首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How to Reinvent College Rankings: Show the Data Students Need Most All rankings are misleading and biased(有偏见的). But they’re
How to Reinvent College Rankings: Show the Data Students Need Most All rankings are misleading and biased(有偏见的). But they’re
admin
2013-10-17
46
问题
How to Reinvent College Rankings: Show the Data Students Need Most
All rankings are misleading and biased(有偏见的). But they’re also the only way to pick a school. I’ve heard those exact words dozens of times and inferred their sentiment hundreds more. They undoubtedly were a major contributing factor in the 250,000 applications to the top colleges this past year. With only 14, 000 chances available, there will be a lot of disappointed families when decisions are announced in a few days. For 30 years, I’ve co-authored bestselling books and provocative articles about how to improve one’s chances of being accepted at a "top" college.
The first edition of our book Getting In ! revealed what went on behind the admission committees’ closed doors, and introduced the concepts of packaging and positioning to the college-application vocabulary. The newest edition adapts the same principles to the digital age. But the core message remains: good colleges are not looking for the well-rounded kid—they’re looking to put together the well-rounded class.
What were revelations in 1983 are common knowledge today—at least among college-bound students, parents, and counselors. They also don’t have to be told that the odds of getting into a "highly selective" school are ridiculously low. Brown and Dartmouth will each accept about 9 percent of applicants; Cornell, Northwestern, and Georgetown about 16 percent. And Harvard, Yale, and Stanford? Forget about it: less than 7 percent!
Wanting to attend a "name" school isn’t illogical. And there is nothing illogical in parents wanting a better return on their investment. A college’s brand value—whether that school’s name will be recognized and open employers’ door.
Colleges, counselors, and parents talk a lot about finding the right "fit" between a school and a student. In reality, the process is dominated by reputation.
The problem is that college reputations have been controlled by rankings. Far too many " highly ranked" colleges are gaming the rankings and trying to attract more and more applicants—when the particular college is actually a poor "fit" for many of the kids applying. Colleges want to attract and reject more kids because that "selectivity" improves the institution’s ranking.
College presidents publicly complain there are too many college rankings. Privately, they admit they have to provide the data that feed that maw(大胃口). They can’t afford to be left off a rankings list.
The real losers in this system are students and their parents. A bad fit is costly, not just in dollars, but in time, energy, and psychological well-being.
The emphasis should be on finding the right fit. But finding the right fit is not easy. Subjective guidebooks like Edward Fiske’s—originally titled The New York Times Selective Guide to Colleges—are very useful and consciously do not include rankings. Ted changed his three-category rating system to make it more difficult to simply add " stars" and rank-list colleges. Even families who can afford to visit lots of colleges and endure the backward-walking tours find that campus personalities soon blur in their memory.
Thus it is not surprising that anxious, busy parents turn to rankings for shorthand comfort. Unfortunately, the data that U. S. News and other media companies are collecting are largely irrelevant. As a result, the rankings they generate are not meaningless, just misleading.
Some examples: U. S. News places a good deal of emphasis on the percentage of faculty who hold a "terminal degree"—typically a Ph. D. Unfortunately, a terminal degree does not correlate(相关的)in any way with whether that professor is a good teacher. It also doesn’t improve that professor’s accessibility to students. In fact, there is usually such a correlation: the more senior the professor, the less time they have for undergraduates.
U. S. News’ second most heavily weighted factor—after a college’s six-year graduation rate—is a peer assessment of colleges by college presidents and admissions deans. You read that right; administrators are asked to evaluate colleges that are competitive with their own school. If not an complete conflict of interest, this measure is highly suspect.
Even some seemingly reasonable "inputs" are often meaningless. U. S. News heavily weights the number of classes with fewer than 20 students. But small classes are like comfort food: it is what high-school kids are familiar with. They have never sat in a large lecture hall with a very interesting speaker. So it is not something they could look forward or value.
While most rankings suffer from major problems in criteria(标准)and inputs, the biggest problem is simpler; all the ranking systems use weightings that reflect the editors’ personal biases. Very simply, some editors’ priorities are undoubtedly going be different from what is important to me. Assuredly, my preferences are different from my kids’. And both will differ markedly from our neighbors’ objectives.
Colleges say they truly want to attract kids for whom the school will be a good fit. To make good on that promise, colleges need to provide families with insight, not just information; and they need to focus on outputs, not just inputs. Collecting and sharing four sets of very different data would be a good start;Better insight into the quality of education a student will get on that campus. Colleges need to share the exam scores for all students applying to medical school, law school, business school, and graduate programs. These tests reflect not just the ability of the kids who’ve gone to that college, but what they’ve learned in the three-plus years they’ve attended.Colleges need to assess a campus’ "happiness" coefficient(系数). A happy campus is a more productive learning environment; and one that has a lower incidence of alcohol and drug abuse.The full debt that families incur(招致); not just student debt.The salaries of graduates one, five, and 10 years after graduation.
