首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
When most animals die, nature likes to tidy up by making their bodies disappear. The remains get eaten by scavengers, bones are
When most animals die, nature likes to tidy up by making their bodies disappear. The remains get eaten by scavengers, bones are
admin
2016-03-10
21
问题
When most animals die, nature likes to tidy up by making their bodies disappear. The remains get eaten by scavengers, bones are scattered, tissues rot away and anything left over tends to get destroyed by the elements. Very occasionally, though, these destructive processes get disrupted. This usually happens when the corpse is quickly buried by sediment deposited by a river or blown in by the wind. Then begins a slow process in which minerals precipitate from groundwater into the encased organic material, eventually replacing it with a stony replica: a fossil.
Such was palaeontological doctrine for decades. But in recent years traces of soft tissue, such as blood vessels and bone cells, have been found in some dinosaur fossils. Now researchers have come up with an explanation for how these tissues were preserved for millions of years, which just might make it possible to extract some elements of prehistoric DNA.
That there was more in a fossil than meets the eye emerged in 2005 when Mary Schweitzer, a palaeobiologist at North Carolina State University, found something unusual after her team used acid to dissolve minerals from a fossilised piece of Tyrannosaurus rex bone. Left behind were some fibrous tissue, transparent blood vessels and cells. Many argued that this material must have come from modern bacteria and not a T. rex, since nothing organic could possibly survive the 68m years since the creature had walked the Earth.
In 2012, however, Dr. Schweitzer and her colleagues revealed the presence of proteins in a dinosaur fossil freshly dug up and carefully protected from any potential contamination. Moreover, one of the proteins the researchers identified could be found only in birds. Since dinosaurs were the ancestors of modern birds, the discovery made it hard to argue that soft-tissue material in the fossil could have come from bacterial contamination. Still, many scientists wondered how such a thing was possible.
In Proceedings of the Royal Society, Dr. Schweitzer and her colleagues collaborated with a team led by Mark Goodwin, a palaeontologist at the University of California, to seek an explanation. Organic material from dinosaur bones was studied using micro x-ray absorption spectroscopy, which allows scientists to examine the structure of matter using intense light beams. This led Dr. Goodwin to notice something remarkable: the organic material in the samples was thickly laced with iron nanoparticles. In animals, iron is most commonly found in blood and this led the researchers to wonder if the iron had come from blood cells that had once flowed through their dinosaur’s veins. Could it have played a part in the preservation of the tissues?
To test this idea, the researchers designed an experiment using freshly slaughtered ostriches which, being large and flightless birds, seemed to be a reasonable modern equivalent to dinosaurs. They extracted blood vessels from the bones of the birds and soaked them in a haemoglobin solution obtained from ruptured(破裂的)ostrich blood cells for 24 hours. The samples were then placed in both a saline solution and sterile distilled water. As a control, some of the blood vessels were put straight into saline solution or water without being pre-soaked in blood.
As expected, the ostrich tissues that went directly into the water and the saline solution fell apart rapidly and were entirely consumed by bacteria or heavily degraded in just three days. The same thing happened to the tissue soaked in haemoglobin and placed in water. But the treated sample in the saline solution remained intact and has stayed that way for two years now, with no signs of bacterial growth.
Dr. Schweitzer and Dr. Goodwin believe that highly reactive ions known as free radicals, which are produced by iron as it is released from the haemoglobin, interact with the organic tissue causing abnormal chemical bonds to form. These bonds effectively tie proteins in knots at the molecular level, much as the preservative formaldehyde does. This knot-tying makes the proteins unrecognizable to the sorts of bacteria that would normally consume them. This, they theorise, is how the soft tissues manage to survive for millions of years without rotting away.
