Competition with research in universities is very harmful to teaching. Therefore, it would be much more beneficial to teaching t

admin2010-04-03  46

问题     Competition with research in universities is very harmful to teaching. Therefore, it would be much more beneficial to teaching to develop a sound program of educational research.  Such a program would improve teaching theory and technique. It would also make clear what competencies are required of a good teacher as well as help professors attain them.
    Educational research should be required to meet the same standards as scientific research, but it cannot be raised to those standards without comparable support and duty. Competent educational research is no more a part-time activity than competent scientific research. The relatively trivial (琐碎的) educational research so common in the universities is an inseparable result of trivial duties by the universities. Rather than look down upon such research, the professors have an obligation to see that it is upgraded.
    Let no one think that educational research is easy; it is concerned with no less than solving the complexities of the human mind.  There is no reason to believe that an effective theory and technology of instruction is easier to achieve than controlled nuclear fusion.  It is certainly every bit as worthy.
What is the author’s attitude towards trivial educational research?

选项 A、It should not be paid attention to by professors.
B、It can be looked down upon by competent professors.
C、It does not have the same duties with competent research.
D、It does not need improvement.

答案C

解析 推理判断题。本题询问作者刘琐碎的教育研究的态度如何。根据第二段第一句话后半部分可知,健全的教育研究规划标准要分清不同的责任,本段第三句话表明琐碎的教育研究也是研究规划的一部分,所以,琐碎的教育研究应该和高水平的教育研究责任不同,故选项C(与高水平研究职责不同)为正确答案。根据第二段最后一句话可知,大学教授们不应该歧视琐碎的教育研究,他们应该有义务提高这些研究的水平,说明了教授应该重视这样的研究,故选项A(教授不应该重视这些研究)、选项B(有能力的教授可以看不起这些研究)以及选项D(这些研究不需要改善)等说法均不符合文意,故不选。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/e2lK777K
0

最新回复(0)