首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In recent years, we have all watched the increasing commercialization of the campus. The numerous ad vertising posters and the g
In recent years, we have all watched the increasing commercialization of the campus. The numerous ad vertising posters and the g
admin
2011-02-11
22
问题
In recent years, we have all watched the increasing commercialization of the campus. The numerous ad vertising posters and the golden arches of fast food outlets may be an affront to our aesthetic sensibilities, but they are, arguably, no worse than ugly. Some of the other new features of commercialized campus life do, however, constitute a serious threat to things we rightly revere. "Privatization" and the "business model" are the potential menace.
What do these notions mean? To me, they involve an increased dependence on industry and philanthropy for operating tile university; an increased amount of our resources being directed to applied or so-called practical subjects, both in teaching and in research; a proprietary treatment of research results, with the commercial interest in secrecy overriding the public’s interest in free, shared knowledge; and an attempt to run the university more like a business that treats industry and students as clients and ourselves as service providers with something to sell. We pay increasing attention to the immediate needs and demands of our" customers "and, as the old saw goes, "the customer is always right."
Privatization is particularly frightening from the point of view of public well being. A researcher employed by a university-affiliated hospital in Canada, working under contract with a pharmaceutical company, made public her findings that a particular drug was harmful. This violated the terms of her contract, and so she was fired. Her dismissal caused a scandal, and she was subsequently reinstated. The university and hospital in question are now working out something akin to tenure for hospital-based researchers and guidelines for contracts, so that more public disclosure of privately funded research will become possible. This is a rare victory and a small step in the right direction, but the general trend is the other way. Thanks to profit-driven private funding, researchers are not only forced to keep valuable information secret, they are often contractually obliged to keep discovered dangers to public health under wraps, too. Of course, we must not be too naive about this. Governments can unwisely insist on secrecy, too, as did the British Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food in the work they funded in connection with the bovine spongiform encephalopathy epidemic. This prevented others from reviewing the relevant data and pointing out that problems were more serious than government was letting on.
A recent study found that more than one-third of recently published articles produced by University of Massachusetts scientists had one or more authors who stood to make money from the results they were reporting. That is, they were patent holders, or had some relationship, for example, as board members, to a company that would exploit the results. The financial interests of these authors were not mentioned in the publications. If patents are needed to protect public knowledge from private claims, then simply have the publicly funded patent holders put their patents in the public domain or charge no fee for use.
Even philanthropic groups can sometimes do skew research and teaching. The Templeton Foundation, for example, offers awards to those who offer courses on science and religion. I teach such a course myself and feel the temptation to seek one of their awards. It seems innocent enough; after all, I am already teaching the course and they are not telling me what I have to believe. Moreover, they will put $ 5000 in my pocket and give another $ 5000 to my chronically underfunded department. Everybody wins, so why say no.?
The expression "keep...under wraps" in the third paragraph probably means
选项
A、keep sth. wrapped up.
B、make sth. done.
C、consider sth. bad.
D、keep sth. dark.
答案
D
解析
语义理解题。由题干定位至第三段。该段前面叙述一个加拿大医院的研究人员透露了某种药物有害的研究结果,被开除后,引起关注,恢复了工作。作者对此的评价是第六句提到的"This a rare victory…, but the general trend is the other way",可见,第七句说的是与此相反的情形:researchers are not only forced to keep valuable information secret,they are often contractually obliged to keep discovered dangers to public Health under wraps,too。显然,后面的keep…under wrapped与前面的keep…secret意思相同,为同义替换,故[D]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/dveO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
SomerecenthistorianshavearguedthatlifeintheBritishcoloniesinAmericafromapproximately1763to1789wasmarkedbyin
Insixteenth-centuryItalyandeighteenth-centuryFrance,waningprosperityandincreasingsocialunrestledtherulingfamilies
Insixteenth-centuryItalyandeighteenth-centuryFrance,waningprosperityandincreasingsocialunrestledtherulingfamilies
Insixteenth-centuryItalyandeighteenth-centuryFrance,waningprosperityandincreasingsocialunrestledtherulingfamilies
SomerecenthistorianshavearguedthatlifeintheBritishcoloniesinAmericafromapproximately1763to1789wasmarkedbyin
AdvertisingMediainAmericaIntheUnitedStates,therearemanymediaforadvertising.Theoldestkindisthenewspaper.【1
AdvertisingMediainAmericaIntheUnitedStates,therearemanymediaforadvertising.Theoldestkindisthenewspaper.【1
Modernlinguisticsattemptstodescribeandanalysethelanguagepeopleactuallyuse,andnottolaydownrulesfor"correct"li
随机试题
基金的财务会计报告通常不包括()。
属于非感染性发热的有()
导致虚热证的阴阳失调是
A、甘草酸B、紫杉醇C、青蒿素D、穿心莲内酯E、槲皮素具有抗菌作用的是
母亲王某带领儿子李某去北京动物园参观,因职员张某的疏忽没有锁好笼子,致使动物园的猴子逃出咬伤李某。现李某欲向法院起诉,请求人身损害赔偿。请问不属于民事诉讼的规制范围的事项是:()
产业资本循环的具体形式有()。
提出“文界”革命的口号,创立“新文体”的是()。
以下哪个选项中填入第一段话的横线处最合适?()上季度以下类型的企业家信心指数最高的是()。
[*]
ABiologicalClockEverylivingthinghaswhatscientistscallabiologicalclockthatcontrolsbehavior.Thebiologicalclockt
最新回复
(
0
)