首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2016-12-06
61
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
The following aroused public resentment EXCEPT ______.
选项
A、political power
B、high fares
C、economic loss
D、indifference
答案
C
解析
本题的相关信息在最后一段。A、B、D都被提到,只有C的内容未被提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/aCJK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Heistooshytoaskastrangerthetime,______speaktoaroomfullofpeople.
Asthedirectorcan’tcometothereception,I’mrepresentingthecompany______.
Veryfewpeoplecouldunderstandthelecturetheprofessordeliveredbecauseitssubjectwasvery______.
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
His______ingamblinghaseventuallybroughtabouthisruin.
Acompanyhaslaunchedrevolutionarysoftwarefortrackingstolenmobilephonesthatisimpossibletoremovefromthedevice—eve
Acompanyhaslaunchedrevolutionarysoftwarefortrackingstolenmobilephonesthatisimpossibletoremovefromthedevice—eve
随机试题
A.阻塞性肺气肿B.老年性肺气肿C.代偿性肺气肿D.间质性肺气肿E.灶性肺气肿
A、双解磷B、亚硝酸钠C、盐酸烯丙吗啡D、谷胱甘肽E、乙酰胺主要用于丙烯腈、氟化物、一氧化碳等中毒的解毒剂是
消防工程验收前,施工单位应提交的资料不包括()。
活期存款的起存金额是( )。
年度终了,事业单位对本年度财政直接支付预算指标数与当年财政直接支付实际支出数的差额,不做处理。()
下列有关市价比率的说法中,不正确的有()。
2001年,农夫山泉和北京申奥委联合推出“一分钱”行动,宣传口号是“再小的力量也是一种支持。从现在起,买一瓶农夫山泉,您就为水源地的贫困孩子捐助了一分钱”,“饮水思源,农夫山泉”,提倡“聚沙成塔”的理念。配套广告在中央电视台播放,体育明星刘璇、孔令辉等人出
《中华人民共和国教育法》属于教育法律规范的共同法源。()
确定企业主题数据库是战略数据规划的重要内容之一,主题数据库的概念与BSP方法中的哪个概念是相当的?
Conservationistsmaybemiscalculatingthenumbersofthethreatenedanimalssuchaselephants,sayAfricanandAmericanrese
最新回复
(
0
)