首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
职业资格
The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago
The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago
admin
2015-03-27
79
问题
The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago, and the subject was salt. Researchers were claiming that salt supplementation was unnecessary after strenuous exercise, and this advice was being passed on by health reporters. All I knew was that I had played high school football in suburban Maryland, sweating profusely through double sessions in the swamp like 90-degree days of August. Without salt pills, I couldn’t make it through a two-hour practice; I couldn’t walk across the parking lot afterward without cramping.
While sports nutritionists have since come around to recommend that we should indeed replenish salt when we sweat it out in physical activity, the message that we should avoid salt at all other times remains strong. Salt consumption is said to raise blood pressure, cause hypertension and increase the risk of premature death. This is why the Department of Agriculture’s dietary guidelines still consider salt Public Enemy No. 1, coming before fats, sugars and alcohol. It’ s why the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has suggested that reducing salt consumption is as critical to long-term health as quitting cigarettes.
And yet, this eat-less-salt argument has been surprisingly controversial—and difficult to defend. Not because the food industry opposes it, but because the actual evidence to support it has always been so weak.
When I spent the better part of a year researching the state of the salt science back in 1998— already a quarter century into the eat-less-salt recommendations—journal editors and public health administrators were still remarkably candid in their assessment of how flimsy the evidence was implicating salt as the cause of hypertension.
While, back then, the evidence merely failed to demonstrate that salt was harmful, the evidence from studies published over the past two years actually suggests that restricting how much salt we eat can increase our likelihood of dying prematurely. Put simply, the possibility has been raised that if we were to eat as litde salt as the U.S.D.A. and theC.D.C. recommend, we’d be harming rather than helping ourselves.
Why have we been told that salt is so deadly? Well, the advice has always sounded reasonable. It has what nutritionists like to call "biological plausibility". Eat more salt and your body retains water to maintain a stable concentration of sodium in your blood. This is why eating salty food tends to make us thirsty: we drink more; we retain water. The result can be a temporary increase in blood pressure, which will persist until our kidneys eliminate both salt and water.
The scientific question is whether this temporary phenomenon translates to chronic problems: if we eat too much salt for years, does it raise our blood pressure, cause hypertension, then strokes, and then kill us prematurely? It makes sense, but it’s only a hypothesis. The reason scientists do experiments is to find out if hypotheses are true.
The N.I.H. has spent enormous sums of money on studies to test the hypothesis, and those studies have singularly failed to make the evidence any more conclusive.
With nearly everyone focused on the supposed benefits of salt restriction, little research was done to look at the potential dangers. But four years ago, Italian researchers began publishing the results from a series of clinical trials, all of which reported that, among patients with heart failure, reducing salt consumption increased the risk of death.
According to the author, eating more salt______.
选项
A、has short term effect upon people’s blood pressure
B、has long term effect upon people’ s blood pressure
C、has negative effect upon people’s health
D、has no effect upon people’s health
答案
A
解析
文章倒数第三段说,盐会对血压有短期的影响,但是否会造成长期影响,还有待认证。故选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/awCv777K
本试题收录于:
英语学科知识与教学能力题库教师资格分类
0
英语学科知识与教学能力
教师资格
相关试题推荐
Whenastudenthasmadeasentence"IborrowedapaperfromMissLi",theteachers;"Doyoumeanapieceofpaper?"Herethet
Whenastudentsaidinclass,"Igoedthereyesterday,"theteacherresponded,"Sayitagain,please."Theresponseisanexampl
WhichofthefollowingcanNOTbeusedasapre-readingtask?
Whichofthefollowingisanexampleofteachers’indirectcorrectivefeedback?
Onceourchickensstartedlayingeggs,wehadsucha______ofeggsthatweweregivingmanyawaytoourneighbors.
Toteachstudentswritingeffectively,teachersmayguidestudentsthroughthewritingprocessasfollows:(1)mapping(2)editing(
Lookingbackonmychildhood,Iamconvincedthatnaturalistsarebornandnotmade.Althoughwewerebroughtupinthesameway
Lookingbackonmychildhood,Iamconvincedthatnaturalistsarebornandnotmade.Althoughwewerebroughtupinthesameway
OneoftheexecutivesgatheredattheAspenInstituteforaday-longleadershipworkshopusingtheworksofShakespearewasdi
随机试题
期货价格的特点有()。Ⅰ.预期性Ⅱ.间断性Ⅲ.连续性Ⅳ.权威性
男性,55岁,甲状腺Ⅱ度弥漫性肿大,有房颤,诊断为甲状腺功能亢进症,经他巴唑治疗3个月后,房颤未消失,甲状腺未缩小,进一步治疗宜首选
具有补血止血、滋阴润肺、安胎功效的药物是
依据民法通则的规定,下列关于可撤销的民事行为的表述,正确的是()。
某高层办公楼供电电源为交流10kV,频率50Hz,10/0.4kV变电所设在本楼内,10kV侧采用低电阻接地系统,400/230V侧接地形式采用TN-S系统且低压电气装置采用保护总等电位联结系统。请回答下列问题。因低压系统发生接地故障,办公室有一电气设
对于饱和软黏土地基,通过强夯将级配良好的块石、碎石、矿渣及建筑垃圾等坚硬粗颗粒材料,夯入其中,从而形成块(碎)石墩,这种方法称强夯置换法,因其具有较高强度,由此()。
甲公司是一家从事汽车生产与销售业务的上市公司,2018年末有关资产负债表(简表)项目数据如下(金额单位:亿元):甲公司营销部门预测随着中国汽车行业的未来增长,2019年公司营业收入将在2018年50亿元的基础上增长30%,财务部门根据分析认为,2019
2017年4月,税务机关对某房地产开发公司开发的房产项目进行土地增值税清算,该房地产开发公司提供的资料如下:(1)2014年6月以18000万元拍得一宗土地使用权,并缴纳了契税。(2)自2015年5月起,对受让土地40%的面积进行一期普通住宅项目开
以下属于网络教学资源获取的手段的是()。
ThepurposeofholdingarobotraceistoFromthetextwecanconcludethattherobotrace
最新回复
(
0
)