首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
[A] On the other hand are two compelling arguments against placing a duty on humans to protect endangered species. The first is
[A] On the other hand are two compelling arguments against placing a duty on humans to protect endangered species. The first is
admin
2020-03-31
27
问题
[A] On the other hand are two compelling arguments against placing a duty on humans to protect endangered species. The first is essentially the Darwinian argument that extinction results from the inexorable process of so-called "natural selection" in which stronger species survive while weaker ones do not. Moreover, we humans are not exempt from the process. Accordingly, if we see fit to eradicate other species in order to facilitate our survival, then to be it. We are only behaving as animals must, Darwin would no doubt assert.
[B] As I see it, there are three fundamental arguments for imposing on ourselves at least some responsibility to preserve endangered species, The first has to do culpability. According to this argument, to the extent that endangerment is the result of anthropogenic evenis such as clear-cutting of forests or polluting of lakes and streams, we humans have a duty to take affirmative measures to protect the species whose survival we’ve placed in jeopardy.
[C] The second argument, and the one that I find most compelling, is an appeal to logic over emotion. It is a scientific fact that thousands of animal species become extinct every year. Many such extinctions are due to natural forces, while others are due to anthropogenic factors. In any event it is far beyond our ability to save them all. By what standard, then, should we decide which species are worth saving and which ones are out? In my observation, we tend to favor animals with human-like physical characteristics and behaviors. This preference is understandablei after all, dolphins are far more endearing than bugs. But there is no logical justification for such a standard. Accordingly, what makes more sense is to decide based on our own economic self-interest. In other words, the more money and jobs it would cost to save a certain species, the lower priority we should place on doing so.
[D] What are the limits of our duty to save endangered species from extinction? The statement raises a variety of issues about morality, conscience, self-preservation and economics. On balance, however, I fundamentally agree with the notion that humans need not make "extraordinary" efforts—at the expense of money and job— to ensure the preservation of any endangered species.
[E] We should appeal to self-preservation. The animal kingdom is an intricate matrix of interdependent relationships, in which each species depends on many others for its survival. Severing certain relationships, such as that between a predator and its natural prey, can set into motion a series of extinctions that ultimately might endanger our own survival as a species. While this claim might sound far-fetched to some, environmental experts assure us that in the long run it is a very real possibility.
[F] The issue of endangered-species protection is a complex one, requiring subjective judgments about moral duty and the comparative value of various life-forms. Thus, there are no easy or certain answers. Yet it is for this very reason I agree that economic self-interest should take precedence over vague notions about moral duty when it comes to saving endangered species. In the final analysis, at a point when it becomes critical for our own survival as a species to save certain others, then we humans will do so if we are fit—in accordance with Darwin’s observed process of natural selection.
[G] The second argument has to do with capability. This argument disregards the extent to which we humans might have contributed to the endangerment of a species. Instead, the argument goes, if we are aware of the danger, know what steps are needed to prevent extinction, and can take those steps, then we are morally obligated to help prevent extinction. This argument would place a very high affirmative duty on humans to protect endangered species.
Order:
选项
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/cn1Z777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
WriteanoticeforvolunteersintheincominggraduationceremonyonbehalfoftheStudents’Unioninyouruniversity.Youshoul
Supposethestudentsinyouruniversityhavedonatedsomemoneyandclothestotheearthquake-strickenareainSichuan.Asthec
With950millionpeople,IndiarankssecondtoChinaamongthemostpopulouscountries.ButsinceChina【C1】______afamilyplan
With950millionpeople,IndiarankssecondtoChinaamongthemostpopulouscountries.ButsinceChina【C1】______afamilyplan
McDonald’s,Greggs,KFCandSubwayaretodaynamedasthemostlitteredbrandsinEnglandasKeepBritainTidycalledonfast-fo
McDonald’s,Greggs,KFCandSubwayaretodaynamedasthemostlitteredbrandsinEnglandasKeepBritainTidycalledonfast-fo
McDonald’s,Greggs,KFCandSubwayaretodaynamedasthemostlitteredbrandsinEnglandasKeepBritainTidycalledonfast-fo
U.S.technologyworkersmaybelookingatabetterjobmarketinthecomingmonths,accordingtoanewstudyfromstaffingfirm
TheEconomistcalculatesthataroundtheworldalmost290million15-to24-year-oldsareneitherworkingnorstudying:almosta
随机试题
患者男性,70岁。患冠心病20年,近1年活动后易发生心悸、气短,医生诊断为心功能Ⅱ级,护士指导该患者活动与休息的原则应为
患儿,女,15个月。呕吐、腹泻5天,12小时无尿。查体:精神萎靡,前囟、眼窝凹陷,哭无泪,皮肤弹性差,四肢厥冷。患儿首先的治疗应是
《中华人民共和国环境影响评价法》规定:专项规划的编制机关对可能造成不良环境影响并直接涉及公众环境权益的规划,应当在该规划草案报送审批前,举行论证会、听证会,或者采取其他形式,征求有关单位、专家和公众对环境影响报告书草案的意见。编制机关应当在报送审查的环境影
见票即付的汇票的付款请求权,如果自出票日起1年内不行使,则丧失其票据权利。()
下列属于我国空气质量周报工作监测项目的有()。
贫困大学生是一个特殊的群体,家庭贫困可能给他们的心理、精神、就业、学业、人际交往都带来一些负面影响。为帮助贫困大学生减少因此带来的困扰,帮助他们更好地成长,某高校开展了以“让青春飞扬”为主题的系列活动。下列活动中,属于教育救助服务内容的有()。
下图为某湿润地区地质构造和地貌示意图,读图完成问题。②地区地貌形成的主要外力作用是()。
你和邻居摘苹果和桃。假设你摘苹果的机会成本比邻居低,而摘桃的机会成本和邻居一样。下面说法正确的是()。①你摘苹果具有比较优势②邻居专门从事摘桃更好③你可帮邻居摘苹果交换邻居的摘桃劳动④邻居专门从事摘苹果更好
一般而言,移植VxWorks操作系统有4种操作类型,下面不属于这4种类型的是()。
Scratchythroats,stuffynosesandbodyachesallspellmisery,butbeingabletotellffthecauseisacoldorfinmaymakea
最新回复
(
0
)