2. 考研
  3. With the usual flood of immigrants from non-English-speaking countries, there comes a multicultural work force. Along with this

With the usual flood of immigrants from non-English-speaking countries, there comes a multicultural work force. Along with this

admin2015-02-12  29
问题     With the usual flood of immigrants from non-English-speaking countries, there comes a multicultural work force. Along with this diversity comes resentment felt by natives in the marketplace. Feelings of antagonism surface when accents are strong or foreign languages are used that some workers cannot understand. There is now a clash of forces in the workplace; the battle is centered around English-only policies. A growing number of workers are alleging discrimination on the basis of language.
    The federal law prohibiting job discrimination comes under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964(Title VII), which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. National-origin discrimination makes it illegal to discriminate against an individual because of birthplace, ancestry, culture or linguistic characteristics common to a specific ethnic group. A rule requiring that employees speak only English on the job may violate Title VII unless an employer shows that the requirement is necessary for conducting the business. If the employer believes such a rule is necessary, employees must be informed of when English is required and the consequences for violating the rule.
    Donna Fernandez, language rights attorney at the Employment Law Center of San Francisco, finds that language discrimination is very prevalent in the workplace. Fernandez states that the biases may include "English-only policies when the employee’s primary language is other than English" or "some people may be treated differently because they speak with an accent."
    It is illegal for an employer to discriminate against an employee because of language. However, the increase in language discrimination suits indicates that employers are treating employees speaking with an accent or in a foreign language differently. "Many companies don’t know they are breaking the law with the English-only policies," says Fernandez. The law in this area is still developing and many courts consider these policies to be a form of discrimination on the basis of race or national origin.(National origin refers to the country that a person, or that person’s ancestors, came from.)Employees can challenge a speak-English-only policy if: the rule is applied to employees who speak no English; they have difficulty speaking English; or the policy creates, or is part of, a work environment that is hostile toward national origin minority employees. An employer must show some "business necessity" for the policy. Even if there is a business need, the policy is still illegal if there are less discriminatory alternatives to the policy.
    Sibylle Gruber, assistant professor of English at Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Ariz., finds that employees may feel they are viewed as less intelligent if they cannot speak English perfectly. "Workers may miss out on promotions to positions of authority if they can’t express themselves or communicate clearly," says Gruber. Often, there are subtle prejudices against some accents more than others. Speaking with a French or British accent is less frowned upon than a Spanish or Vietnamese accent. By not promoting employees because of an accent or language bias, a ghetto effect is created in the work force, keeping certain accents and immigrants in low-level positions.
From the text we learn that national origin discrimination legislation makes it illegal to______.
选项 A、treat a worker with hostility because of their economic background
B、discriminate against a job applicant because of their parents’ religious practices
C、enforce English-only policies at work or school
D、terminate a worker’s employment because he speaks with an accent
答案D
解析 属信息推断题。题目中的关键词national origin discrimination legislation出现在第二段第二句：基于原国籍的歧视规定：由于出生地、血统、文化或一个特定的族群共有的语言特征而歧视一个人是非法的。由此可知，选项D符合此意(terminate意为“终止”)，speaks with an accent(说话有口音)正好属于这句话中的最后一个条件“一个特定的族群共有的语言特征”。而选项A中的economic background、选项B中的their parents’religious practices、选项C中的English—only policies都不在这些被认为是非法的范围之内，故可排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/cz74777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)