首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The FDA may rescind its approval of Avastin, a colon-cancer drug. If the summer of 2009 was the season of "death panels," as
The FDA may rescind its approval of Avastin, a colon-cancer drug. If the summer of 2009 was the season of "death panels," as
admin
2014-06-02
21
问题
The FDA may rescind its approval of Avastin, a colon-cancer drug.
If the summer of 2009 was the season of "death panels," as the debate over health-care reform exploded, this is the season of "17. 5k dead women a year. " That’s the body count scaremongers are predicting if the Food and Drug Administration rescinds its provisional approval of the drug Avastin for metastatic breast cancer, a decision expected by year’s end. Although the move has nothing to do with the new health-care law, uncertainty about "Obama-care" has given opponents an opening to terrify people about what’s coming—like bureaucrats rationing health care to save money.
The reality is far different and, for those who care more about helping cancer patients than about scoring political points, much sadder. That’s because in 2008, when the FDA gave "fast track" approval for Avastin in breast cancer that has metastasized—usually to the lungs, bones, liver, or brain—it was conditional on the manufacturer, Genentech, running additional clinical trials of the drug’s safety and efficacy. There was good reason for that. Avastin is an angiogenesis inhibitor, a class of cancer drugs that have not lived up to their hype: although they stop one mechanism by which malignant cells grow blood vessels to sustain them, the cells often activate a different mechanism and go on proliferating.
Although Avastin does extend the lives of patients with metastatic colorectal and kidney cancer, and remains FDA-approved for those uses, the new studies show it does not work the same miracle against metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Instead, Avastin increased what’s called progression-free survival (how long before cancer spreads or grows) by about one to three Weeks, depending on which chemo agent it was paired with. But it did not keep women alive any longer than chemo alone. To some advocates, progression-free survival without an increase in overall survival is still welcome, since it suggests patients have a better quality of life during their last months.
But it’s hard to make that case for Avastin. Not only did it not keep women alive, but it also caused hypertension, hemorrhaging, bowel perforations, and other side effects. "It seems as if the drug’s toxicity cancels out any benefit," cancer surgeon David Gorski of the Karmanos Cancer Institute told me. Perforated bowels do not equal a better quality of life.
These dismal results are what led an FDA panel to vote 12—1 in July to rescind the conditional approval of Avastin for MBC. Critics of health-care reform, predictably, saw nefarious motives—in particular, evidence that Obamacare will ration expensive drugs. (Avastin costs some $88,000 a year, though few patients live that long.) The Wall Street Journal editorialized about the "Avastin mugging," and Sen. David Vitter accused the FDA of "assigning a value to a day of a person’s life. "
If Avastin did extend lives for, let’s say, $ 10,000 a day, Vitter might have a case. But it doesn’t extend life at all. That makes allegations like the 17,500 dead women (from a right-wing blag) "utter demagoguery of the most vile and despicable sort," Gorski wrote on the blog Science-Based Medicine.
There are stories galore of women with metastatic breast cancer who are alive "because of Avastin." Indeed, patients have been flooding the airwaves and blogosphere with claims that Avastin helped them. But the only way to tell whether Avastin deserves the credit for keeping patients alive is through large studies. "There are always patients who live longer than average," biostatistician Donald Berry of the MD?Anderson Cancer Center told me. "They attribute it to the treatment; people love to make attributions." But when the proportion of patients alive at any given time in a study is the same whether they are receiving Avastin or not—as the two large trials found—then crediting Avastin is "very likely wrong. " That some women did live longer on Avastin, Berry explained, "may simply reflect the natural heterogeneity of the disease and say nothing about the therapy. "
Doctors can keep prescribing Avastin for metastatic breast cancer off-label, though insurers will not pay for it. Some activists welcome that. There is "no evidence of clinical benefit from Avastin, yet there is harm," says Fran Visco, president of the National Breast Cancer Coalition. "We need to demand more of treatment before we unleash it on the public. " Science-based medicine isn’t always pretty. But it’s better than politics-based medicine, which is what some critics of the Avastin decision are practicing—and much better than deluding ourselves into thinking something works when it doesn’t.
Which of the following is NOT the benefit of Avastin?
选项
A、It can help malignant cells grow blood vessels to sustain them.
B、It can extend the lives of patients with metastatic colorectal and kidney cancer.
C、It can extend the lives of patients with breast cancer.
D、It can help patients have a better quality of life during their last months.
答案
C
解析
首先,要看清题目,找出不正确的选项。所给的三个选项A、C和D分别可从第三段和第四段中得出均为正确的答案,而阿瓦斯丁不能延长乳腺癌病人的生命。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/bVpO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
AccordingtoJonHuntsman,forthefirsttimeinAmericanhistory,AmericaisallthefollowingEXCEPT______.
MedicineinMedievalEnglandThemedicalpracticesinMedievalEngland:Basedupon(1)______,ancienttexts,mythorthe
MedicineinMedievalEnglandThemedicalpracticesinMedievalEngland:Basedupon(1)______,ancienttexts,mythorthe
A、TheinitialsBBCstandforBritishBroadcastingCorporation.B、It’sapubliccorporation.C、Thegovernmentcan’tcontrolit.D
AgricultureinBritainI.Britishagricultureanditssupportingareas:accountforaround(1)______ofGNP.II.Smallpercentage
TheClassicalSenseofGoodGovernmentPoliticsplaysanextremelyimportantroleinhumansociety.Politicalphilosopherss
Banksarecloselyconcernedabouttheflowofmoneyintoandoutofthe【M1】______economy.Theyoftencooperatewithgovern
Cooperativecompetition.Competitivecooperation.Confused?Airlineallianceshavetravellersscratchingtheirheadsoverwhat’s
WhatmarkedthebeginningoftheRomanticAge?
随机试题
以下常用的高级程序设计语言中,用来开发UNIX内核的是___________。
下列关于中心性浆液性视网膜脉络膜病变的叙述中,错误的是
胞吐作用
根据《压力容器安全技术监察规程》对压力容器的分类,第三类压力容器里低温液体储存容器的容积()。
一般情况下,招标人在通过招标选择承包人时通常以()为依据。
市区某电信部门拥有房产原值1850万元(扣除率为30%),9月份将850万元的房屋出租,每月租金3.2万元,当月收取了半年的租金。9月提供电信服务取得收入140万元,其中包括随同出售的通信器材36.5万元。从事通信线路工程取得收入350万元,其中包括电缆、
我国《婚姻法》规定,禁止直系血亲和三代以内旁系血亲结婚。直系血亲是指和自己有直接血缘关系的亲属,三代以内旁系血亲是指与己身出自同一父母或同一祖父母、外祖父母,除直系血亲外的所有血亲。根据上述定义,下列选项中的甲和乙可以结婚的是()
被视为夺冠大热门的斗牛士竟然_________瑞士零封,最终0比1输掉比赛,这无疑给了野心勃勃要完成欧洲杯冠军再夺世界杯的斗牛士们重大_________。历史资料显示,首战输球的球队还没有夺冠的经历。第二场打洪都拉斯,西班牙除了获胜别无选择,这个小组的出线
在下列引起通货膨胀的诸因素中,()导致成本推进型通货膨胀。
In1957adoctorinSingaporenoticedthathospitalsweretreatinganunusualnumberofinfluenza-likecases.Influenzaissomet
最新回复
(
0
)