The iron nanoparticles, however, may be doing more than just preserving tissues. Despite what happens in the science fiction world of " Jurassic Park" , no dinosaur DNA has yet been found. The reason for this is that DNA is thought to have a half-life of 521 years, which means that, after that much time, half of the bonds between the proteins that make up DNA have broken apart: after another 521 years, another half have gone, and so on. This leaves very little behind after hundreds of thousands of years yet alone the 65m years or so that stand between humanity and dinosaurs. Even so, Dr. Schweitzer and Dr. Goodwin still wondered if the iron-based preservation process might allow DNA to bypass its typical half-life and last a lot longer.
To find that out, the team used an iron-removal compound known as pyridoxal isonicotinic hydrazide and added four different stains that react only with either DNA itself, or with proteins closely associated with it in organisms other than microbes(微生物). Remarkably, in all cases, these specific stains lit up inside the ancient cells in the tissue samples. This hints that something chemically very similar to DNA can remain in a fossil and might yet be hidden precisely where it had resided during life.
In 2012, Dr. Schwaitzer’s discovery of the same protein in dinosaurs and modern birds could possibly prove______.
选项
A、dinosaurs might be the probable ancestors of modern birds
B、soft-tissue material could have come from modern bacteria
C、fossils should be protected from bacterial contamination
D、organic molecules of dinosaurs could survive in fossils
答案
D
解析
推断题。由题干中2012和Dr.Schweitzer定位至第四段。根据本段开头however可知,第三段与第四段是转折关系。第三段最后一句提到很多人都认为在恐龙化石中发现的软组织是来自于现代的细菌,没有什么有机质能够存活6,800万年。第四段讲述研究人员发现保护较好的恐龙化石里有一种蛋白质与现代鸟类体内的蛋白质一致。因为第三段与第四段是转折关系,第四段提到的研究成果是在论证说明与第三段相反的观点,故答案为[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/d67O777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
The"basics"taughtintheAmericanelementaryschoolsare
AmericanEnglishbeganwith
Thebookfromwhich"allmodernAmericanliteraturecomes"refersto
______gotAmericanoutoftheGreatDepression.
Whenmostanimalsdie,naturelikestotidyupbymakingtheirbodiesdisappear.Theremainsgeteatenbyscavengers,bonesare
Complaintsandlawsuitscannotsolvetheproblemofoverregulation,onlyideascan,butforanindustrybuiltonideasforsucce
Accordingtotheinterviewee,whatistheproblemofthepresentscienceeducation?
TheAmericanDream:MythorReality?Thoughtheterm"AmericanDream"iswidelyusedtoday,thereexistmanyproblemswese
随机试题
某烟厂4月外购烟丝,取得增值税专用发票上注明税款为8.5万元,本月生产领用80%,期初尚有库存的外购烟丝2万元,期末库存烟丝12万元,该企业本月应纳消费税中可扣除的消费税是()。
创伤愈合形成的瘢痕内含有结构是
患者男,60岁,高血压10年,与同事争吵后突然剧烈头痛、呕吐,到医院就诊查血压200/110mmHg。腰穿显示颅内压增高,其主要危险是()
按照现行的法律规定,出口消费品消费税的减免主要有()。
证券公司从事介绍业务过程中发生重大事项的,应当在()工作日内向所在地中国证监会派出机构报告。
理财客户经理在预测客户的未来支出时,不恰当的一项是()。
华林公司常年大批量生产甲、乙两种产品。产品生产过程划分为两个步骤,相应设置两个车间。第一车间为第二车间提供半成品,经第二车间加工最终形成产成品。甲、乙两种产品耗用主要材料相同,且在生产开始时一次投入(8月份甲产品直接领用了5000元,乙产品直接领用了6
“观念的东西不外是移人人的头脑并在人的头脑中改造过的东西而已。”这一观点表明
"Ofalltheginjointsinallthetownsinalltheworld,shewalksintomine."It’saclassicquotefromthefilmCasablanca,b
ThesecondpopulationmovementintheUnitedStatesbetween1890and1920mainlyfeaturedthepeople’smovingfrom______to______
最新回复
(
0
)