingyesterday,butyou______,sowedidnotinformyou.
Thecontemporarybotanicalgardenhasmanyurgenttasks,theconservationofplantresourcesbeingparamount.
JPMorganthenfollowedupwithaletterseekingassurancesthatalltransfersweredone______applicablerulesandregulations.
Foreachquestionbelow,choosetheanswerthatbestcompletesthesentence.ThenwritethecorrespondingletterontheAnswerS
Thesun,rain,andfrosthaddamagedthe________wallofthisoldbuilding.
随机试题
简述第二审刑事判决书尾部的内容及写作方法。
哪种H2受体拮抗剂的作用强而持久且副作用少
A.内标法B.外标法C.主成分自身对照法D.标准加入法E.面积归—化法在高效液相色谱的测定方法中,公式适用的方法是()。
公序良俗原则[山东大学2015年研;湘潭大学2015年研]
邓丁与乡政府签订一份海湾养殖承包合同,将月亮湾承包给邓丁经营5年。后某市政府发出通知,要求邓丁等人依法办理确权手续,并领取海域使用权证书。邓丁以自己与乡政府签有承包合同为由拒不办理。市海洋行政主管部门通知乡政府处理此事。乡政府得知后转交乡治安联防队处理,乡
融资租赁的租金包括()等部分。
假设我国某银行由于资本充足率严重低下,不良资产大量增加,存款人大量挤提银行存款,财务状况严重恶化,自身求助能力有限,终于走向倒闭。根据以上材料,回答下列问题:银行监管的内容主要包括()。
【2015年山东省属真题】社会是变化发展的,德育不能仅传授给学生固定的价值观点,要教会学生如何分析不同的道德价值,这反映的德育模式是()。
从表面上看,动物的某些活动与人的活动具有很大的相似之处:人会榨糖,蜜蜂会酿蜜:人会织布,蜘蛛会结网;人会筑房,鸟儿会筑巢;人会收获,蚂蚁会往窝里搬食……由此而得出的正确的结论及其推论是
TheWriterisa______.Howlongdidn’ttheWriterMakeaphonetoherhome?
最新回复
(
0
)