首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Michael Porter, who has made his name throughout the business community by advocating his theories of competitive advantages, is
Michael Porter, who has made his name throughout the business community by advocating his theories of competitive advantages, is
admin
2014-06-13
45
问题
Michael Porter, who has made his name throughout the business community by advocating his theories of competitive advantages, is now swimming into even more shark-infested waters, arguing that competition can save even America’s troubled health-care system, the largest in the world. Mr. Porter argues in "Redefining Health Care" that competition, if properly applied, can also fix what ails this sector.
That is a bold claim, given the horrible state of America’s health-care system. Just consider a few of its failings: America pays more per capita for health care than most countries, but it still has some 45m citizens with no health insurance at all. While a few receive outstanding treatment, he shows in heart-wrenching detail that most do not. The system, wastes huge resources on paperwork, ignores preventive care and, above all, has perverse incentives that encourage shifting costs rather than cutting them outright. He concludes that it is "on a dangerous path, with a toxic combination of high costs, uneven quality, frequent errors and limited access to care".
Many observers would agree with this diagnosis, but many would undoubtedly disagree with this advocacy of more market forces. Doctors have an intuitive distrust of competition, which they often equate with greed, while many public-policy thinkers argue that the only way to fix America’s problem is to quash the private sector’s role altogether and instead set up a government monopoly like Britain’s National Health Service.
Mr. Porter strongly disagrees. He starts by acknowledging that competition, as it has been introduced to America’s health system, has in fact done more harm than good. But he argues that competition has been introduced piecemeal, in incoherent and counter-productive ways that lead to perverse incentives and worse outcomes: "health-care competition is not focused on delivering value for patients", he says.
Mr. Porter offers a mix of solutions to fix this mess, and thereby to put the sector on a genuinely competitive footing. First comes the seemingly obvious (but as yet unrealized) goal of data transparency. Second is a redirection of competition from the level of health plans, doctors, clinics and hospitals, to competition "at the level of medical conditions, which is all but absent". The authors argue that the right measure of "value" for the health sector should be how well a patient with a given health condition fares over the entire cycle of treatment, and what the cost is for that entire cycle. That rightly emphasizes the role of early detection and preventive care over techno-fixes, pricey pills and the other failings of today’s system.
If there is a failing in this argument, it is that he sometimes strays toward naive optimism. Mr. Porter argues, for example, that his solutions are so commonsensical that private actors in the health system could forge ahead with them profitably without waiting for the government to fix its policy mistakes. That is a tempting notion, but it falls into a trap that economists call the fallacy of the $20 bill on the street. If there really were easy money on the pavement, goes the argument, surely previous passers-by would have bent over and picked it up by now.
In the same vein, if Mr. Porter’s prescriptions are so sensible that companies can make money even now in the absence of government policy changes, why in the world have they not done so already? One reason may be that they can make more money in the current suboptimal equilibrium than in a perfectly competitive market—which is why government action is probably needed to sweep aside the many obstacles in the way of Mr. Porter’s powerful vision.
选项
A、American spends more money on health care than on other services.
B、Most Americans couldn’t get their health insurance till their old age.
C、Most American hospitals do not offer outstanding treatment to patients.
D、The costs of health care are not steered towards a health direction.
答案
D
解析
事实细节题。题干问美国医疗系统最大的问题,可定位在文章第二段中出现"above all"的地方。而"above all"以后只有谈到关于costs,即成本问题,因此只有答案选项正确。其他选项都把原文内容偷换了概念,因此排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/eoK4777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Selectiontoparticipateinatopexecutive-educationprogramisanimportantrungontheladdertotopcorporatejobs.U.S.cor
Inthefollowingtext,somesentenceshavebeenremoved.ForQuestions41-45,choosethemostsuitableonefromthelist(A、B、C、
Thefollowingparagraphsaregiveninawrongorder.ForQuestions41-45,youarerequiredtoreorganizetheseparagraphsintoa
Thefollowingparagraphsaregiveninawrongorder.ForQuestions41-45,youarerequiredtoreorganizetheseparagraphsintoa
Theriseofmultinationalcorporations,globalmarketing,newcommunicationstechnologies,andshrinkingculturaldifferencesha
Couldthebadolddaysofeconomicdeclinebeabouttoreturn?SinceOPECagreedtosupply-cutsinMarch,thepriceofcrudeoil
Happinessisfashionablethesedays.Yetshouldweacceptthecommonviewthatthenew"science"ofhappinesshascementedthes
ThatMicrosoft’sthreetasksarecollidingisreflectedinthefactthat______.Whichofthefollowingdoesnotbelongtothe"
Usingonlyafewcomputers,researchersatthefederalIdahoNationalLaboratorymanagedtolaunchacyberattackthatcrippleda
Usingonlyafewcomputers,researchersatthefederalIdahoNationalLaboratorymanagedtolaunchacyberattackthatcrippleda
随机试题
外伤性颅内血肿的主要致命因素是
气、血、痰、食、水、虫等所渐积形成的有形实者,宜选用的治法是
糖尿病酮症酸中毒的特征性表现是
"阳在外阴之使也,阴在内阳之守也"说明了下列何种关系
在民事诉讼的过程中,下列各情形中人民法院不应当依职权调查的事项是:()。
下列各种存货发出的计价方法中,不利于存货成本日常管理与控制的方法是()。
××省政府关于××市××历史文化名村保护规划的批复×政复[2015]64号××市人民政府:贵市________。现批复如下:一、原则同意贵市报送的
若甲、乙、丙三人随机地站成一排,则甲、乙两人相邻而站的概率为__________.
用国际音标给“欢呼党的十六大”注上严式音标,请对头三个音节的元、辅音进行描写然后分析其中的元音是儿个音位,并列举每个元音音位的变体。(北京师范大学考研试题)
2021年3月,中共中央、国务院发布《关于实现巩固拓展脱贫攻坚成果同乡村振兴有效衔接的意见》。该意见指出,聚力做好脱贫地区巩固拓展脱贫攻坚成果同乡村振兴有效衔接重点工作。下列不属于其相关举措的有()。①促进脱贫人口稳定就业
最新回复
(
0
)