首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of
admin
2012-07-05
32
问题
Farewell, Libraries?
Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of hardcover books came as no surprise. It had to happen sometime. But the news did conjure quite an interesting mental image: libraries that from now on will look smaller and less crowded.
For the moment, let’s not argue with the proposition that people will read as much as they ever have, no matter whether they read an actual book or a book on a screen. The habits of readers may not change (if anything, people may read more, or at least buy more— several stories have quoted e-book owners who say they buy more titles for their e-readers than they did when they were buying hardcover books). But if readers aren’t changing, their environments will. Rooms that once held books will—well, whatever they hold from now on, it won’t be books, or not as many books. Theoretically, your space will be more spare, more serenely uncluttered. That’s the theory, at least. My experience is that stuff expands to fill the space available. But you can dream.
All of this has already happened big time in the music business, where downloads have gradually but surely replaced CDs. I don’t know how many people I’ve overheard crowing because they managed to transfer their entire music collections onto their computers. All those CDs taking up space on the wall have gone—All those CDs that travel from car to kitchen to bedroom to living room, with the CD and the case getting separated somewhere along the way—a problem no more in the digital age. From now on, we’ll own what might be described as the idea of stuff, since the actual physical things—records, tapes, photographs, CDs, and now books—have been as good as vaporized, with the information contained therein stored away on a hard drive.
This, of course, is merely collateral (并行的) damage in the digital revolution, if damage it is. There’s as yet no way to tell if this transition is good, bad, both, or neither, but surely the absence of a physical library, be it musical or literary, marks a fundamental shift in the way we live and think about things. In music, for example, the rise of iTunes, Pandora, YouTube, and all the other online music players has quickly eroded our devotion to the long-playing album as the principal means of organizing music. After a half century of neglect, the lowly single is back on top. Most immediately this has consequences for artists, maybe not so much for the people who buy their music. But who knows?
With books, the absence of packaging does nothing to the contents. I can buy a hardcover copy of Moby-Dick or download it onto an e-reader, and Melville is still Melville. But I grew up loving Rockwell Kent’s illustrations of that novel, and later Barry Moser’s. It’s hard to think of the book without them. I can do that, certainly, but some little thing is lost.
Paperbacks and public libraries made books cheap or free but certainly available to millions who might otherwise not have been able to afford them, and all that happened long before I was born. Nevertheless, I was brought up by people who had been taught—and who taught me—that books were valuable things, things to be cared for and cherished, and I have owned some volumes for close to half a century (almost none of them, I should point out, qualify as "collectible" or valuable to an antiquarian book collector; owning a rare book makes me nervous. I like books I can hold, read, and even—here my mother is spinning in her grave— write in).
I come from a generation for whom the books and records on the shelf signaled, in some way, who you were (starting with the fact that you were a person who owned books or records or CDs). If you visited a friend, you took the first chance you had to secretly scan that friend’s shelves to get a handle on the person. I suppose I could sneak a peek at a friend’s Kindle, but is that the same? And try that kind of snooping on a bus or in a coffee shop and you’ll probably get arrested.
The stuff of our lives is a comfort. We look up at the shelves and we see old friends. Yes, there are books on my shelves that aren’t my friends, that I haven’t finished or even started, but someday I will, I promise—my home library is a physical manifestation of ambivalence. There is comfort in the continuity of seeing the same books year after year. I guess there might be some of the same pleasure in scrolling through a digital library or music play list, but somehow I think something will be lost.
For years audiophiles (音响爱好者) have tried to persuade more casual music fans that a vinyl record played on a decent sound system sounds better than a digital recording played on the same system. Digital sound is not as warm, not as seductive to the ear. The resurgence, albeit modest, of vinyl, especially among young listeners and musicians, proves that this argument is not generational. It’s not, in other words, just old fogies versus young hipsters.
Something of the same argument might be made for books, or for the tactile (触觉的) pleasure of holding and reading a well-made book. At its simplest, a book is a tool, or an information-delivery system, if you will, and it does what it does supremely well. To conceive of a world without physical books is to conceive of a world somehow diminished. It may be more efficient—yes, you can take a "stack" of books on vacation with an e-reader. It may spare quite a few forests from the ax. But efficiency is no substitute for pleasure. The future may be less cluttered. It may also be less fun.
What can we learn about the CDs in music business?
选项
A、They will take up much room of their collectors.
B、They will become cheaper because of less popularity.
C、They will be replaced by online music finally.
D、They will no longer appear in cars.
答案
C
解析
同义转述题。作者在本段通过CD的例子证实了电子书的发展过程,where引导的非限制性定语从句表明网上下载已经逐渐并一定会取代CD;第三句进一步证实了这一趋势——占据墙上空间的CD都没有了。由此可知,C)“它们最终将被网上音乐所取代”是对第一句的同义转述,故为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/az57777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、Disadvantagesoftallbuildings.B、Modernelevators.C、TheCrystalPalaceExhibition.D、Theinventionoftheelevator.D
TheUnitedNations:TheWorldinOneBuildingDoyouknowtheoldArabstoryaboutabirdcalledthephoenix(凤凰)?Firstit
A、Hewenttowork.B、Heclosedtiledoor.C、Hewenttobedagain.D、Hedidn’tgotobeduntilthenextmorning.C细节题。将原文wentbac
A、Theuseofhands.B、Differentwaysofexpressingpoliteness.C、Customsofancienttimes.D、Themeaningofthehandanditsact
A、Greeks.B、Arabians.C、Indians.D、Chinese.B细节题。短文中提到AmongtheArabs,itwascustomaryatonetimetokissthehandofasuperio
A、itwas50pounds.B、itwas80pounds.C、itwas20pounds.D、itwas40pounds.A此题考查听细节信息能力。解题的关键点在于听到“onsale”减价拍卖“reducefro
Alandfreefromdestruction,pluswealth,naturalresources,andlaborsupply--allthesewereimportant【C1】______inhelpingEng
FlagDay,June14,isthebirthdayofAmericanflag.Onthisdatein1777,theContinentalCongress【C1】______aresolutionstatin
随机试题
毛泽东思想活的灵魂是实事求是、群众路线和独立自主。蕴含这三方面基本思想的著作是【】
为降低呼吸运动对胸腹部MRI的干扰,临床常采用
对于大气环境三级评价项目,大气污染源调查只调查( )。
某冰箱生产企业为应对市场竞争,近年来一直以降低产品销售价格为主要竞争策略。为了改善经营业绩,该企业拟调整竞争策略,并为此聘请一家咨询公司对当地冰箱市场进行分析。咨询公司从委托单位得到了部分资料(见表1—1)。咨询公司决定采用德尔菲法开展工作,对影响冰箱
下列选项中,必须进行招标的有()。
某建设单位2013年9月1日领取了施工许可证。由于特殊原因不能按期开工,故向发证机关申请延期。根据我国《建筑法》的规定,下列关于延期的说法中,不正确的有()。
甲公司采用权益法核算对乙公司的长期股权投资,乙公司发生的下列业务可能引起甲公司“长期股权投资”账户增加的有()。
唯物辩证法的基本观点和总特征是()
设二次型f(x1,x2,x3)=XTAX=ax12+2x22-2x32+2bx1x3(b>0),其中二次型的矩阵A的特征值之和为1,特征值之积为-12.利用正交变换将二次型f化为标准形,并写出所用的正交变换和对应的正交矩阵.
Whatcanwelearnfromtheconversation?
最新回复
(
0
)