首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Bird Flu: Communicating the Risk The recommendations listed below are grounded in two convictions(信念): that motivating peopl
Bird Flu: Communicating the Risk The recommendations listed below are grounded in two convictions(信念): that motivating peopl
admin
2010-04-12
28
问题
Bird Flu: Communicating the Risk
The recommendations listed below are grounded in two convictions(信念): that motivating people to start taking bird flu seriously should be a top priority for government health departments, and that risk communication principles provide the best guidance on how to do so.
Start where your audience starts.
Telling people who believe X that they ought to believe Y naturally provokes resistance. You can’t ignore X and just say YY-Y-Y-Y. You can’t simply tell people they’re wrong. You’ve got to start where they are, with X, and empathically explain why X seems logical, why it’s widely believed, why you used to believe it too.., and why, surprisingly, Y turns out to be closer to the truth.
The biggest barrier to sounding the alarm about bird flu is that it’s flu usually seen as a ho-hum(漠不关心的) disease. It would help if people stopped calling every minor respiratory infection "a touch of the flu" but that’s not going to happen. Empathy is the only answer. Instead of ignoring the fact that people think flu is minor, or berating people for thinking that flu is minor, acknowledge that even some pub{ic health authorities use the term "flu" in ways that minimize its seriousness. After making common cause with the public--"we have all ignored influenza for too long"--talk about how horrific the next flu pandemic(流行病) may be compared with the annual flu.
Don’t be afraid to frighten people.
For most of the world right now, though, apathy(漠不关心)is the problem--not denial. We can’t scare people enough about HSN1. WHO has been trying for over a year, with evermoredramatic appeals to the media, the public, and Member States. Until a pandemic begins, there’s little chance we’ll scare people too much.
Research evidence won’t protect you from criticism, of course. Fear appeals often provoke angry pushback from people questioning your motives or your competence, accusing you of "crying wolf" or provoking "warning fatigue" or panicking the public. That happened after WHO Western Pacific Regional Director Shigeru Omi said that, in a worst case, a bird flu pandemic could kill up to 100 million people (a well-justified estimate). Of course, there is a genuine downside to issuing warnings that turn out to be unnecessary. Although panic is unlikely and warning fatigue is temporary, there is some credibility loss, especially if the warnings were exaggerated or overconfident. But consider the alternative. Which is worse, being criticized for "unduly" frightening people or being criticized for failing to warn people?
Acknowledge uncertainty.
When the first Thai bird flu outbreaks subsided(平息) in 2004, a senior public official said: "The first wave of bird flu outbreak has passed.., but we don’t know when the second wave will come, and we don’t trust the situation... So the Public Health Ministry is being as careful as possible." This exemplifies two risk communication principles: acknowledge uncertainty and don’t overreassure. During Malaysia’s first outbreak, tests were pending regarding what strain of flu was killing the chickens. Senior veterinary official Hawari Hussein said, "We know it is HS, but we’re hoping it won’t be H5N1." This very brief comment not only acknowledges uncertainty; it also expresses wishes, another good crisis communication practice. Everyone shared Hussein’s hope, but feared the worst.
Overconfident overreassurancc ("the situation is under control, everything is going to be fine") is terrible risk communication. Paradoxically, people usually find it alarming. They sense its insincerity and become mistrustful even before they know the outcome. But overconfident warnings are also unwise. There is so much we don’t know about H5N1. How many people will it infect? How quickly will it spread? How long will it last? How long will it take for an effective vaccine to be available? Which countries and which people in those countries will get the vaccine first? How well will health care systems cope? How well will national and international economies cope? And how well will civil society cope?
Bird flu experts and risk communicators cannot answer these questions. But we can and should raise them, acknowledging our uncertainty at every turn.
Share dilemmas.
Sharing dilemmas is a lot like acknowledging uncertainty. Not only are we unsure about what will happen; we’re also unsure about what to do. Everyone finds this hard to admit. But dilemmasharing has huge advantages:
It humanizes the organization by letting the pain of difficult decisions show.
It gives people a chance to make suggestions and be part of the process.
It moderates the conflict between opposing recommendations.
It reduces the outrage if you turn out to be wrong.
