首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeavor is surely publicly financed science. Morally, ta
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeavor is surely publicly financed science. Morally, ta
admin
2019-09-23
47
问题
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeavor is surely publicly financed science. Morally, taxpayers who wish to should be able to read about it without further expense. And science advances through cross-fertilization between projects. Barriers to that exchange slow it down.
There is a widespread feeling that the journal publishers who have mediated this exchange for the past century or more are becoming an impediment to it. One of the latest converts is the British government. Recently it announced that, the results of taxpayer-financed research would be available, free and online, for anyone to read and redistribute.
Britain’s government is not alone. Soon the European Union followed suit. In the U.S., the National Institutes of Health (NIH, the single biggest source of civilian research funds in the world) has required open-access publishing since 2008. And the Wellcome Trust, a British foundation that is the world’s second-biggest charitable source of scientific money, after the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, also insists that those who receive its support should make their work available free.
Criticism of journal publishers usually boils down to two things. One is that their processes take months, when the Internet could enable them to take days. The other is that because each paper is like a mini-monopoly, which workers in the field have to read if they are to advance their own research, there is no incentive to keep the price down. The publishers thus have scientists — or, more accurately, their universities, which pay the subscriptions — in an armlock. That, combined with the fact that the raw material (manuscripts of papers) is free, leads to generous returns. In 2011, Elsevier, a large Dutch publisher, made a profit of £768 million on revenues of £2.06 billion — a margin of 37 percent. Indeed, Elsevier’s profits are thought so
egregious
by many people that 12,000 researchers have signed up to boycott the company’s journals.
Publishers do provide a service. They organize peer reviews, in which papers are criticized anonymously by experts (though those experts, like the authors of papers, are seldom paid for what they do). They also sort the scientific sheep from the goats, by deciding what gets published, and where. That gives the publishers huge power. Since researchers, administrators and grant-awarding bodies all take note of which work has got through this filtering mechanism, the competition to publish in the best journals is intense, and the system becomes self-reinforcing, increasing the value of those journals still further.
But not, perhaps, for much longer. Support has been swelling for open-access scientific publishing: doing it online, in a way that allows anyone to read papers free of charge. The movement started among scientists themselves, but governments are paying attention and asking whether they might also benefit from the change.
Much remains to be worked out. Some fear the loss of the traditional journals’ curation and verification of research. Even Sir Mark Walport, the director of the Wellcome Trust and a fierce advocate of open-access publication, worries that the newly liberated papers have ended up in different places rather than being consolidated in the way they want.
A revolution, then, has begun. Technology permits it; researchers and politicians want it. If scientific publishers are not trembling in their boots, they should be.
According to the passage, people who are unhappy with publishers of scientific journals______.
选项
A、criticize the unfair publication of scientific articles
B、object to their slowness and the high costs of the journals
C、blame them for the slow pace of recent scientific progress
D、think that journals should be abolished as an obstacle to freedom of speech
答案
B
解析
细节题。根据题干关键词定位第4段第1句,从后文可知批评集中在两点:出版时间长达数月;垄断造成价格难以下降。故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/cAMO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Whichofthefollowingistrueaboutthepolitician?
A、isfreeofpropagandaB、iscontrolledbybigbusinessinterestsC、separatesfactandopinionD、operatesaccordingtoacodeof
A、tothelocalgovernmentB、intothecountryinwhichtheyhavebeenbuiltC、abroadD、tothelocalinhabitantsC推理判断题。关于一些旅馆的利润,
A、Match-MakingintheUSB、SecretsofSuccessfulMarriagesC、FriendshipandMarriageD、WaystoAvoidHarminMarriageB主旨题。全文首先介
StockMarketVocabularyandExpressionsdebtmarketliquidinvestmentup-and-comingcounterpartyliquidityim
ShouldUrbanGrowthbeRestricted?VocabularyandExpressionsrepercussionAbercrombiePlanoptimalaccommodateaut
TheTrendsofChineseTouristsTravellingAbroadVocabularyandExpressionsshoppingtourdutyfreeproductsTahitiM
Listentothefollowingpassage.WriteinEnglishashortsummaryofaround150wordsofwhatyouhaveheardontheANSWERSHEET
Thereportbelievesthatsomecompaniestendtofalsifyabloodtestresult.
随机试题
一个投资者投资三种股票,投资比例为3∶4∶3,贝塔值分别为0、8、2、2、5,投资组合的贝塔值为()。
简述领导者树立法治观念的必要性。
关于排便性质异常,错误的描述是()。
【2009年第4题】题1~5:某厂为进行节能技术改造,拟将原由可控硅供电的直流电动机改用交流调速同步电动机,电动机水冷方式不变,原直流电动机的功率Pn=2500kW,转速为585r/min,要求调速比大于15:1,请回答下列问题。该厂直流电动机的设备年
降低混凝土入仓温度的措施不包括()。
张某与某施工单位签订了一份三年期劳动合同,合同中约定的生效时间为2005年3月10日。为了考查张某是否具备相应的工作能力,合同约定了试用期,则试用期最长截止于( )。
商业银行流动性风险管理的核心是()。
指定居所监视居住的,除无法通知的外,应当制作监视居住通知书,在执行监视居住()小时以内,由决定机关通知被监视居住人的家属。
英国《银行家》杂志公布了2013年全球1000家银行排名,其中96家中国银行榜上有名。有4家中国银行进入前十行列,他们分别是中国工商银行、中国建设银行、中国银行和中国农业银行。在银行盈利能力排名中,()首次以一级资本指标排名全球银行首位。
Lookatthestatementsbelowandtheadviceonhandlingacquisitionsontheoppositepage.Whichsection(A,B,CorD)doeseach
最新回复
(
0
)