首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Michael Porter, who has made his name throughout the business community by advocating his theories of competitive advantages, is
Michael Porter, who has made his name throughout the business community by advocating his theories of competitive advantages, is
admin
2014-06-13
72
问题
Michael Porter, who has made his name throughout the business community by advocating his theories of competitive advantages, is now swimming into even more shark-infested waters, arguing that competition can save even America’s troubled health-care system, the largest in the world. Mr. Porter argues in "Redefining Health Care" that competition, if properly applied, can also fix what ails this sector.
That is a bold claim, given the horrible state of America’s health-care system. Just consider a few of its failings: America pays more per capita for health care than most countries, but it still has some 45m citizens with no health insurance at all. While a few receive outstanding treatment, he shows in heart-wrenching detail that most do not. The system, wastes huge resources on paperwork, ignores preventive care and, above all, has perverse incentives that encourage shifting costs rather than cutting them outright. He concludes that it is "on a dangerous path, with a toxic combination of high costs, uneven quality, frequent errors and limited access to care".
Many observers would agree with this diagnosis, but many would undoubtedly disagree with this advocacy of more market forces. Doctors have an intuitive distrust of competition, which they often equate with greed, while many public-policy thinkers argue that the only way to fix America’s problem is to quash the private sector’s role altogether and instead set up a government monopoly like Britain’s National Health Service.
Mr. Porter strongly disagrees. He starts by acknowledging that competition, as it has been introduced to America’s health system, has in fact done more harm than good. But he argues that competition has been introduced piecemeal, in incoherent and counter-productive ways that lead to perverse incentives and worse outcomes: "health-care competition is not focused on delivering value for patients", he says.
Mr. Porter offers a mix of solutions to fix this mess, and thereby to put the sector on a genuinely competitive footing. First comes the seemingly obvious (but as yet unrealized) goal of data transparency. Second is a redirection of competition from the level of health plans, doctors, clinics and hospitals, to competition "at the level of medical conditions, which is all but absent". The authors argue that the right measure of "value" for the health sector should be how well a patient with a given health condition fares over the entire cycle of treatment, and what the cost is for that entire cycle. That rightly emphasizes the role of early detection and preventive care over techno-fixes, pricey pills and the other failings of today’s system.
If there is a failing in this argument, it is that he sometimes strays toward naive optimism. Mr. Porter argues, for example, that his solutions are so commonsensical that private actors in the health system could forge ahead with them profitably without waiting for the government to fix its policy mistakes. That is a tempting notion, but it falls into a trap that economists call the fallacy of the $20 bill on the street. If there really were easy money on the pavement, goes the argument, surely previous passers-by would have bent over and picked it up by now.
In the same vein, if Mr. Porter’s prescriptions are so sensible that companies can make money even now in the absence of government policy changes, why in the world have they not done so already? One reason may be that they can make more money in the current suboptimal equilibrium than in a perfectly competitive market—which is why government action is probably needed to sweep aside the many obstacles in the way of Mr. Porter’s powerful vision.
选项
A、American spends more money on health care than on other services.
B、Most Americans couldn’t get their health insurance till their old age.
C、Most American hospitals do not offer outstanding treatment to patients.
D、The costs of health care are not steered towards a health direction.
答案
D
解析
事实细节题。题干问美国医疗系统最大的问题,可定位在文章第二段中出现"above all"的地方。而"above all"以后只有谈到关于costs,即成本问题,因此只有答案选项正确。其他选项都把原文内容偷换了概念,因此排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/eoK4777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Selectiontoparticipateinatopexecutive-educationprogramisanimportantrungontheladdertotopcorporatejobs.U.S.cor
Selectiontoparticipateinatopexecutive-educationprogramisanimportantrungontheladdertotopcorporatejobs.U.S.cor
SearchengineGooglewasaimingtofloatonWallStreetthisweek,valuedatupto$36billion.ButtheInternetcompany’sadvis
Theriseofmultinationalcorporations,globalmarketing,newcommunicationstechnologies,andshrinkingculturaldifferencesha
A.MainResultsofRecentResearches.B.PopularDoubtabouttheNewView.C.EffectofEnvironmentonIntelligence.D.Intellig
Whatifarchitectscouldbuildlivingsystemsratherthanstaticbuildings—dynamicstructuresthatmodifytheirinternalande
Theprotectionofculturaldiversityfromapoliticalandeconomicpointofviewinfactbecamepressingwithglobalization,whi
ItisbecauseofhisplaysthatShakespeareisnowconsideredthegreatestEnglishwriterinhistory.Theerainwhichhelived,
Itisnaturalforyoungpeopletobecriticaloftheirparentsattimesandtoblamethemformostofthemisunderstandingsbetw
Usingonlyafewcomputers,researchersatthefederalIdahoNationalLaboratorymanagedtolaunchacyberattackthatcrippleda
随机试题
慢性活动性肝炎不会出现以下哪项异常
男,23岁,下腰及左腿痛3个月加重1周,查体左直腿抬高试验40°(+),加强试验(+),左拇趾背伸肌力减弱.X线平片示腰椎曲度变直,骶椎裂。依据病史体征及X线检查,应考虑
降低疾病的发病率和(或)现患率称为在一个地区范围内,采取有效的预防策略与措施,使某种传染病消失。称之为
一成人患急性腹膜炎,高热,食欲不振,出现头晕,嗜睡,呼吸深而快,口唇樱红,血二氧化碳结合力30容积%尿pH为6,应属于
某商业企业(增值税一般纳税人)2016年2月发生如下业务:(1)取得日用品不含税销售收人400万元,采取以旧换新方式销售冰箱100台,新冰箱的零售价格为1.17万元/台,旧冰箱的含税作价为0.2万元/台,收取的含税差价款为0.97万元/台。(2)采取预
一份书面的营销计划通常包括()等内容。
Untillastspring,NiaParkerandtheotherkidsinherneighborhoodcommutedtoschoolonBus59.Butasfuelpricesrose,the
设矩阵An×n正定,证明:存在正定阵B,使A=B2.
Whenapersoniscuriousaboutsomething,itmeansheis(41)initandwishestoknowmoreaboutit.Wecansayhehascurio
ForAmericans,timeisa"resource"that,likewaterorcoal,canbeusedwellorpoorly.Thefuturewillnotbebetterthanthe
最新回复
(
0
)