首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Suppose you go into a fruiterer’s shop, wanting an apple—you take up one, and on biting it you find it is sour; you look at it,
Suppose you go into a fruiterer’s shop, wanting an apple—you take up one, and on biting it you find it is sour; you look at it,
admin
2017-08-15
38
问题
Suppose you go into a fruiterer’s shop, wanting an apple—you take up one, and on biting it you find it is sour; you look at it, and see that it is hard and green. You take up another one, and that, too, is hard, green, and sour. The shopman offers you a third; but, before biting it, you examine it, and find that it is hard and green, and you immediately say that you will not have it, as it must be sour, like those that you have already tried.
Nothing can be more simple than that, you think; but if you will take the trouble to analyze and trace out into its logical elements what has been done by the mind, you will be greatly surprised. In the first place you have performed the operation of induction. You find that, in two experiences, hardness and greenness in apples went together with sourness. It was so in the first case, and it was confirmed by the second. True, it is a very small basis, but still it is enough from which to make an induction; you generalize the facts, and you expect to find sourness in apples where you get hardness and greenness. You found upon that a general law, that all hard and green apples are sour; and that, so far as it goes, is a perfect induction. Well, having got your natural law in this way, when you are offered another apple which you find it hard and green, you say, "all hard and green apples are sour; this apple is hard and green; therefore, this apple is sour." That train of reasoning is what logicians call a syllogism, and has all its various parts and terms—its major premises, its minor premises, and its conclusion. And by the help of further reasoning, which, if drawn out, would have to be exhibited in two or three other syllogisms, you arrive at your final determination, "I will not have that apple." So that, you see, you have, in the first place, established a law by induction, and upon that you have founded a deduction, and reasoned out the special particular case.
Well now, suppose, having got your conclusion of the law, that at some times afterwards, you are discussing the qualities of apple with a friend; you will say to him, "It is a very curious thing, but I find that all hard and green apples are sour!" Your friend says to you, "But how do you know that?" You at once reply, "Oh, because I have tried them over and over again, and have always found them to be so." Well, if we are talking science instead of common sense, we should call that an experimental verification. And, if still opposed, you go further, and say, "I have heard from people, in Somerset shire and Devon shire, where a large number of apples are grown, and in London, where many apples are sold and eaten, that they have observed the same thing." It is also found to be the case in Normandy, and in North America. In short, I find it to be the universal experience of mankind wherever attention has been directed to the subject. Whereupon, your friend, unless he is a very unreasonable man, agrees with you, and is convinced that you are quite right in the conclusion you have drawn. He believes, although perhaps he does not know he believes it, that the more extensive verifications have been made, and results of the same kind arrived at—that the more varied the conditions under which the same results are attained, the more certain is the ultimate conclusion, and he disputes the question no further. He sees that the experiment has been tried under all sorts of conditions, as to time, place, and people, with the same result; and he says with you, therefore, that the law you have laid down must be a good one, and he must believe it.
If you find a hard and green apple that is not sour, you should ______.
选项
A、try more apples to see if the natural law has changed
B、eat the rest of the apple at once
C、reject the law stating that hard and green apples are usually sour
D、conduct further investigations and make adjustments to the law of apples as necessary
答案
D
解析
本题的目的是让读者理解上下文,搞清演绎法的含义。四个选项中B和C明显错误。D项比A项更为全面,因此D项是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/d7FO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Pleasedonotbe______byhisoffensiveremarkssinceheismerelytryingtoattractattention.
From2007to2010,Americanhouseholdslost$11trillioninrealestate,savings,andstocks.MorethanhalfofallU.S.worker
Hesawwritersandartisteasbeingimportanttothestatefortheycould______credibilityontheregime.
It’samazingthattworesearchersworkingindependentlymadethesamediscovery______.
rathercrawlitlittlebeforealthoughsomethingformmakeoutcut
TheUnitedStatesisoftenconsideredayoungnation,butinfactitisnexttotheoldestcontinuousgovernmentintheworld,a
Whenitcomestotheslowingeconomy,EllenSperoisn’tbitinghernailsjustyet.Butthe47-year-oldmanicuristisn’tcutting,
Supposeyougointoafruiterer’sshop,wantinganapple-youtakeupone,andonbitingityoufinditissour;youlookatit,
Telecommuting—substitutingthecomputerforthetriptothejob—hasbeenhailedasasolutiontoallkindsofproblemsrelatedt
Therearealreadydrugsthatbrightenmoods,likeProzac,andotherantidepressantsthatcontrollevelsofabrainchemicalcall
随机试题
计算简答题:根据所给材料回答问题。(需计算后回答的问题,须列出算式;每个问题计算过程中的小数均保留实际位数,计算结果有小数的,小数保留2位。)某出版社拟出版一本由摄影家赵明撰写的随笔集《光影的记忆》。该书的整体设计方案包括:采用32开本,勒口平装
设函数f(x)在点x0处连续,则下列结论肯定正确的是().
白细胞显微镜计数描述正确的是
A、滑膜炎B、灶性淋巴结浸润C、灶性白细胞浸润D、类风湿结节E、血管炎类风湿关节炎关节外的主要病理基础是
关于口腔检查,以下不正确的是()
测定药材的总灰分时,温度应控制在
财务生存能力分析是通过编制财务计划现金流量表,结合(),考察项目资金平衡和余缺等财务状况,判断其财务可持续性。
阅读下面的古诗,回答问题。岭上逢久别者又别(唐)权德舆
国家垄断资本主义的含义是()。
和平共处五项原则中最重要的原则及精髓是
最新回复
(
0
)