首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page. For each question(1
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page. For each question(1
admin
2018-06-30
52
问题
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page.
For each question(15-20), mark one letter(A, B, C or D)on your Answer Sheet.
Recruitment Process Outsourcing
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO— has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while. Given that employers have been seeking help in their recruiting efforts for decades, it seems odd that the rise of RPO as a service solution has taken so long. Isn’t outsourcing of non-core functions a widely accepted business strategy? Isn’t recruiting one of the largest line items for many organisations and not a core function?
Today, however, organisations that consider outsourcing their recruiting efforts can pore over and compare tangible outcomes seen by those successful early adopters of RPO. But tread lightly. There have been a number of very public RPO failures where results have fallen woefully short of expectations, sending business leaders and the marketplace back into the boardroom to debate yet again the viability and sustainability of the solution. Can RPO be truly successful? If there are companies out there who are reaping the proposed benefits of outsourcing, what are they doing that others are not? The fact is there are common elements—let’s even call them tenets—that when followed, can greatly increase the effectiveness and ultimate outcomes of the RPO solution. Before we look at those tenets, however, it’s important to understand the history of RPO.
Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adjunct to an organisation’s internal staffing initiatives. Utilising the approach was simple: call your preferred recruiter(s)with a job description and expect screened candidates to be sent to you. Overall, this process continues to serve as a highly scalable option in many talent acquisition strategies, but it is extremely costly. Moreover, based on the transactional nature of the relationship, it comes with high risk and little accountability for results.
Companies soon realised they could bring the same talent in-house as contractors— their intentions clearly centered on achieving the same scalability but with reduced cost and greater control of the outcomes. In practice though, this model proved to be almost as expensive as high agency utilisation and surprisingly, with co-employment and other new issues, even more complex. Worse yet, the rates for contractors continued to climb as corporate recruiters began to seek out these new, more highly paid " nomad" positions instead of their corporate roles. The desired "direct sourcing" impact these recruiters were supposed to have never materialized as skills, and innovative approaches floundered without the access to best practices and innovative techniques that contingency recruiting agencies cultivated.
At the same time, traditional recruiting providers began to assume a more prominent role in assisting their customers with new ways to handle huge spikes in hiring. Although this represented a new challenge for both companies and providers, the solutions were primarily project-based and, therefore, rarely focused on achieving strategic improvements.
Over time, the RPO paradigm changed to finally justify its title, while providers literally began assuming delivery of an organisation’s internal staffing function. This early model was fraught with mistiming because most organisations treated RPO solutions like earlier transactional recruiting solutions. In addition, most providers simply weren’t ready to deliver at the levels they had signed up for. As the burgeoning industry learns from itself, organisations have honed their approach to RPO vendor management and some providers have refined their solutions to near industry-standard levels.
What will the author talk about in the following paragraph?
选项
A、He will continue to talk about the history of RPO.
B、He will talk about the principles of raising the efficiency and end result of the RPO solution.
C、He will talk about the types of RPO.
D、He will talk about different RPO solutions.
答案
B
解析
文中第二段提到“Before we look at those tenets,however,it’s important to under一stand the history of RPO.”即:我们在看这些原则之前,先了解一下招聘流程外包的发展历史,所以,B项符台题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/bi7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromtheth
TASKONE—ADVANTAGE•Forquestions13—17,matchtheextractswiththeadvantages,listedA—H.•Foreachextract,choosetheadv
TASKONE--THELISTENEROFTHETALK•Forquestions13-17,matchtheextractswiththepeople,listedA-H.•Foreachextract,deci
•Readthetextbelowaboutthelogistics.•Inmostofthelines41-52thereisoneextraword.Itiseithergrammaticallyinco
•Readthetextbelowabouttelevisionnetwork.•Inmostofthelines41—52thereistoneextraword.Itiseithergrammatically
随机试题
A.Hb<90g/LB.Hb<100g/LC.Hb<110g/LD.Hb<120g/LE.Hb<145g/L新生儿贫血标准是
案例某危险化学品生产企业从事危险化学品生产、制造和销售业务,该企业已向有关部门申领安全生产许可证,在等待证书下达期间,为保证工期提前生产。原料、产品是通过其所办的一家机电产品经营公司购买和销售的,这家经营公司从一家合法的危险化学品经营公司买进原料
()是国家为公民进入教师行业设置的第一道门槛,只有具备法定条件和专业能力,经认定合格的人方可取得相应的任职资格。
下列各句中,没有语病的一句是()。
在标准正态曲线下,正、负三个标准差范围内的面积占总面积的比例是()
下列对内部言语描述不正确的是()。
设η1,η2,η3为3个n维向量,AX=0是n元齐次方程组.则()正确.
Thefollowingparagraphsaregiveninawrongorder.ForQuestions41-45,youarerequiredtoreorganizetheseparagraphsintoa
DDT,themostpowerfulpesticidetheworldhadeverknown,exposednature’svulnerability.Unlikemostpesticides,whicheffecti
A、Hesentsurgeonstoserveinthearmy.B、Reprovidedsoldierswithmedicalsupplies.C、Herecruitedvolunteerstocareforthe
最新回复
(
0
)