首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The other day, I walked into an airport men’s room, which was empty except for one man, who appeared to be having a loud, animat
The other day, I walked into an airport men’s room, which was empty except for one man, who appeared to be having a loud, animat
admin
2015-10-21
76
问题
The other day, I walked into an airport men’s room, which was empty except for one man, who appeared to be having a loud, animated conversation with a urinal. Ten years ago, I would have turned right around and walked briskly back out of there. One rule my parents stressed when I was a child was: " Never stay in a restroom with a man who talks to the plumbing."
But, of course, as a modern human, I knew that this man was talking on his cell phone, using one of those earpiece thingies, with the little microphone on the wire, the kind that people feel they must shout at, to make sure their vital messages are getting through.
It’s not clear to me why so many people in airports use the earpiece thingies. Why do they need to keep their hands free? Do they expect some emergency to suddenly arise that will require them to have both hands free while talking?
Or maybe they’re afraid that if they hold the phone next to their head, the radiation will give them brain cancer. If so, an option they might consider is wrapping their heads in aluminum foil. Granted, this would make them look stupid. But not nearly as stupid as they look shouting into their earpiece wires.
So anyway, there I was, in this restroom, standing maybe six feet from this guy, both of us facing the wall, him shouting at his urinal about some business thing involving specifications, and at some point he said "I swear this is a direct quote—I am handling it. "This caused me to emit an involuntary snorting sound(not loud; certainly nowhere near as loud as this guy was talking; just a little snortlet),which caused the guy to stop talking and—violating the No. 1 Guy Rule of Restroom Etiquette? —turn his head and look directly at me, so I could see(using peripheral vision)that he was irritated by my rude interruption of his conversation. Then he went back to shouting at the urinal.
The point is that every key element of this scenario—the cell phone, the airplane, the zipper— is made possible by technology. We know that technology is a wonderful thing. But at what point does technology go too far? Is it fair to say that cell phones, if used thoughtfully and politely, are OK, but that if a person attaches an earpiece thingy and walks around shouting in public, bystanders should be allowed to snatch the wire and sprint off down the airport concourse, with the shouter’s earphone, and possibly even the shouter’s detached ear, bouncing gaily behind on the floor?
I think we all agree that the answer is: Yes. When technology goes too far, ordinary citizens must take action. But the question is: How do we define"too far"? I will tell you. We define"too far" as"when scientists start putting weapons on cockroaches. "This is actually happening, according to an article in the Sept.6 issue of Science magazine, brought to my attention by alert reader Richard Sweetman. This article states that researchers at the University of California at Berkeley have been "mounting tiny cannons on the backs of cockroaches. "That is correct: These researchers have been outfitting live cockroaches with backpacks containing"plastic tubes filled with explosives. "
Of course, the researchers have a scientific reason for doing this: They are on LSD. No,really, it has something to do with figuring out how cockroaches have such good balance(You almost never see a cockroach fall off a bicycle.). The researchers have used their findings to construct a working robot roach that is, according to Science,the size of a breadbox. Swell! If there’s anything this world needs more than armed cockroaches, it’s giant, mechanized cockroaches!
Newspaper story from the year 2010:"A homeowner in Santa Rosa, California, was found shot to death in his kitchen Friday. Police said the man apparently was felled by 500 rounds of small-bore cannon fire, mostly in his ankles, indicating that this was the work of the gang of armed research cockroaches that escaped from a Berkeley lab. Police said the motive in the slaying was apparently a Ring Ding. In a related development, an escaped robot cockroach broke into an Oakland Wal-Mart and made off with an estimated 17,000 AA batteries. "Ask yourself: Is that the kind of story you want to read in your newspaper? No, seriously, this is bad. We need somebody in authority to look into this right away. Maybe Dick Cheney could handle it.
Which of the following adjectives describes the author’s attitude to using the earpiece thingies?
选项
A、Surprised.
B、Considerate.
C、Contemptuous.
D、Ambiguous.
答案
C
解析
态度题 第三段作者提出一系列问题表示对那么多人使用耳机的不解。第四段分析原因所在:或许他们害怕如果将手机贴近他们的脑袋,辐射会引起脑癌。如果是这样,他们可以考虑的一种方法是将他们的脑袋用铝箔纸包上。的确,这将使他们看起来很愚蠢。但是这还比不上他们对着耳机线大声喊叫愚蠢。可见,作者对使用耳机持轻蔑的态度,故[C]为答案,同时排除[B];整段都是对使用耳机的调侃,并没有惊奇之意,故排除[A];作者态度非常明确,故排除[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/eGKO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Allofuswouldagreethatinordertobesuccessfulinthepresent-daysociety,weuniversitygraduateshavetopossesscertain
ThelargestriverintheUnitedKingdom,whichruns355kilometresandemptiesintotheBristolStrait,is______.
AplainclothesNewYorkCitypoliceofficerwasshotinthefaceatTuesday1.______nightwhilepursuingamanataBrooklyn
AplainclothesNewYorkCitypoliceofficerwasshotinthefaceatTuesday1.______nightwhilepursuingamanataBrooklyn
Oneofthefirstthingsthatshouldstrikeanyhalfobservantparentisthespeedandapparentaccuracyinwhichachildproceed
HowmanyschooldistrictsandtheNationalEducationAssociationcriticizethelaw?
WilliamFaulknerwastheforemostAmerican______writerofthe20thcentury.
H.G.Wellsisoneofthemostfamouswritersoffiction.
EmilyDickinsonwrotemanyshortpoemsonvariousaspectsoflife.WhichofthefollowingisNOTausualsubjectofherpoetice
Experimentsonmonkeyswereviewedmuchmorenegativelythanthoseinvolvingmouse.Indeed,onlyexperimentstodevelop【M1】_____
随机试题
杨贤江又名李浩吾,曾著()是我国第一部用马克思主义观点来阐述教育问题的著作。
在治疗菌痢时,不宜应用
最早提出“什么知识最有价值”这一经典课程论命题的学者是()。
下列各句中,没有语病的一句是()
国际税收抵免是指在对本国的企业、公民或居民的来自国内外的全部收入所得进行征税的过程中,在外国已经缴纳了所得税,回到本国缴纳所得税时,将在外国缴纳的所得税款加以扣除。根据上述定义,下列属于国际税收抵免的一项是:
某家庭有6个孩子,3个是女孩。其中5个孩子有雀斑,4个孩子有卷发。如果上述断定为真,那么以下哪项不可能真,除了:Ⅰ.两个男孩有卷发但没有雀斑。Ⅱ.三个有雀斑的女孩都没有卷发。Ⅲ.两个有雀斑的男孩都没有卷发。
邓小平曾告诫我们:“谈到人格,但不要忘记还有一个国格。特别是像我们这样第三世界的发展中国家。没有民族自尊心,不珍惜自己民族的独立,国家是立不起来的。”因此,自觉维护国家利益就要
萨皮尔一沃尔夫假说的形成——2004年英译汉及详解Therelationoflanguageandmindhasinterestedphilosophersformanycenturies.【F1】TheGreeksassum
【B1】【B4】
ResearchingtheoriginofmedievalmanuscriptsBackgroundMedievalmanuscripts—handwrittenbooksproducedbetweenthefifth
最新回复
(
0
)