首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1) If a prize were to be awarded for the world’s clunkiest prose, the paragraphs of indecipherable text that make up "terms of
(1) If a prize were to be awarded for the world’s clunkiest prose, the paragraphs of indecipherable text that make up "terms of
admin
2022-10-09
24
问题
(1) If a prize were to be awarded for the world’s clunkiest prose, the paragraphs of indecipherable text that make up "terms of use" agreements would surely win. These legal thickets are designed to protect companies from litigious online shoppers and users of web services. Some firms require agreement, as when users are asked to click a box before creating an Apple ID. Other sites explain their policies without seeking customers’ explicit consent. Few consumers read these terms, let alone understand them. Because they involve no negotiation between customer and company, firms often insert language conferring broad protections to lower their risk of liability. But in a new twist, legal disclaimers designed to limit lawsuits are now unleashing litigation.
(2) A surge of lawsuits in America claims that companies’ online agreements violate consumers’ rights. Consumers are banding together in class actions against targets including Apple, Avis, Bed Bath& Beyond, Toys R Us and Facebook. The cases have a tinge of the bizarre, citing a law passed before companies even had websites. And the lawsuits accuse companies of illegally limiting lawsuits, a convoluted argument even by the standards of American jurisprudence. Nevertheless, the litigation could have broad implications for the firms involved and for future class actions.
(3) The suits seek to exploit the Truth-in-Consumer Contract, Warranty and Notice Act, enacted in New Jersey 35 years ago. This was intended to prevent companies that do business in the state from using contracts, notices or signs to limit consumer rights protected by law.
(4) Trial lawyers only recently began to use the TCCWNA to target online agreements. "All firms that seek to represent consumers are constantly mining different data fields for potential ways consumer rights are being violated, " explains Gary Lynch, of Carlson Lynch Sweet Kilpela & Carpenter, a law firm. James Bogan of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, which has defended companies in class actions, describes the use of the TCCWNA as "very creative". But class-action lawyers such as Mr. Lynch may have struck gold.
(5) The lawsuits vary, but generally include allegations that online terms violate consumers’ rights to seek damages as protected by New Jersey law and fail to explain which provisions cover New Jersey. Unusually in American law, plaintiffs need not show injury or loss in order to sue but merely prove violation of the TCCWNA. Moreover, the lawsuits are aimed not only at firms headquartered in New Jersey but all manner of companies that merely do business in the state. Gavin Rooney of Lowenstein Sandler, another law firm, counts about 40 TCCWNA cases in the recent surge. What is more, the TCCWNA entitles each successful plaintiff to at least $100 in damages, plus fees to lawyers and so on. If a website has millions of visitors, the costs to a company could be staggering.
(6) Whether the lawsuits will succeed is unclear. Whatever the outcome of individual claims, the barrage of litigation will probably prompt firms to adjust their online terms. "Don’t overreach." Mr. Rooney advises clients. For example, a company might no longer add words to terms-of-use agreements that seek to limit liability from gross negligence or fraud.
(7) That would be good news for consumers. But changes to terms of use do not always serve their interests. A growing number of firms, emboldened by favourable Supreme Court rulings, have adopted clauses that limit class-action suits. Consumers are instead restricted to resolving disputes individually, in arbitration. The TCCWNA cases may inspire more firms to add such caveats. That might limit frivolous suits. But consumers with grave complaints would be unable to sue, either. In the end lawsuits over restrictive contracts may make them more restrictive still. (本文选自 The Economist)
What do the online sites do to lower their risk of liability?
选项
A、They ask users to create an ID.
B、They get involved in negotiations.
C、They require customers’ understanding.
D、They design legal disclaimers.
答案
D
解析
细节题。文章第一段最后两句提到,公司常常插入一些将其可靠性风险降至最低、给予自身最大化保护的语言,但一个新的转折是用于限制法律诉讼的法律免责声明现在却在引发诉讼。由此可见,公司设置免责声明来降低赔偿的风险,故D为正确答案。A、B和C都是文中提到的细节,不符合题意,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/cJkK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、Inthehotelroom.B、Intherestaurant.C、Intheexerciseroom.D、Inthelobby.D①选项都是以介词In开头,可预测本题问地点。②对话中,工作人员告知男士如果需要用免费无线网
A、Becausethewriterscommunicateverywell.B、Becausetheyarebuiltonsolidarguments.C、Becausethewritersarewidelyknown
Canfamouspeople’ssupporttowardsinternationalaidorganizationsdrawpublicattentiontocharity?Thishasbeenintenselydi
[A]benefits[B]moving[C]restrict[D]waste[E]similar[F]save[G]separately[H]different[I]multiple[J]nonsalaried[K]number[L]
[A]benefits[B]moving[C]restrict[D]waste[E]similar[F]save[G]separately[H]different[I]multiple[J]nonsalaried[K]number[L]
ThefeverofluxurygoodshasnowspreadalloverChina.BuyinginternationalbrandssuchasLouisVuitton,ChanelandGuccihas
A.actionB.butC.distractedD.absurdE.analogiesF.pullG.copyH.authorsI.concentratedJ.appearedK.livelyL
EarnYourParent’sTrust1.【T1】ofprivilegesthatyouwant【T1】______Thereasonwhyparentsdon’tgiveyouprivilegesKidsmayu
WhatCausesJetLagandHowtoAvoidIt1.Facts■alongflightaffects【T1】________【T1】_________■thenatur
随机试题
案情:李某于2012年7月毕业后到某国有企业从事财务工作。因无钱买房,单位又不分房,在同学、朋友及亲戚家里四处借住,如何弄钱买一套住房成为他的心结。2013年4月,单位有一笔80万元现金未来得及送银行,存放于单位保险柜,李某借职务之便侵吞了全部现
You______herinherofficelastFriday:she’sbeenoutoftownfortwoweeks.
一般情况下,下列哪项血气变化不出现在肺弥散障碍
关于ARDS病人呼吸变化的描述,错误的是
中心线经被照体的内侧射向外侧的方向称
疠气最突出的致病特点是
某新建办公建筑,地上共29层,层高均为5m,地下共2层,其中地下二层为汽车库,地下一层机电设备用房并设有电信进线机房,裙房共4层,5~29层为开敞办公空间,每层开敞办公面积1200m2,各层平面相同,各层弱电竖井位置均上下对应。请回答下列问题。设在弱
流动比率小于1时赊购原材料若干将会()。
对于阅读教学的建议,正确的是()。
党的十八大对全面建成小康社会目标提出了新的更高要求,具体表现在()
最新回复
(
0
)