首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
An issue that many corporate executives ignore is the possibility that aggressive people seek reinforcement for their own destru
An issue that many corporate executives ignore is the possibility that aggressive people seek reinforcement for their own destru
admin
2010-04-30
54
问题
An issue that many corporate executives ignore is the possibility that aggressive people seek reinforcement for their own destructive acts. Television violence, for instance, and the widespread public concern accompanying it have led to Calls for strict controls on the depiction of violent programs.
In their decision making, some producers do not take responsibility for the equally important minority. Instead, they may gear their content towards the masses, who crave sexually explicit and violent action. Fortunately, this group has the ability to disseminate violent action rationally, realizing that in reality, people who commit acts of violence have to compensate for their actions by taking full responsibility for the harm they cause to others.
Not everyone can distinguish fact from fantasy. Not only is it the irrational people who commit the crimes in our country, but our own children who may errantly (错误地) be learning from day one that nothing bad will happen to them if they shoot their brother in the head with Daddy’s pistol.
Studies show that in one week of content analysis of prime-time output on seven New York City channels, there were 3,421 acts and threats of violence observed. Children’s fictional entertainment programs had three times the frequency of violent acts or threats recorded in adult programs. Many of these acts were committed without any compensation for the action without responsibility, then it must be acceptable behavior. Similarly, aggressive adults are seeking reinforcement for their own anti-social behavior from seeing attractive television characters behave in the same way.
Behavioral evidence has indicated that the anti-social effects of violent television portrayals are strongest and are most likely to occur among individuals who are already aggressive.
The ethical question is, should television submit to mass appeal or take into consideration the effects on certain members of society, including children? The consequences of televising violence are not only harmful to some viewers but concurrently affect the television stations in the form of loss of viewers and possibly gaining a bad reputation. There are many sources, including viewers’ associations and popular journalism, which have been condemning the depiction of violence in television programs as a potentially dangerous and anti-social act on the part of those who make and transmit programs. Still, even though these associations have been condemning television violence, their efforts have had little effect on the large money-making corporations. Therefore, the decision, on the part of those in charge of the programs, should be one of social responsibility.
In his article, "Sex and Violence", Joe Saltzman states, "If, as producers argue, violence is a part of the human condition, then so is responsibility. In real life, you just do not commit mayhem and then go on to the next scene."
It is also necessary to realize that violence is part of our nature and of our life. Almost every day we are participants and observers of violence, whether it is natural violence, theatrical or fictional violence, sporting event violence, or political violence. To exclude all scenes of violence form television would be to falsify the picture of life.
Television media can "encourage or aid" destructive behavior, not "cause" it. There are usually many more casual factors involved. To tell people what they can and can not say, write, and televise is unconstitutional; however, it can be controlled and we can hope that the dacisionmakers will promote strong moral, ethical values in their decision making or at least consider them, in order to help prevent our violent self-destructive behavior.
By saying "seek reinforcement for their own destructive acts" (Para. 1), the author means" ______."
选项
A、find excuses to justify their violent behaviors
B、ask others to help with their aggressive actions
C、boost their confidence so as to committee more violence
D、compete with each other in committing violence
答案
A
解析
考查对句意的理解。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/eNOK777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、EarningaLivingB、CorrectAttitudeonJob-huntingC、HowtoChooseaJob?D、WhatCanaGoodJobOffer?BWhichisthebesttitl
A、Thenewcomedyopeningintowniswellworthwatching.B、She’dprefertoseeadifferenttypeofmoviethanacomedy.C、Shewo
A、Shehasnoideaaboutthemovie.B、Shedoesn’twanttotalkaboutthemovieatpresent.C、Sheregrettedhavingcometoseethe
A、Toencouragethem.B、Tostopthemimmediately.C、Togivesomeexplanation.D、Toleavethemalone.CW:Dr.Weinstein,shouldpa
______(由于天生具有显著的音乐才能),hebecameawell-knowncomposerandmusicianinhis
Inmyopinion,playingvideogames______(既花费大量的时间也有害健康).
A、Ithasbeenthebestsellerforweeks.B、Itadvisespeopletochangethemselves.C、Itisbeingsoldataverylowprice.D、Itd
A、Anopendoor.B、Anopendiscussion.C、Aprivateroom.D、Acloseddoor.D①男士问女士希望门开着还是关着,女士说自己希望保留一些隐私,因为跟Brown先生的讨论会很开诚布公,故选D。
FreedbySudan,"Geographic"ReporterArrivesHomeinU.S.After34daysinaSudanesejail,NationalGeographicjournalist
Everyyeartelevisionstationsreceivehundredsofcomplaintsabouttheloudnessofadvertisements.However,federalrulesforbi
随机试题
胆胃不和,痰热内扰,症见虚烦不眠,惊悸不宁者,治宜选用
A.提插法B.捻转法C.循法D.飞法(2007年第100,101题)针刺环跳穴,行针宜用(题)
"主治节"的脏器是
普通型和典型偏头痛两者的重要区别之一,在于后者有
头痛进行性加重并有颅内压增高见于()
在C国,卫浴产品属于兼具功能性和时尚性的产品。其功能性和外观时尚性的不同导致了不同企业之间的差异。T公司、K公司都为知名的国际品牌企业。设计研发水平高,在品牌塑造上投入较大,具有很强的品牌影响力,其提供的产品和服务的特征是追求顾客的高端体验,满足了顾客对
AttheageofeighteenIcouldn’twaittogetmyfirstjob,whichmeanttmadethefirststeptowardadulthood.Butitwas
Parentsofchildrenwhohappilyeatwhat’sputinfrontofthemmightassumetheirkidsarewellnourished.Buttwonewstudies
Doyouliketoeatout?Doyouliketoeatquickly?Doyoulikeinexpensivefood?Somepeoplegotofast-foodrestaurantforthe
Architectsandstonemasons,hugepalaceandtempleclusterswerebuiltbytheMayawithoutbenefitofthewheeloranimaltransp
最新回复
(
0
)