首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2017-11-28
49
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate — or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very long wave lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible , but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic — or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the government, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The viewpoint of the EPA is______.
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer
B、electricity really affects cancer
C、electromagnetic fields with long wave lengths are safe
D、low-frequency electromagnetic fields are a possible cause of cancer
答案
A
解析
事实细节题。第二段第三句指出,环境保护局(EPA)目前的结论是,科学证据表明,极低频电磁场(即那些具有长波的电磁场)和白血病、淋巴瘤及脑癌之间有着难以确定的联系,故答案为[A]项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Zaua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
consumergoods
EventhoughformidablewintersarethenormintheDakotas,manypeoplewereunpreparedforthe______oftheblizzardof1888.
EventhoughthefolktalesPerroultcollectedandretoldwerenotsolelyFrenchinorigin,hisversionsofthemweresodecidedly
Theincreaseinleisuretime,thehigherstandardofliving,theavailabilityofcarstoawiderrangeofthepopulationand,pe
Somefishhaveagreater______foracidwaterthanothers.
AimlessnesshashardlybeentypicalofthepostwarJapanwhoseproductivityandsocialharmonyaretheenvyoftheUnitedSta
AimlessnesshashardlybeentypicalofthepostwarJapanwhoseproductivityandsocialharmonyaretheenvyoftheUnitedSta
"Hashegainedweight?""Hewouldgainweight,buthe______much."
Theproliferationofweaponsofmassdestructionwillnotbestoppedby______,norwillterrorismbeendedbytheincarceration
随机试题
A.假药B.药品C.劣药D.辅料用于预防、治疗、诊断人的疾病,有目的地调节人的生理机能并规定有适应证或者功能主治、用法和用量的物质是
关于贿赂犯罪,下列哪些选项是错误的?(2010年卷二65题)
由私营企业进行项目的建设与运营,从政府方或接受服务方收取费用以回收成本,这种融资方式称为( )。
保管统计资料的范围应包括政府统计工作中所形成的所有统计资料。()
我国是国际标准化组织成员。政府应该鼓励农产品生产、加工企业和学术团体积极参加国际标准化活动,从中获取发达国家大公司的标准信息,了解他们的技术动态和运作决窍,并争取使国内的意见和建议能为即将制定或修订的国际标准所采纳。这对减少技术性贸易壁垒影响,是十分有利的
茶在百姓日常生活中是_________之物,开门七件事“柴米油盐酱醋茶”,就有一个“茶”字。与茶结缘,可以使平居岁月增添几_________。如何得结茶缘,全看个人的造化与悟性。填入划横线部分最恰当的一项是:
估计信度的方法一般有()
执行下列逻辑或运算0101010010010011,其运算结果是______。
Readthearticlebelowaboutmarketingpartnerships.Choosethebestsentencefromtheoppositepagetofilleachofthegaps.F
Welovewhatwecandowithourcomputers,yetwhenitcomestoreading,giventhechoice,mostpeoplepreferprintingtheirmat
最新回复
(
0
)