首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The FDA may rescind its approval of Avastin, a colon-cancer drug. If the summer of 2009 was the season of "death panels," as
The FDA may rescind its approval of Avastin, a colon-cancer drug. If the summer of 2009 was the season of "death panels," as
admin
2014-06-02
44
问题
The FDA may rescind its approval of Avastin, a colon-cancer drug.
If the summer of 2009 was the season of "death panels," as the debate over health-care reform exploded, this is the season of "17. 5k dead women a year. " That’s the body count scaremongers are predicting if the Food and Drug Administration rescinds its provisional approval of the drug Avastin for metastatic breast cancer, a decision expected by year’s end. Although the move has nothing to do with the new health-care law, uncertainty about "Obama-care" has given opponents an opening to terrify people about what’s coming—like bureaucrats rationing health care to save money.
The reality is far different and, for those who care more about helping cancer patients than about scoring political points, much sadder. That’s because in 2008, when the FDA gave "fast track" approval for Avastin in breast cancer that has metastasized—usually to the lungs, bones, liver, or brain—it was conditional on the manufacturer, Genentech, running additional clinical trials of the drug’s safety and efficacy. There was good reason for that. Avastin is an angiogenesis inhibitor, a class of cancer drugs that have not lived up to their hype: although they stop one mechanism by which malignant cells grow blood vessels to sustain them, the cells often activate a different mechanism and go on proliferating.
Although Avastin does extend the lives of patients with metastatic colorectal and kidney cancer, and remains FDA-approved for those uses, the new studies show it does not work the same miracle against metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Instead, Avastin increased what’s called progression-free survival (how long before cancer spreads or grows) by about one to three Weeks, depending on which chemo agent it was paired with. But it did not keep women alive any longer than chemo alone. To some advocates, progression-free survival without an increase in overall survival is still welcome, since it suggests patients have a better quality of life during their last months.
But it’s hard to make that case for Avastin. Not only did it not keep women alive, but it also caused hypertension, hemorrhaging, bowel perforations, and other side effects. "It seems as if the drug’s toxicity cancels out any benefit," cancer surgeon David Gorski of the Karmanos Cancer Institute told me. Perforated bowels do not equal a better quality of life.
These dismal results are what led an FDA panel to vote 12—1 in July to rescind the conditional approval of Avastin for MBC. Critics of health-care reform, predictably, saw nefarious motives—in particular, evidence that Obamacare will ration expensive drugs. (Avastin costs some $88,000 a year, though few patients live that long.) The Wall Street Journal editorialized about the "Avastin mugging," and Sen. David Vitter accused the FDA of "assigning a value to a day of a person’s life. "
If Avastin did extend lives for, let’s say, $ 10,000 a day, Vitter might have a case. But it doesn’t extend life at all. That makes allegations like the 17,500 dead women (from a right-wing blag) "utter demagoguery of the most vile and despicable sort," Gorski wrote on the blog Science-Based Medicine.
There are stories galore of women with metastatic breast cancer who are alive "because of Avastin." Indeed, patients have been flooding the airwaves and blogosphere with claims that Avastin helped them. But the only way to tell whether Avastin deserves the credit for keeping patients alive is through large studies. "There are always patients who live longer than average," biostatistician Donald Berry of the MD?Anderson Cancer Center told me. "They attribute it to the treatment; people love to make attributions." But when the proportion of patients alive at any given time in a study is the same whether they are receiving Avastin or not—as the two large trials found—then crediting Avastin is "very likely wrong. " That some women did live longer on Avastin, Berry explained, "may simply reflect the natural heterogeneity of the disease and say nothing about the therapy. "
Doctors can keep prescribing Avastin for metastatic breast cancer off-label, though insurers will not pay for it. Some activists welcome that. There is "no evidence of clinical benefit from Avastin, yet there is harm," says Fran Visco, president of the National Breast Cancer Coalition. "We need to demand more of treatment before we unleash it on the public. " Science-based medicine isn’t always pretty. But it’s better than politics-based medicine, which is what some critics of the Avastin decision are practicing—and much better than deluding ourselves into thinking something works when it doesn’t.
