首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
职业资格
The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago
The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago
admin
2015-03-27
72
问题
The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago, and the subject was salt. Researchers were claiming that salt supplementation was unnecessary after strenuous exercise, and this advice was being passed on by health reporters. All I knew was that I had played high school football in suburban Maryland, sweating profusely through double sessions in the swamp like 90-degree days of August. Without salt pills, I couldn’t make it through a two-hour practice; I couldn’t walk across the parking lot afterward without cramping.
While sports nutritionists have since come around to recommend that we should indeed replenish salt when we sweat it out in physical activity, the message that we should avoid salt at all other times remains strong. Salt consumption is said to raise blood pressure, cause hypertension and increase the risk of premature death. This is why the Department of Agriculture’s dietary guidelines still consider salt Public Enemy No. 1, coming before fats, sugars and alcohol. It’ s why the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has suggested that reducing salt consumption is as critical to long-term health as quitting cigarettes.
And yet, this eat-less-salt argument has been surprisingly controversial—and difficult to defend. Not because the food industry opposes it, but because the actual evidence to support it has always been so weak.
When I spent the better part of a year researching the state of the salt science back in 1998— already a quarter century into the eat-less-salt recommendations—journal editors and public health administrators were still remarkably candid in their assessment of how flimsy the evidence was implicating salt as the cause of hypertension.
While, back then, the evidence merely failed to demonstrate that salt was harmful, the evidence from studies published over the past two years actually suggests that restricting how much salt we eat can increase our likelihood of dying prematurely. Put simply, the possibility has been raised that if we were to eat as litde salt as the U.S.D.A. and theC.D.C. recommend, we’d be harming rather than helping ourselves.
Why have we been told that salt is so deadly? Well, the advice has always sounded reasonable. It has what nutritionists like to call "biological plausibility". Eat more salt and your body retains water to maintain a stable concentration of sodium in your blood. This is why eating salty food tends to make us thirsty: we drink more; we retain water. The result can be a temporary increase in blood pressure, which will persist until our kidneys eliminate both salt and water.
The scientific question is whether this temporary phenomenon translates to chronic problems: if we eat too much salt for years, does it raise our blood pressure, cause hypertension, then strokes, and then kill us prematurely? It makes sense, but it’s only a hypothesis. The reason scientists do experiments is to find out if hypotheses are true.
The N.I.H. has spent enormous sums of money on studies to test the hypothesis, and those studies have singularly failed to make the evidence any more conclusive.
With nearly everyone focused on the supposed benefits of salt restriction, little research was done to look at the potential dangers. But four years ago, Italian researchers began publishing the results from a series of clinical trials, all of which reported that, among patients with heart failure, reducing salt consumption increased the risk of death.
According to the author, eating more salt______.
选项
A、has short term effect upon people’s blood pressure
B、has long term effect upon people’ s blood pressure
C、has negative effect upon people’s health
D、has no effect upon people’s health
答案
A
解析
文章倒数第三段说,盐会对血压有短期的影响,但是否会造成长期影响,还有待认证。故选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/awCv777K
本试题收录于:
英语学科知识与教学能力题库教师资格分类
0
英语学科知识与教学能力
教师资格
相关试题推荐
ThefirsttimeIquestionedtheconventionalwisdomonthenatureofahealthydiet,Iwasinmysaladdays,almost40yearsago
Ateacherhandedoutalistoftwenty"if"sentencesandaskedstudentstodiscussandfindoutthegrammaticalrules.What’sth
Whichofthefollowingnominatingpatternscanateacheradopttoensurethatallstudentsareactivelyinvolvedinclassroomac
Whiledoingawritingtaskeitherindividuallyoringroups,thestudentsneedtouseaparticularwordtheydon’tknow.Sothe
AccordingtoBartlett,reflectiveteachingincludesfivestages,thatis,mapping,informingandthreeotherstagesEXCEPT______
Illiteratepeoplesayfluentandrightsentencesalthoughtheyarenotabletostatethegrammaticalrulesexplicitly,whilesom
Manyyearsago,IcameacrossabookbyAnthonydeMellocalledAwareness.DeMellowasanIndianJesuitpriestwhosewritingwa
Whatdothefollowingsentencespractice?PeterandIwenttothecinemayesterday.PeterandIwenttothecinemayesterday.Pe
OneoftheexecutivesgatheredattheAspenInstituteforaday-longleadershipworkshopusingtheworksofShakespearewasdi
随机试题
市场营销策划的特点包括()
—DoyouknowwhatTomdoesallday?—IknowhespendsatleastasmuchtimewatchingTVashe______hislessons.
A.NAP强阳性B.t(9,22)(q34,q11)C.PAS阳性D.POX阳性E.非特异酯酶阳性,能被NaF抑制急性单核细胞白血病
患者,男,70岁。咳嗽、咳痰,伴痰中带血3个月。胸片提示右肺门类圆形阴影,边缘毛躁,有分叶。肺癌非转移胸外表现(副癌综合征)有哪些
案件进入审判阶段后,辩护律师可以享有哪些权利?
关于粗集料表观密度、针片状颗粒含量、磨光值、洛杉矶磨耗、坚同性试验方法,请回答以下问题。关于粗集料坚固性试验,描述正确的有()。
(2006年)图5-24所示的矩形截面和正方形截面具有相同的面积。设它们对对称轴y的惯性矩分别为Iya、Iyb,对对称轴z的惯性矩分别为Iza、Izb,则()。
不可否认,特殊类型招生是我国在一定历史阶段的产物,它曾经对经济社会和教育的发展发挥过重要作用。但随着时代的变迁,我们有必要对招生制度作出调整和规范,以更好适应环境的变化和社会的需求。表面看,给保送“瘦身”,再加上对高考加分政策的一再收紧,意味着“特殊通道”
正确的SQL插入命令的语法格式是
Youshouldspendabout20minutesonQuestions28-41whicharebasedonReadingPassage3below.T
最新回复
(
0
)