A fifth useful metric is what employers—both nationally and regionally—think of graduates from particular colleges. Hiring preferences are a useful proxy(代表)for reputation.
The last piece in enabling families to find a better fit will come from entrepreneurs. Some smart " kid" will develop an online tool that will allow students and parents to take this new college-reported data and assign weighting factors to the characteristics that are important to them. The tool would then generate a customized ranking of colleges that reflects the family’s priorities—not some editor’s.
Colleges may complain about the rankings, but they are complicit(串通一气的)in keeping them. It is reminiscent(怀旧的)of the classic Claude Raines line in Casablanca; "I’m shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!" If colleges really want kids for whom their college is a good fit, they will collect and publish the types of honest data that will give families a better basis for smart decisions.
Why do colleges wish to attract and reject more applicants?
选项
A、Because selectivity enhances the institution’s ranking.
B、Because a "name" college always selects students like this.
C、Because it indicates the college’s brand value.
D、Because it helps the college to find the right fit.
答案
A
解析
本题考查大学为什么希望能吸引并拒绝更多的申请者。定位句指出,这样做是因为淘汰率能够提高大学排名。A)是对原文的同义转述,故为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/cSc7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Boy,tourismreallyisabigbusinessthesedays.It’s【B1】______.Itinvolveshotels,transportation,restaurants,shops,andth
Anewbookissuretobediscussed,and【B1】______,atcollegesthisfall.ThebookiscalledMyFreshmanYear:WhataProfessor
BuildingtheCivilizedCampus1.大学校园里仍存在一些不文明现象(课桌文化、逃课、偷盗自行车等)2.分析问题存在的原因3.提出解决建议
A、$15.00.B、$15.40.C、$50.00.D、$50.14.B题目询问女士支付了多少利息。关键是要听到“repaysthe$5,000sheloaned,and$15.40interest”(支付了5000美元和15.40美元的
WhatisCulture?Culture,inanthropology(人类学),thepatternsofbehaviorandthinkingthatpeoplelivinginsocialgroupsle
Geographyisthestudyoftherelationshipbetweenpeopleandtheland.Geographers(地理学家)compareandcontrast(67)placesonthee
Adisheartenedyounglawstudentonce【S1】______me.Hehadfailedthe"bar(法律)examination"forthesecondtime,wasoutofmo
A、adogB、acatC、aratD、asnakeC细节题。对话中房东提出公寓里不许养大型动物。如dogs,cats,snakes;想租房子的人说他有只养在笼子里的老鼠,房东同意只要老鼠不跑出来就可以养了,所以正确答案是rat,其他的都是
A、Keepingoutthecold.B、Keepingouttheheat.C、Avoidingairpollution.D、Preventingthedust.A男士说房子经常用纸来防御寒冷,接着又说了几个例子表明纸可以御
HowtoKeepaBalancedLife1.在快节奏的现代生活中,人们越来越重视生活的质量2.如何保持健康平衡的生活3.我的观点
随机试题
抗结核的一线药是
简要说明生产力和生产关系、经济基础和上层建筑之问的矛盾是人类社会的基本矛盾。
A应用广谱抗生素B胸膜腔闭式引流C消除致病原因和脓腔D胸膜纤维板剥除手术E彻底排净脓液,使肺早日复张急性脓胸的治疗原则
受体学说包括
(2012年)共益债务是指人民法院受理破产申请后。为了全体债权人的共同利益及破产程序顺利进行而发生的债务。根据《企业破产法》,属于共益债务的有()。
唐代韩愈提出“以身立教”,才能“其身亡而其教存”。这在教师职业道德中是指()
(2012年真题)人身自由是我国宪法规定的公民基本权利之一,其内容包括
大多数孩子很难解释清楚一个表示他当前看不到或摸不着的物体的词的具体含义。但是,这些孩子却能够很好地运用这些词来表达他们的意图和情感。可见,懂得一个词的意思并非一定要依赖于对这个词的含义做出清楚的解释。以下哪项原则如果被接受,能够为上述结论提供最好的理
以下关于数据建模方法的共同点说法错误的是______。
A、Yeah,Iwilltakethefinalexamnextmonth.B、Yes,howareyou?C、Itisfine,isn’tit?D、Whereareyougoing?A本题测试对问候语的回答。“
最新回复
(
0
)