首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
职业资格
The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago
The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago
admin
2015-03-27
52
问题
The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago, and the subject was salt. Researchers were claiming that salt supplementation was unnecessary after strenuous exercise, and this advice was being passed on by health reporters. All I knew was that I had played high school football in suburban Maryland, sweating profusely through double sessions in the swamp like 90-degree days of August. Without salt pills, I couldn’t make it through a two-hour practice; I couldn’t walk across the parking lot afterward without cramping.
While sports nutritionists have since come around to recommend that we should indeed replenish salt when we sweat it out in physical activity, the message that we should avoid salt at all other times remains strong. Salt consumption is said to raise blood pressure, cause hypertension and increase the risk of premature death. This is why the Department of Agriculture’s dietary guidelines still consider salt Public Enemy No. 1, coming before fats, sugars and alcohol. It’ s why the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has suggested that reducing salt consumption is as critical to long-term health as quitting cigarettes.
And yet, this eat-less-salt argument has been surprisingly controversial—and difficult to defend. Not because the food industry opposes it, but because the actual evidence to support it has always been so weak.
When I spent the better part of a year researching the state of the salt science back in 1998— already a quarter century into the eat-less-salt recommendations—journal editors and public health administrators were still remarkably candid in their assessment of how flimsy the evidence was implicating salt as the cause of hypertension.
While, back then, the evidence merely failed to demonstrate that salt was harmful, the evidence from studies published over the past two years actually suggests that restricting how much salt we eat can increase our likelihood of dying prematurely. Put simply, the possibility has been raised that if we were to eat as litde salt as the U.S.D.A. and theC.D.C. recommend, we’d be harming rather than helping ourselves.
Why have we been told that salt is so deadly? Well, the advice has always sounded reasonable. It has what nutritionists like to call "biological plausibility". Eat more salt and your body retains water to maintain a stable concentration of sodium in your blood. This is why eating salty food tends to make us thirsty: we drink more; we retain water. The result can be a temporary increase in blood pressure, which will persist until our kidneys eliminate both salt and water.
The scientific question is whether this temporary phenomenon translates to chronic problems: if we eat too much salt for years, does it raise our blood pressure, cause hypertension, then strokes, and then kill us prematurely? It makes sense, but it’s only a hypothesis. The reason scientists do experiments is to find out if hypotheses are true.
The N.I.H. has spent enormous sums of money on studies to test the hypothesis, and those studies have singularly failed to make the evidence any more conclusive.
With nearly everyone focused on the supposed benefits of salt restriction, little research was done to look at the potential dangers. But four years ago, Italian researchers began publishing the results from a series of clinical trials, all of which reported that, among patients with heart failure, reducing salt consumption increased the risk of death.
According to the author, eating more salt______.
选项
A、has short term effect upon people’s blood pressure
B、has long term effect upon people’ s blood pressure
C、has negative effect upon people’s health
D、has no effect upon people’s health
答案
A
解析
文章倒数第三段说,盐会对血压有短期的影响,但是否会造成长期影响,还有待认证。故选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/awCv777K
本试题收录于:
英语学科知识与教学能力题库教师资格分类
0
英语学科知识与教学能力
教师资格
相关试题推荐
Whenstudentsengageingroupwork,theteachermovesaroundtoprovidehelpifnecessaryandmakesuretheyaredoingthetask
AskingstudentstoexplainnewwordsinatextwithknownwordsisNOTanactof______.
Whichofthefollowingisaslipoftongue?
JulietsaysinShakespeare’sRomeoandJuliet:"What’sinaname?Thatwhichwecallarosebyanyothernamewouldsmellasswe
IfateachergivescommandsinEnglishandasksstudentstoshowunderstandingbyactionorgestures,he/sheismostprobably
Therearesomespeakingactivities.Whichofthefollowingmainlyfocusontheformandaccuracy?
Manyyearsago,IcameacrossabookbyAnthonydeMellocalledAwareness.DeMellowasanIndianJesuitpriestwhosewritingwa
TheBritishMedicalJournalrecentlyfeaturedastrongresponsetowhatwasjudgedaninappropriatelylenientreactionbyamedi
Toteachstudentswritingeffectively,teachersmayguidestudentsthroughthewritingprocessasfollows:①mapping②editing③ou
AsimplepieceofropehangsbetweensomeenvironmentallyfriendlyAmericansandtheirneighbors.Ononesidestandthosewhoha
随机试题
在牙周膜中,哪种细胞能增殖成颌骨囊肿或牙源性肿瘤
甲与同学打赌,故意将一台旧电脑遗留在某出租车上,看是否有人送还。与此同时,甲通过电台广播悬赏,称捡到电脑并归还者,付给奖金500元。该出租汽车司机乙很快将该电脑送回,主张奖金时遭拒。下列哪一表述是正确的?(2012/3/4)
应纳税凭证是指在中国境内具有法律效力,受中国法律保护的凭证。包括()。
城市电力负荷预测中,采用()预测城市居民生活用电量的近、中期控制性标准。
机床特性代号中的“Q”代表()。
以下审计程序中,属于风险评估程序的有()。
计算机病毒的_______是指只有在满足其特定条件时才启动表现(破坏)模块。
执行下列程序段后,变量s的值是()。DimsAslong,xAsIntegers=0:x=1DoWbile(x<10)s=d一xx=x+2Loop
Wheredoesthisconversationmostprobablytakeplace?
Artcanbemadeofalmostanything,includingsubstances【M1】_______thathavenotbeenproducedandusedinages,a
最新回复
(
0
)