Which of the following is NOT the benefit of Avastin?
选项
A、It can help malignant cells grow blood vessels to sustain them.
B、It can extend the lives of patients with metastatic colorectal and kidney cancer.
C、It can extend the lives of patients with breast cancer.
D、It can help patients have a better quality of life during their last months.
答案
C
解析
首先,要看清题目,找出不正确的选项。所给的三个选项A、C和D分别可从第三段和第四段中得出均为正确的答案,而阿瓦斯丁不能延长乳腺癌病人的生命。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/bVpO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TheheadofgovernmentofUnitedKingdomis
Christmasisasadseason.ThephrasecametoCharlieaninstantafterthealarmclockhadwokenhimandnamedforhimanamorph
Thestrangercouldnothavebeenmorethantwenty-fiveyearsofage,andwasalittleabovetheordinary:height;hadhebeena
Cooperativecompetition.Competitivecooperation.Confused?Airlineallianceshavetravellersscratchingtheirheadsoverwhat’s
SuggestionsforEffectiveResearch-BasedAssignmentsI.Thefunctionofawell-designedassignment—Itteachesstudentsvaluable
Somepeoplesaythatfashionisjustforsellingclothes,soweshouldnotfollowitandweshoulddresswhatwelikeandfeelc
Iknownowthatthemanwhosatwithmeontheoldwoodenstairsthathotsummernightoverthirty-fiveyearsagowasnotatall
Thereisnomonthinthewholeyear,inwhichnaturewearsamorebeautifulappearancethaninthemonthofAugust.Springhasm
SimonFanshawepresentsdifferentpeople’sopinionsonBritishmannersbecause______.
随机试题
Thenewly-builthotelisideallyplacedforeasyaccess________manymajorattractionsinthecity.
患者,男性,27岁。既往有精神病病史。无明显诱因腹泻3天收入院。查体:体温39℃,血压85/34mmHg,白细胞22×109/L。该患者考虑脓毒症,脓毒症临床诊断标准中全身情况除题干中提到的表现外,还包括
某市甲木制品厂为增值税一般纳税人,2009年8月发生以下业务:(1)从某林场收购自产原木一批,收购凭证上注明收购价款200000元;(2)该厂将收购的原木从收购地直接运往异地的乙加工厂生产加工实木地板,实木地板加工完毕,收回实木地板并支付了
如游客在参观游览时突然患病,不要搬动患病游客,让其就地坐下或躺下。()
甲、乙两企业订有一份买卖合同。为了履行该合同,甲多方求购某种特殊的原材料,但是并未成功。正当交货时间临近时,本地某原材料公司丙主动上门提出以高于市场平均价3倍的价格向甲企业出售相当数量的该种特殊原材料。甲企业迫于无奈,按丙公司提出的条件与其签订了合同。随后
某画家从来不在其作品上标明日期,其作品的时间顺序现在才开始在评论文献中形成轮廓。最近,将该画家的一幅自画像的时间定为1930年一定是错误的,1930年时该画家已经63岁了,然而画中的年轻、黑发的男子显然是画家本人,但却绝不是63岁的男子。以下哪项是上述论证
___________acceptsdocumentsconsistingoftextand/orimagesandconvertsthemtomachine-readableform.
Formanypeopletoday,readingisnolongerrelaxation.Tokeepuptheirworktheymustreadletters,reports,tradepublication
•Youwillhearabusinesspresentationabout3simplesellingtactics.•Asyoulisten,forquestions1—12,completethenotes,
A、Totellpeoplewhethersomemedicalproceduresareessential.B、Tosolvetherelationshipproblemsbetweendoctorsandpatient
最新回复
(
0
)