2. 考研
  3. As a species, humans are incredibly smart. Our intelligence comes with a curious caveat: our babies are among the dumbest—or, ra

As a species, humans are incredibly smart. Our intelligence comes with a curious caveat: our babies are among the dumbest—or, ra

admin2023-02-22  63
问题     As a species, humans are incredibly smart. Our intelligence comes with a curious caveat: our babies are among the dumbest—or, rather, the most helpless—that exist. A baby giraffe can stand within an hour of birth, and can even potentially flee predators on its first day of life. A monkey can grasp its mother and hang on for protection and nourishment. A human infant can’t even hold up its own head.
    However, as Kidd and Piantadosi argue in their new paper, published in a June issue of PNAS, hu-mans become so intelligent because human infants are so incredibly helpless; the one necessitates the other. The theory is startling, but it isn’t entirely new. Researchers have been pondering the peculiarities of our birth and its evolutionary significance for quite some time. Humans belong to the subset of mammals, called viviparous mammals, that give live birth to their young. This means that infants must grow to a mature enough state inside the body to be born, but they can’t be so big that they are unable to come out.【B11】_____________The brain, therefore, must keep maturing, and the head must continue growing, long after birth. The more intelligent an animal will eventually be, the more relatively immature its brain is at birth.
    Researchers have long known about this trade-off, and about the connection between brain size and neural density and intelligence.【B12】_________________
    Kidd and Piantadosi’s new idea is that increased helplessness in newborns mandates increased intelligence in parents—and that a runaway selection dynamic can account for both. Natural selection favors humans with large brains, because those humans tend to be smarter.【B13】__________
    During their investigation, Kidd and Piantadosi realized something important that strengthened their theory. It turns out that another variable has an even higher correlation with intelligence  than brain size—time to maturity, or weaning time.【B14】___________________Orangutans  have smarter babies than baboons and they wean them longer. Baboon babies, in turn, are weaned longer, and are smarter, than lemur babies.
    Putting these facts together helped Kidd and Piantadosi develop their hypothesis. The connection be-tween head size and intelligence does create incentives for babies to arrive earlier. But it’s the connection between weaning time and intelligence that may really be driving the cycle.【B15】__________________And so the cycle continues.
    [A]  As we grew smarter, we were better able to take care of our infants, so they could be born more helpless and allow us to grow even smarter. This is why the cycle happens to humans and not to lemurs.
    [B]  You need to be smarter to care for more helpless creatures, which means you need a larger brain— which means that babies have to enter the world at an even more helpless stage of development, since there is a finite size to their brain at birth, mandated by the physiology of live birth.
    [C]  In other words, the time it takes to shepherd newborns through absolute helplessness to a point of relative self-sufficiency predicts primate intelligence more strongly than the best measure that has previously been proposed, namely, head circumference.
    [D]  For instance, Robin Dunbar found that the ratio of neocortical volume to brain size can predict the social-group size in a number of species, including bats, cetaceans, and primates, while Simon Read-er has demonstrated links in tool use and innovation to brain size in primates.
    [E]   This may create evolutionary incentives for babies that are born at an even earlier developmental stage, which require more intelligence to raise. This creates the dynamic: over time, helpless babies make parents more intelligent, which makes babies more helpless, which makes their parents more intelligent, and so on.
    [F]  This leads to a trade-off: the more intelligent an animal is, the larger its head generally is, but the birth canal imposes an upper limit on just how large that head can be before it gets stuck.
    [G]  This is a contradiction. Humans are born quite helpless, far more so than any other primate, but, fairly early on, we start becoming quite smart, again far more so than any other primate.
【B14】
选项
答案C
解析 空格前说基德和皮安塔多西两位科学家发现了比起脑容量，断奶时间与智力水平的关联更大。空格后是具体的例子，说明断奶时间越长，灵长类动物(Orangutans、baboons和lemur)的智力水平越高。空格前后都谈到了智商和断奶时间的联系．空格处应该也与之相关。C中提到的“将新生婴儿从绝对不能自立状态养育到相对独立状态所需的时间”(the time…relative self-sufficiency)即空格前的weaning time；而“这个时间比脑围更能有效预测灵长类动物的智力”(the time…predicts primate intelligence more strongly than…head circumference)对应前文的another valiable has an even higher correlation with intelligence than brain size，其中head circumference是brain size的同义表述。C跟空格前的内容表述一致，用In other words过渡使得前后衔接顺畅。此外，C中的primate intelligence正好对应空格后的三个例子。故确定本题选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/dZMD777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)