首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The End of AIDS? [A] On June 5th 1981 America’s Centres for Disease Control and Prevention reported the outbreak of an unusual f
The End of AIDS? [A] On June 5th 1981 America’s Centres for Disease Control and Prevention reported the outbreak of an unusual f
admin
2017-12-08
32
问题
The End of AIDS?
[A] On June 5th 1981 America’s Centres for Disease Control and Prevention reported the outbreak of an unusual form of pneumonia (肺炎) in Los Angeles. When, a few weeks later, its scientists noticed a similar cluster of a rare cancer called Kaposi’s sarcoma (肉瘤) in San Francisco, they suspected that something strange and serious was coming. That something was AIDS.
[B] Since then, 25m people have died from AIDS and another 34m are infected. The 30th anniversary of the disease’s discovery has been taken by many as an occasion for hand-wringing. Yet the war on AIDS is going far better than anyone dared hope. A decade ago, half of the people in several southern African countries were expected to die of AIDS. Now, the death rate is dropping. In 2005 the disease killed 2.1m people. In 2009, the most recent year for which data are available, the number was 1.8m. Some 5m lives have already been saved by drug treatment. In 33 of the worst-affected countries the rate of new infections is down by 25% or more from its peak.
[C] Even more hopeful is a recent study which suggests that the drugs used to treat AIDS may also stop its transmission. If that proves true, the drugs could acliieve much of what a vaccine (疫苗) would. The question for the world will no longer be whether it can wipe out the plague, but whether it is prepared to pay the price.
The appliance of science
[D] If AIDS is defeated, it will be thanks to an alliance of science, activism and unselfishness. The science has come from the world’s drug companies, which leapt on the problem. In 1996 a batch of similar drugs, all of them inhibiting the activity of one of the AIDS virus’s crucial enzymes (霉素), appeared almost simultaneously. The effect was miraculous, if you (or your government) could afford the $15,000 a year that those drugs cost when they first came on the market.
[E] Much of the activism came from rich-world gays. Having persuaded drug companies into creating the new medicines, the activists bullied them into dropping the price. That would have happened anyway, but activism made it happen faster. The unselfishness was aroused as it became clear by the mid-1990s that AIDS was not just a rich-world disease. Three-quarters of those affected were—and still are—in Africa. Unlike most infections, which strike children and the elderly, AIDS hits the most productive members of society: businessmen, civil servants, engineers, teachers, doctors, nurses. Thanks to an enormous effort by Western philanthropists (慈善家) and some politicians (this is one area where even the left should give credit to George Bush junior), a series of programmes has brought drugs to those infected.
[F] The result is unsatisfactory. Not enough people—some 6.6m of the 16m who would most quickly benefit—are getting the drugs. And the pills are not a cure. Stop taking them, and the virus bounces back. But it is a huge step forward from ten years ago.
[G] What can science offer now? A few people’s immune systems control the disease naturally, which suggests a vaccine might be possible, and antibodies have been discovered that neutralise the virus and might thus form the basis of AIDS-clearing drugs. But a cure still seems a long way off. Prevention is, for the moment, the better bet.
A question of money
[H] In the early days scientists were often attacked by activists for being more concerned with trying to prevent the epidemic spreading than treating the affected. Now it seems that treatment and prevention will come in the same pill. If you can stop the virus reproducing in someone’s body, you not only save his life, you also reduce the number of viruses for him to pass on. Get enough people on drugs and it would be like vaccinating them: the chain of transmission would be broken.
[I] That is a huge task. It is not just a matter of bringing in those who should already be on the drugs (the 16m who show symptoms or whose immune systems are critically weak). To prevent transmission, treatment would in theory need to be expanded to all the 34m people infected with the disease. That would mean more effective screening, which is planned already, and also a willingness by those without the symptoms to be treated. That willingness might be there, though, if it would protect people’s uninfected lovers.
[J] Such a programme would take years and also cost a lot of money. About $16 billion a year is spent on AIDS in poor and middle-income countries. Half is generated locally and half is foreign aid. A report in this week’s Lancet suggests a carefully crafted mixture of approaches that does not involve treating all those without symptoms would bring great benefit for not much more than this—a peak of $22 billion in 2015, and a fall thereafter. Moreover, most of the extra spending would be offset by savings on the treatment of those who would have been infected, but were not—some 12m people, if the scientists have done their sums right. At $500 per person per year, the benefits would far outweigh the costs in purely economic terms: though donors will need to compare the gain from spending more on knocking out AIDS against other worthy causes, such as eliminating malaria (疟疾).
