Should the Treasury sell its economic forecasting computers for scrap? For the past two years no one outside the Conservative Pa

admin2013-01-28  34

问题     Should the Treasury sell its economic forecasting computers for scrap? For the past two years no one outside the Conservative Party and White-hall has believed a Treasury forecast. Anyone with half an eye on the unemployment figures or with a mortgage knew that Chancellor Norman Lamont’s repeated claims about recovery being "just around the corner" were untrue.
    Yet only a fortnight ago Gary Becker, an American economist, won a Nobel prize for his work on using economics to explain aspects of human behavior, such as drug addiction and crime. So why do e-conomists using Britain’s longest running predictive model still have trouble forecasting whether people will spend more or less money in the shops in the next three months? The answer is that they are caught in a race they cannot win, where however fast they try to keep their predictive equations abreast (not behind) of changing patterns in production and spending, peoples’ behavior changes faster.
    Some people claim economics and econometrics should be expelled from the broad scientific church. But that would be foolish. Their present weakness is that they are only perfect when dealing with theory. Use them to make real-world forecasts and things go wrong-principally the answers. But that is typical of a young science. Until the 1930s, only economists were interested in accurately predicting the economic behavior of large numbers of people. The Depression made it a matter of wider interest and urgency. The emergence then of national income statistics helped economics and econometrics to develop. But the art in using both still lies in knowing, when you are crossing the line between prediction and guesswork.
    The government seems not to recognize this. Of late it has pushed and pulled the levers of money supply, tax and interest rates like children let loose on the bridge of a ship. And politicians such as Lamont also have a hand in Treasury forecasts.
    "That is the worst way to use a science" , says Becker. "If economics has any claim to be a science and to belong to the Nobel award structure—and I firmly believe that it does—then economists should avoid political propaganda and convey to the public some flavor of the scientific quality of economics. The government should stop interfering and let its specialists apply their programs, which embody years of experience, as tools to solve the problem of how to make the economy healthy".  
The beginning sentence-of-the text most probably means that

选项 A、the Treasury computers are too outdated to be used in forecast
B、the Treasury is so short of funds that it should sell its computers
C、the economic prediction by the Treasury is no longer worth trusting
D、people are losing faith in the forecast of economic growth

答案C

解析 推理题。第一段第一句话提到,财政部应该把它的经济预测电脑当做废品卖掉吗?随后指出:过去两年,除了保守党和白厅之外,没有人相信过财政部的预测。这说明:财政部的经济预测根本不能令人信服。C符合题意,为正确选项。A是该句话的字面意思,与文意不符;B属于not given类型;D则误解了该句话的意思。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/c7p4777K
0

随机试题
最新回复(0)