首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2017-11-28
69
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate — or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very long wave lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible , but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic — or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the government, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The viewpoint of the EPA is______.
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer
B、electricity really affects cancer
C、electromagnetic fields with long wave lengths are safe
D、low-frequency electromagnetic fields are a possible cause of cancer
答案
A
解析
事实细节题。第二段第三句指出,环境保护局(EPA)目前的结论是,科学证据表明,极低频电磁场(即那些具有长波的电磁场)和白血病、淋巴瘤及脑癌之间有着难以确定的联系,故答案为[A]项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Zaua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
非营利性组织
consumergoods
Urgentactionisneededincountriesimpactedbyfragility,conflictandviolence(FCV)toendextremepovertyglobally,accordi
EventhoughformidablewintersarethenormintheDakotas,manypeoplewereunpreparedforthe______oftheblizzardof1888.
AlthoughSimpsonwasingeniousat______toappearinnovativeandspontaneous,beneaththeruseheremaineduninspiredandrigid
Thisyearsometwenty-threehundredteenagersfromallovertheworldwillspendabouttenmonthsinU.S.homes.Theywillatte
AimlessnesshashardlybeentypicalofthepostwarJapanwhoseproductivityandsocialharmonyaretheenvyoftheUnitedSta
Inthe1960s,medicalresearchersThomasHolmesandRichardRahedevelopedachecklistofstressfulevents.Theyappreciatedthe
Thisisnotagoodtimetobeforeign.Anti-immigrantpartiesaregaininggroundinEurope.Britainhasbeenfrettingthisweek
ForalltheirContinental______,Europeanscanberemarkablylaxaboute-mailsecurity.
随机试题
下列关于欧洲联盟的表述中,不正确的是()。
A、ANewYorkexecutive.B、Aphysician.C、Atelevisionannouncer.D、Ateacher.D从“Ithinktheprogramwillbeveryhelpfulwitht
血标本溶血对其准确性影响最大的检验项目是( )。
扶病人翻身侧卧的目的是()。
患者,男,37岁。有饮酒史。脘腹胀闷作痛,吐血紫黯,夹有食物残渣,口苦口臭,尿黄便秘,舌红苔黄腻,脉滑数。诊为吐血,其证候是
A.正虚瘀结之积证B.气滞血阻之积证C.瘀血内结之积证D.食滞痰阻之聚证E.肝气郁结之聚证腹胀或痛,腹部时有条索状物聚起,按之胀痛更甚,便秘,纳呆,舌苔腻,脉弦滑。证属
下列各项中,属于风险评估阶段审计项目组内部讨论的内容的有()。
银行存款余额调节表是调整企业银行存款账面余额的原始凭证。()
劳斯莱斯作为“皇家贵族的坐骑”,就是将()作为品牌的核心竞争力。
EdgarPoe,anAmericanwriter,wasbornin1809.Hisparentswereactors.Edgarwasababywhenhisfatherleftthefamily.Hew
最新回复
(
0
)