[K] For the moment, the struggle is to stop some rich countries giving less. The Netherlands and Spain are cutting their contributions to the Global Fund, one of the two main distributors of the life-saving drugs, and Italy has stopped paying altogether. On June 8th the United Nations meets to discuss what to do next. Those who see the UN as a mere talking-shop should remember that its first meeting on AIDS launched the Global Fund. It is still a long haul. But AIDS can be beaten. A plague that 30 years ago was blamed on man’s wickedness has ended up showing him in a better, more inventive and generous light.
If the anti-AIDS drugs can stop AIDS from transmitting, the wipe-out of the plague will be out of question.
选项
答案
C
解析
本题既包含关于抗艾研究的进展情况,也含有对抗艾未来发展的展望,根据stop…from transmitting,wipe-out of the plague可定位至C段。C段第1句提到治疗艾滋病的药物有望阻止艾滋病的传播,第2句又接着说如果这是真的话,那么这一药物就几乎能够达到疫苗的效果,第3句接着说wipe out the plague,也就是说可以彻底根除疫情,本题是对C段的概括总结。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Zja7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledItIsMeaningfultoLearnfromPastMistakesbycommen
A、Shewasdoinghousework.B、ShewasreadingJaneEyre.C、Shewasabsorbedinamovie.D、Shewastalkingwithhersisters.B男士说R
TheUnitedStatesofAmericaisoftenseenasanationinwhichthepursuitofhappinessisnotadreambutareality.Thesadt
Overthepastdecade,Americancompanieshavetriedhardtofindwaystodiscourageseniorfromfeatheringtheirownnestsatth
A、Theyarediscussingwheretoputthefurniture.B、Theyarecomplainingaboutrunningoutofhotwater.C、Theyareplanningto
A、Mostofthepeoplewanttodomeaningfulwork.B、Amajorityofworkersaredoingmeaningfulwork.C、Happyworkerscanalwaysf
A、AttendingDr.Alberti’slecture.B、Sharingone’sfeelingwithothers.C、Talkingwithasuperior.D、Chattingwithotherpeople.
It’snosecretthatmanychildrenwouldbehealthierandhappierwithadoptiveparentsthanwiththeparentsthatnaturedealtt
It’snosecretthatmanychildrenwouldbehealthierandhappierwithadoptiveparentsthanwiththeparentsthatnaturedealtt
随机试题
10岁女孩,高热10小时伴头痛、呕吐。体检:T39.2℃,BP60/30mmHg,精神萎靡,颈无抵抗,全身可见大量瘀点、瘀斑。化验:血WBC28×109/L,N90%,脑脊液检查:颅压200mmH2O,WBCl5×106/L,蛋白、糖及氯化物正常该患者
免疫球蛋白()
血瘀腰痛可选用中风气虚血瘀证可选用
图2-12所示一单杆活塞液压缸的活塞直径D=0.25m,活塞杆直径d=0.18m,要求活塞杆伸出的理论速度ν1=2m/min,求:(1)进入液压缸无杆腔的流量。(2)根据求出的流量计算出活塞杆的回程运动速度。
以下属于销售与收款循环涉及的主要业务活动有()。Ⅰ.接受客户订单Ⅱ.按销售单供货Ⅲ.验收商品Ⅳ.向客户开具账单
下列属于存托凭证对投资者的优点的有()。①以美元交易,且通过投资者熟悉的美国清算公司进行结算②上市交易的ADR须经SEC注册,有助于保障投资者权益③上市公司发放股利时,ADR投资者能及时获得,而且是以美元支付④某些机构投资者受投
北宋的方仲永幼年时聪慧异常,成年后泯泯众生。根据心理学家卡特尔的智力形态论,以下分析正确的是()。
(2011年江苏.A类.材料四)根据以下资料,回答下列问题。2009年12月一2010年10月入境旅游外汇收入月增长额最多的是()。
选中“2006年最新排名显示”,将所选文字颜色设置为红色,并为其添加下划线。
Itseemsthatthereisnomiddlegroundwhenitcomestocats.Peopleeitherlovethemorhatethem.Thesefeelingsarenotnew
最新回复
(
0
)