2. 考研
  3. One of the great intellectual conflicts of the early part of the 21st century concerns the role of man here on planet Earth. Som

One of the great intellectual conflicts of the early part of the 21st century concerns the role of man here on planet Earth. Som

admin2015-03-25  113
问题     One of the great intellectual conflicts of the early part of the 21st century concerns the role of man here on planet Earth. Some, like the followers of Stanford University biologist Paul Ehrlich— author of The Population Bomb—hold that mankind’s role boils down to that of exploiter of the Earth’s resources and despoiler of its natural beauty.
    This view, widely accepted in western political, cultural, and academic circles, is most commonly expressed by the so-called environmental movement in proposals that are antitechnol-ogy, antiprogress and, if fully implemented, will lead to a reduced standard of living in the developed world.
    It is an antihuman, antihumanist view, one that decries human achievement rather than celebrating it. And those who believe this way are once again calling on people to turn off their lights in observance of "Earth Hour" on March 26th.
    It’s a once a year event, one the so-called environmental community regards as a symbolic act urging businesses, individuals and lawmakers to take action in support of efforts to combat global warming, climate change.
    The proponents of "Earth Hour," the Competitive Enterprise Institute says, want "laws and sanctions to prevent individuals from freely using earth’s resources. " But, because the folks at CEI believe human progress and technological innovation have made life better, they are encouraging everyone to mark March 26th as " Human Achievement Hour. "
    The result of the environmental movement is a limitation on our ability to create the future wave of technologies and a hindrance on our ability to produce the current products that benefit or everyday lives.
    "You can sit in the dark and join them or you can join people around the world who plan to leave their lights on, affirming their appreciation for human inventions like electricity, indoor plumbing, mass food production, heat, transportation, and computers," CEI says, asking people to—through their actions—cast a vote " against environmental alarmism" and in favor of "human achievement. " They have a point. The Luddite, backwards thinking that portrays technology as evil has firmly taken root in western culture. In doing so it ignores the ways in which it has led to an improvement in global living standards, healthier people, better resource utilization and longer lives. To simply say the technology is bad, which is the implicit premise behind such crusades as the one to combat so-called global warming—remember it was former Vice President Al Gore who called the development of the internal combustion engine the worst thing to ever happen to mankind—is to doom all of mankind to an eventual return to the state of nature where, as Thomas Hobbes wrote, all life is "nasty, brutish and short. "
It can be inferred from the passage that
选项 A、Al Core and Thomas Hobbes held the same view on human progress.
B、turning lights off has great positive effects on climate change.
C、CEI has launched a campaign on leaving lights on March 26th.
D、the backwards thinking has been widely accepted in western countries.
答案D
解析 推理判断题。最后一段第三句提到勒德分子将科技看作恶魔的“倒退式”思维方式已在西方文化中深深扎根，该思想已被西方文化广泛接受，故[D]符合文意。文章最后一句提到Al Core反对内燃机的发明，希望人类回到最原始的状态，而Thomas Hobbes将原始状态看作是“令人讨厌、野蛮和短暂的”，可见二人的观点并不一致，故排除[A]；第四段提到“地球一小时”被环保社区看做是鼓励人们采取措施对抗气候变化的行为，但文中没有提及它产生的效果，故排除[B]；最后一段第三句提到CEI想通过自己的行动来让人们“投票”：是支持“环境恐慌论”还是“人类进步论”，并没有提及它发起一次运动，排除[C]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/em74777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)