Dilemma-sharing does raise some anxiety at first, but it allies with the public’s resourceful, mature side. This leads to better buy-in and better coping down the road. The most important bird flu dilemma at the moment is stockpiling(储备). If we stockpile H5 antigen(抗原) or an H5N1 vaccine (once it exists), that may save millions of lives if a pandemic materializes. But a vaccine is no magic solution. We probably can’t make and distribute enough vaccine for most of the world. And what if there is no pandemic? Or what if the virus mutates(突变) or drifts a lot, and the vaccine proves minimally useful? Is this really a good use of scarce health dollars, especially in developing countries? Maybe we should stockpile antiviral drugs. But they’re expensive, and who knows how well they will work against the actual pandemic strain that arises? The worst response to the stockpiling dilemma is also the most tempting: Stockpile only a little vaccine and some antivirals and imply that you have enough. Some officials are already engaging in this kind of over reassurance. The risk communication answer: Share the dilemma and let the public help you decide.
Give people things to do.
One reason sometimes given for not alarming the public is that there’s nothing for people to do anyway. A Jan. 13, 2005 Wall Street Journal article quoted Canadian infectious disease expert Richard Schabas as saying: "Scaring people about avian influenza accomplishes nothing, because we’re not asking people to do anything about it. " But the error isn’t scaring people. The error is failing to realize and say how much they can do to prepare.
Helping resolve government policy dilemmas is just the beginning. Thailand, for example, has trained almost a million volunteers to reach out to every village in the country to inform people about the risks and signs of bird flu and how to try to protect themselves and their flocks. Many companies, hospitals, schools, and local governments around the world are starting to plan for "business continuity" in the event of a pandemic. Even cognitive and emotional rehearsal learning about HSN1 and thinking about what a pandemic might be like and how you’d cope is a kind of preparedness and a kind of involvement. The WHO outbreak guidelines say, "If possible, representatives of the public should be brought into the decision-making process... Risk communication messages should include information about what the public can do to make themselves safer. "
Helping resolve government policy dilemmas is______.
选项
答案
just the beginning.
解析
文章在“Give people things to do ”一段中说道:“Helping resolve government policy dilemmas is just the beginning.”从而得出答案为:just the beginning。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/aMj7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Youshouldnotfearspidersbecauseoftheirpoison.OfallthespidersinNorthAmerica,onlyonekindisvery【B1】______andmo
A、Becausehistoryprofessorsarepoorlyprepared.B、Becausemoststudentsarelazy.C、Becausehistorylecturesarenotdelivered
A、Therewillbealotofpeople.B、Theywillhavedinnertogetherfirst.C、Theylivefarfromthetheatre.D、Therewillbeahea
Withoursocietyprogressingsmoothlytowardthetwenty-lustcentury,itseemsthatthestablestructureoffamilyisalsochang
TheLanguageLearningTheorycourseisanoptionduringthethirdsemesterofyourprogram.Itisanintroductiontoaspectsof
Icameacrossanoldcountryguidetheotherday.Itlistedallthetradesmenineachvillageinmypartofthecountry,andit
Icameacrossanoldcountryguidetheotherday.Itlistedallthetradesmenineachvillageinmypartofthecountry,andit
_____________(和一般流行的信念相反),vigorousexerciseactuallyonlydecreasesyourappetite.
BirdFlu:CommunicatingtheRiskTherecommendationslistedbelowaregroundedintwoconvictions(信念):thatmotivatingpeopl
随机试题
若每年营业现金净流量相等,则投资回收期的计算公式为()
痰热与湿热的舌象相同的表现是()。
印模边缘厚度应为
甲因赌博被A市公安局8区公安分局C派出所处以罚款。甲不服,提出行政复议。本案中可以作为行政复议机关的是( )。
下列关于基金组合投资的说法,正确的有()。
与老子、许慎、玄奘、于谦生活时期相对应的朝代是()。
1.为深入贯彻落实党中央、国务院关于优化营商环境和推进“放管服”改革的部署要求,2017年9月,税务总局发布《关于进一步深化税务系统“放管服”改革优化税收环境的若干意见》(以下简称《意见》),集成推动税务系统“放管服”改革提质升级。简政放权作为“放管服”
重大飞行事故罪,是指航空人员违反规章制度,因而发生重大飞行事故,危及公共安全,造成严重后果的行为。根据定义,下列属于重大飞行事故罪的是()。
某地区自上世纪70年代开始,引入栽种欧美黑杨,用于造纸。这些欧美黑杨适应当地气候环境,生长速度快,种植面积迅速扩大。然而近年来,当地生态环境问题日趋严重。因此有人认为,可以通过砍掉这些欧美黑杨来修复该地区生态环境。 以下选项最能指出上述论述缺陷的是(
宋代是我国手工业与商业蓬勃发展的时期,历史学家研究发现,宋代民间崇拜的神灵被认为除了具备驱灾治病、保境安民等传统农业社会型的神灵外,还开始拥有诸如预告物价、保护商贾等神灵。一FYtj观点与这一历史现象所蕴含的哲学原理相同的是()
最新回复
(
0
)